Suppr超能文献

心房扑动消融术几乎均告失败,需持续使用抗心律失常药物(联合治疗)以长期控制心房颤动。

Nearly uniform failure of atrial flutter ablation and continuation of antiarrhythmic agents (hybrid therapy) for the long-term control of atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Anastasio Nicholas, Frankel David S, Deyell Marc W, Zado Erica, Gerstenfeld Edward P, Dixit Sanjay, Cooper Joshua, Lin David, Marchlinski Francis E, Callans David J

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Electrophysiology Section, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 9 Founders Pavilion, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;35(1):57-61. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9679-0. Epub 2012 May 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ablation for atrial flutter and continued pharmacologic therapy (hybrid therapy) is a management strategy when treatment with class I antiarrhythmic drugs organize atrial fibrillation (AF) into flutter. Previous studies with 2-3-year follow-up have reported satisfactory control of AF burden.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effectiveness of hybrid therapy after a follow-up of 5 years. We hypothesized that longer term follow-up would demonstrate eventual failure of this strategy to control AF.

METHODS

A consecutive, retrospective evaluation of all first time ablations of right atrial flutter at the University of Pennsylvania between August 2003 and August 2005 was performed (n = 179). The study population consisted of 33 patients who had atrial flutter only after treatment of AF with class I antiarrhythmic drugs and was continued on them post-ablation. Follow-up data were obtained by reviewing records from our institution, from referring cardiologists, and from direct patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation recurrence was noted in 28 of 31 patients (90.3 %) who completed 5 years of follow-up. AF recurrence typically resulted in significant symptoms, although 21 % developed persistent AF and were eventually minimally symptomatic on a rate control strategy. A wide range of time to recurrence was observed (0.2-64.5 months) with 39 % recurring greater than 2 years post-ablation.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid therapy is not effective for long-term control of AF. Patients should be counseled about the likelihood of eventual AF recurrence and anticoagulation should be maintained indefinitely when this strategy is used.

摘要

背景

当使用 I 类抗心律失常药物将心房颤动(AF)转变为心房扑动时,心房扑动消融术与持续药物治疗(联合治疗)是一种管理策略。既往随访 2 - 3 年的研究报告称房颤负荷得到了满意控制。

目的

我们评估了联合治疗 5 年后的有效性。我们假设长期随访将显示该策略最终无法控制房颤。

方法

对 2003 年 8 月至 2005 年 8 月在宾夕法尼亚大学首次进行右心房扑动消融术的所有患者进行了连续的回顾性评估(n = 179)。研究人群包括 33 例仅在使用 I 类抗心律失常药物治疗房颤后出现心房扑动且消融术后继续使用这些药物的患者。通过查阅我们机构的记录、转诊心脏病专家的记录以及直接的患者问卷来获取随访数据。

结果

在完成 5 年随访的 31 例患者中,有 28 例(90.3%)出现房颤复发。房颤复发通常导致明显症状,尽管 21%发展为持续性房颤,最终通过心率控制策略症状轻微。观察到复发时间范围很广(0.2 - 64.5 个月),39%在消融术后 2 年以上复发。

结论

联合治疗对房颤的长期控制无效。当使用该策略时,应告知患者最终房颤复发的可能性,并应无限期维持抗凝治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验