Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012 Jul;18(7):1333-9. doi: 10.1002/ibd.22973. Epub 2012 May 2.
We planned to systematically review the efficacy of sargramostim (granulocyte colony stimulating factor [GM-CSF]) for remission induction in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).
A literature search to April 2011 was performed to identify all randomized trials studying sargramostim in patients with CD. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate study quality and the GRADE criteria were utilized to assess the overall quality of the evidence.
Three randomized studies (total 537 patients) were identified. The risk of bias was low for the three included studies. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved clinical remission (GM-CSF 25.3%; placebo 17.5%; relative risk [RR] 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-3.50; P = 0.17), or 100-point clinical response (GM-CSF 38.3%; placebo 24.8%; RR 1.71 95% CI 0.98-2.97; P = 0.06). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients (GM-CSF 95.8%; placebo 89.3%) who experienced adverse events (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.99-1.16; P = 0.08), or serious adverse events (GM-CSF 12.0% vs. placebo 4.8%; RR 2.21; 95% CI 0.84-5.81; P = 0.11).
Sargramostim does not appear to be more effective than placebo for induction of clinical remission or improvement in active CD. However, the GRADE analysis indicates that the overall quality of the evidence for the primary and secondary outcomes was low due to sparse data and heterogeneity, indicating that further research likely would have a significant impact on the effect estimates.
我们计划系统地回顾沙格司亭(粒细胞集落刺激因子[GM-CSF])在诱导克罗恩病(CD)患者缓解方面的疗效。
对截至 2011 年 4 月的文献进行检索,以确定所有研究沙格司亭治疗 CD 患者的随机试验。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估研究质量,采用 GRADE 标准评估证据的总体质量。
共确定了 3 项随机研究(共 537 例患者)。纳入的 3 项研究的偏倚风险较低。在达到临床缓解的患者比例(GM-CSF 25.3%;安慰剂 17.5%;相对风险[RR]1.67;95%置信区间[CI]0.80-3.50;P=0.17)或 100 分临床反应(GM-CSF 38.3%;安慰剂 24.8%;RR 1.71 95% CI 0.98-2.97;P=0.06)方面,GM-CSF 组与安慰剂组之间无统计学显著差异。在发生不良事件的患者比例(GM-CSF 95.8%;安慰剂 89.3%)(RR 1.07;95% CI 0.99-1.16;P=0.08)或严重不良事件(GM-CSF 12.0%vs.安慰剂 4.8%;RR 2.21;95% CI 0.84-5.81;P=0.11)方面,GM-CSF 组与安慰剂组之间也无统计学显著差异。
沙格司亭似乎不如安慰剂更能诱导 CD 患者的临床缓解或改善活动度。然而,GRADE 分析表明,由于数据稀疏和异质性,主要和次要结局的证据总体质量较低,表明进一步的研究可能会对效应估计产生重大影响。