Suppr超能文献

医生应该成为专家证人。

Physicians should be expert witnesses.

作者信息

Fish R, Rosen P

机构信息

Covenant Medical Center, Champaign, Illinois.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;8(5):659-63. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(90)90473-9.

Abstract

Physicians have a responsibility to society, their peers, and patients to participate in malpractice litigation in a manner that ensures that medical malpractice cases are properly evaluated. Physicians are reluctant to involve themselves as expert witnesses in medical malpractice litigation because of not wanting to further any malpractice suits, mistrust of attorneys and misconceptions about expert witnesses and the legal system in general. The expert witness should be an impartial practicing physician who can select those suits that should or should not be filed and identify which parties were negligent in each case. If impartial physicians do not evaluate cases for attorneys, other more partisan and less objective physicians will.

摘要

医生对社会、同行和患者负有责任,应以确保医疗事故案件得到妥善评估的方式参与医疗事故诉讼。由于不想助长任何医疗事故诉讼、对律师的不信任以及对专家证人及整个法律体系的误解,医生不愿在医疗事故诉讼中担任专家证人。专家证人应该是一名公正的执业医生,能够筛选出应该或不应该提起的诉讼,并确定在每个案件中哪些当事人存在过失。如果公正的医生不为律师评估案件,那么其他更具党派性且客观性较差的医生就会这么做。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验