Fülöp Tibor, Schmidt Darren W, Cosmin Adrian, Islam Nahid, Wells Catherine, Lengvárszky Zsolt, Bilbrew Daphne M, Zsom Lajos
Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Clin Nephrol. 2012 May;77(5):383-91. doi: 10.5414/cn107138.
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis are perceived to have difficult-to-control blood pressure (BP) and commonly treated with complex antihypertensive regimens. Our hypothesis was that peri-dialysis BP will overestimate the true burden of hypertension in these patients.
We performed 44-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 43 patients recruited from the University of Mississippi outpatient dialysis unit. Data collected included routine peri-dialysis blood systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), weight gain, and demographic information. We investigated whether the pre-dialysis or post-dialysis blood pressure would better correspond to the ABPM results.
The mean age of participants was 50.5 ± 12.05 years, 95% African-American, and 44% diabetic with an average dialysis vintage of 31.1 ± 30 months. The mean SBP and DBP were 164.6/87.9 mmHg ± 22.3/15 before dialysis, 151.5/81.3 mmHg ± 24.1/13 after dialysis and 136/80.6 mmHg ± 23.5/14.7 during ABPM. There were wide limits of agreements between peri-dialysis BP and ABPM, the largest with pre-dialysis SBP (28.5 ± 16.6 mmHg) and the least with post-dialysis DBP (0.7 ± 10 mmHg). With both peri-dialysis BP measurements as explanatory variables in a linear regression model, only the post-dialysis SBP (β 0.716; p < 0.001) but not pre-dialysis SBP (β 0.157; p = 0.276) had a significant independent association with ABPM systolic BP. For DBP, both pre-dialysis (β 0.543; p = 0.001) and post-dialysis (β 0.317; p = 0.037) values retained correlation with DBP on ABPM.
Peri-dialysis measurements overestimated true BP burden in this Southeastern U.S. cohort of ESRD patients. When BP readings from outside the dialysis unit are notavailable, assessment of BP control should focus pre-dialysis on DBP and post-dialysison both SBP and DBP.
接受透析治疗的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者被认为血压难以控制,通常采用复杂的抗高血压治疗方案。我们的假设是,透析期间血压会高估这些患者高血压的真实负担。
我们对从密西西比大学门诊透析单元招募的43名患者进行了44小时动态血压监测(ABPM)。收集的数据包括常规透析前收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、体重增加情况及人口统计学信息。我们研究了透析前或透析后血压是否与ABPM结果更相符。
参与者的平均年龄为50.5±12.05岁,95%为非裔美国人,44%患有糖尿病,平均透析时间为31.1±30个月。透析前平均SBP和DBP分别为164.6/87.9 mmHg±22.3/15,透析后为151.5/81.3 mmHg±24.1/13,ABPM期间为136/80.6 mmHg±23.5/14.7。透析期间血压与ABPM之间的一致性界限较宽,最大的是透析前SBP(28.5±16.6 mmHg),最小的是透析后DBP(0.7±10 mmHg)。在线性回归模型中,将透析期间的血压测量值作为解释变量,只有透析后SBP(β0.716;p<0.001)与ABPM收缩压有显著独立相关性,而透析前SBP(β0.157;p = 0.276)无此相关性。对于DBP,透析前(β0.543;p = 0.001)和透析后(β0.317;p = 0.037)的值均与ABPM上的DBP保持相关性。
在美国东南部的这组ESRD患者中,透析期间测量值高估了真实血压负担。当无法获得透析单元外的血压读数时,血压控制评估应在透析前关注DBP,透析后关注SBP和DBP。