Suppr超能文献

数字颜色奇偶性和大小关联的内隐学习

Implicit Learning of Parity and Magnitude Associations with Number Color.

作者信息

Retter Talia L, Schiltz Christine

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, LU.

Université de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA, F-54000 Nancy, FR.

出版信息

J Cogn. 2025 Jan 28;8(1):21. doi: 10.5334/joc.428. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Associative learning can occur implicitly for stimuli that occur together probabilistically. It is debated whether probabilistic, implicit learning occurs not only at the item level, but also at the category level. Here, we investigated whether associative learning would occur between color and numerical categories, while participants performed a color task. In category-level experiments for each parity and magnitude, high-probability pairings of four numbers with one color were categorically consistent (e.g., the Arabic numerals 2,4,6, and 8 appeared in blue with a high probability, p = .9). Associative learning was measured as higher performance for high-probability vs. low-probability color/number pairings. For both parity and magnitude, performance was significantly better for high- vs. low-probability trials (parity: 3.1% more accurate; magnitude: 1.3% more accurate; 9 ms faster). Category-level learning was also evident in a subsequent color association report task with novel double-digit numbers (parity: 63% accuracy; magnitude: 55%). In control, item-level experiments, in which high-probability pairings were not categorically consistent (e.g., 2,3,6, and 7 appeared in blue with a high probability, p = .9), no significant differences between high- vs. low-probability trials were present. These results are in line with associative learning occurring at the category level, and, further, suggest automatic semantic processing of symbolic numerals in terms of parity and magnitude.

摘要

对于一起出现具有概率性的刺激,关联性学习可以隐性地发生。概率性的隐性学习是否不仅在项目层面,而且在类别层面发生,这存在争议。在这里,我们研究了在参与者执行颜色任务时,颜色和数字类别之间是否会发生关联性学习。在针对每个奇偶性和量级的类别层面实验中,四个数字与一种颜色的高概率配对在类别上是一致的(例如,阿拉伯数字2、4、6和8以高概率(p = 0.9)出现在蓝色中)。关联性学习通过高概率与低概率颜色/数字配对的更高表现来衡量。对于奇偶性和量级,高概率试验与低概率试验相比,表现显著更好(奇偶性:准确率高3.1%;量级:准确率高1.3%;快9毫秒)。在随后使用新的两位数的颜色关联报告任务中,类别层面的学习也很明显(奇偶性:准确率63%;量级:准确率55%)。在对照的项目层面实验中,高概率配对在类别上不一致(例如,2、3、6和7以高概率(p = 0.9)出现在蓝色中),高概率试验与低概率试验之间没有显著差异。这些结果与在类别层面发生的关联性学习一致,并且进一步表明在奇偶性和量级方面对符号数字进行了自动语义处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/923a/11784500/611f14b9eb31/joc-8-1-428-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验