• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

17 种印度语言的长期平均语音频谱和动态范围。

Long-Term Average Speech Spectra and Dynamic Ranges of 17 Indian Languages.

机构信息

Dhwani Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2021 Dec 9;30(4):1096-1107. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00125. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00125
PMID:34752152
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this work, we have determined the long-term average speech spectra (LTASS) and dynamic ranges (DR) of 17 Indian languages. This work is important because LTASS and DR are language-dependent functions used to fit hearing aids, calculate the Speech Intelligibility Index, and recognize speech automatically. Currently, LTASS and DR functions for English are used to fit hearing aids in India. Our work may help improve the performance of hearing aids in the Indian context.

METHOD

Speech samples from native talkers were used as stimuli in this study. Each speech sample was initially cleaned for extraneous sounds and excessively long pauses. Next, LTASS and DR functions for each language were calculated for different frequency bands. Similar analysis was also performed for English for reference purposes. Two-way analysis of variance was also conducted to understand the effects of important parameters on LTASS and DR. Finally, a one-sample test was conducted to assess the significance of important statistical attributes of our data.

RESULTS

We showed that LTASS and DR for Indian languages are 5-10 dB and 11 dB less than those for English. These differences may be due to lesser use rate of high-frequency dominant phonemes and preponderance of vowel-ending words in Indian languages. We also showed that LTASS and DR do not differ significantly across Indian languages. Hence, we propose a common LTASS and DR for Indian languages.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that differences in LTASS and DR for Indian languages vis-à-vis English are large and significant. Such differences may be attributed to phonetic and linguistic characteristics of Indian languages.

摘要

目的

在这项工作中,我们确定了 17 种印度语言的长期平均语音谱 (LTASS) 和动态范围 (DR)。这项工作很重要,因为 LTASS 和 DR 是依赖于语言的函数,用于适配助听器、计算语音可懂度指数和自动识别语音。目前,印度使用英语的 LTASS 和 DR 函数来适配助听器。我们的工作可能有助于提高印度助听器的性能。

方法

本研究使用母语说话者的语音样本作为刺激。每个语音样本最初都经过清理,去除了无关的声音和过长的停顿。然后,为不同的频带计算了每种语言的 LTASS 和 DR 函数。也为英语进行了类似的分析以供参考。还进行了双向方差分析,以了解重要参数对 LTASS 和 DR 的影响。最后,进行了一个单样本 t 检验,以评估我们数据的重要统计属性的显著性。

结果

我们表明,印度语言的 LTASS 和 DR 比英语低 5-10dB 和 11dB。这些差异可能是由于印度语言中高频主导音素的使用频率较低,以及元音结尾的单词较多。我们还表明,印度语言之间的 LTASS 和 DR 没有显著差异。因此,我们提出了印度语言的共同 LTASS 和 DR。

结论

我们表明,印度语言与英语的 LTASS 和 DR 存在显著差异。这些差异可能归因于印度语言的语音和语言特征。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Average Speech Spectra and Dynamic Ranges of 17 Indian Languages.17 种印度语言的长期平均语音频谱和动态范围。
Am J Audiol. 2021 Dec 9;30(4):1096-1107. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00125. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
2
Amplification rationale for hearing aids based on characteristics of the Japanese language.基于日语特点的助听器放大原理。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2022 Feb;49(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 16.
3
Cross-language identification of long-term average speech spectra in Korean and English: toward a better understanding of the quantitative difference between two languages.跨语言识别韩语和英语的长期平均语音谱:更好地理解两种语言之间的定量差异。
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):441-3. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234f03e.
4
Long term average speech spectra of Turkish.土耳其语的长期平均语音频谱。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018 Oct;43(3):101-105. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2017.1377286. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Long-term and short-term characteristics of speech: implications for hearing aid selection for young children.
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Jun;36(3):609-20. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3603.609.
6
Dynamic range for speech materials in korean, english, and mandarin: a cross-language comparison.韩语、英语和普通话语音材料的动态范围:跨语言比较
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Oct;57(5):2024-30. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-14-0002.
7
How Does Speaking Clearly Influence Acoustic Measures? A Speech Clarity Study Using Long-term Average Speech Spectra in Korean Language.清晰发音如何影响声学测量?使用韩语的长期平均语音谱进行语音清晰度研究。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;5(2):68-73. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.2.68. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
8
Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.克罗地亚语和英语中清晰语音的产生与感知。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Sep;118(3 Pt 1):1677-88. doi: 10.1121/1.2000788.
9
Sensitivity of the Speech Intelligibility Index to the Assumed Dynamic Range.言语可懂度指数对假定动态范围的敏感性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 10;60(6):1674-1680. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0348.
10
Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.针对以英语为母语和非英语母语者的、对掩蔽语音的语言内容具有可变访问权限的语音对语音掩蔽。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Apr;25(4):355-66. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.4.7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Vowels on the Identification of Spoken Disyllabic Words in the Malayalam Language for Individuals with Hearing Loss.元音对马拉雅拉姆语中听力损失者口语双音节词识别的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 30;14(23):2707. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232707.