• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤中心指定对南加州器官捐献结果的影响。

The effect of trauma center designation on organ donor outcomes in Southern California.

作者信息

Salim Ali, Berry Cherisse, Ley Eric J, Schulman Danielle, Bukur Marko, Margulies Daniel R, Navarro Sonia, Malinoski Darren

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):535-9.

PMID:22546124
Abstract

We sought to investigate the effect of trauma center designation on organ donor outcomes during a 5-year period. A retrospective study of the southern California regional Organ Procurement Organization database comparing trauma centers (n = 25) versus nontrauma centers (n = 171) and Level I (n = 7) versus Level II (n = 18) trauma centers between 2004 and 2008 was performed. A total of 16,830 referrals were evaluated and 44 per cent were from trauma centers. When compared with nontrauma centers (n = 171), trauma centers (n = 25) had a higher percentage of medically suitable eligible deaths (29 vs 16%, P < 0.001), total eligible deaths (22 vs 12%, P < 0.001), and eligible donors (14 vs 7%, P < 0.001). Trauma Centers had a significantly higher number of organs procured per donor (4.0 ± 1.6 vs 3.5 ± 1.6, P < 0.001), organs transplanted per donor (OTPD) (3.6 ± 1.8 vs 2.8 ± 1.8, P < 0.001), and higher organ yield (per cent 4 or greater OTPD [48 vs 31%, P < 0.001]). No significant differences were found between Level I and Level II trauma centers. Trauma centers demonstrate significantly better organ donor outcomes compared with nontrauma centers. Factors responsible for improved outcomes at trauma centers should be evaluated, reproduced, and disseminated to nontrauma centers to alleviate the growing organ shortage crisis.

摘要

我们试图调查创伤中心指定在5年期间对器官捐献者结局的影响。对南加州地区器官获取组织数据库进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了2004年至2008年期间的创伤中心(n = 25)与非创伤中心(n = 171)以及Ⅰ级创伤中心(n = 7)与Ⅱ级创伤中心(n = 18)。共评估了16,830例转诊病例,其中44%来自创伤中心。与非创伤中心(n = 171)相比,创伤中心(n = 25)在医学上适合的合格死亡比例更高(29%对16%,P < 0.001),总合格死亡比例更高(22%对12%,P < 0.001),合格捐献者比例更高(14%对7%,P < 0.001)。创伤中心每位捐献者获取的器官数量显著更多(4.0 ± 1.6对3.5 ± 1.6,P < 0.001),每位捐献者移植的器官数量(OTPD)更多(3.6 ± 1.8对2.8 ± 1.8,P < 0.001),器官产出率更高(OTPD为4个或更多的百分比[48%对31%,P < 0.001])。Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级创伤中心之间未发现显著差异。与非创伤中心相比,创伤中心的器官捐献者结局显著更好。应评估、重现并向非创伤中心传播导致创伤中心结局改善的因素,以缓解日益严重的器官短缺危机。

相似文献

1
The effect of trauma center designation on organ donor outcomes in Southern California.创伤中心指定对南加州器官捐献结果的影响。
Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):535-9.
2
The effect of a protocol of aggressive donor management: Implications for the national organ donor shortage.积极的供体管理方案的效果:对全国器官供体短缺问题的影响
J Trauma. 2006 Aug;61(2):429-33; discussion 433-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000228968.63652.c1.
3
Achieving donor management goals before deceased donor procurement is associated with more organs transplanted per donor.在已故供体获取前实现供体管理目标与每位供体移植更多器官相关。
J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):990-5; discussion 996. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822779e5.
4
In-house coordinator programs improve conversion rates for organ donation.内部协调员项目提高了器官捐赠的转化率。
J Trauma. 2011 Sep;71(3):733-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820500e6.
5
Cadaveric organ donor availability: regional trauma center vs. community hospital.尸体器官供体的可获得性:区域创伤中心与社区医院对比
J Trauma. 1990 Nov;30(11):1366-71.
6
Organ Procurement Organization and transplant center effects on cadaver renal transplant outcomes.器官获取组织和移植中心对尸体肾移植结果的影响。
Clin Transpl. 1996:427-41.
7
Organ donor management and organ outcome: a 6-year review from a Level I trauma center.器官捐献者管理与器官结果:来自一级创伤中心的6年回顾
J Trauma. 1990 Jun;30(6):728-32.
8
Donor management parameters and organ yield: single center results.供体管理参数与器官获取量:单中心结果
J Surg Res. 2014 Sep;191(1):208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.02.054. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
9
The reward is worth the wait: a prospective analysis of 100 consecutive organ donors.等待是值得的:对100例连续器官捐献者的前瞻性分析。
Am Surg. 2012 Mar;78(3):296-9.
10
Emergency department referral for organ donation: more organ donors and more organs per donor.急诊部门的器官捐献推荐:更多的器官捐献者和每个捐献者更多的器官。
Am J Surg. 2014 May;207(5):728-33; discussion 733-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers in the donor family interview process from the perspective of hospital staff: a cross-sectional study.从医院工作人员角度看供体家庭访谈过程中的促进因素和障碍:一项横断面研究。
Korean J Transplant. 2023 Dec 31;37(4):241-249. doi: 10.4285/kjt.23.0049. Epub 2023 Nov 24.