• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生质量改进激励措施与门诊质量指标之间的关系。

Association between physician quality improvement incentives and ambulatory quality measures.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2012 Apr 1;18(4):e126-34.

PMID:22554038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3537503/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of physician incentives for quality and to test the hypothesis that the quality of ambulatory medical care is better when provided by physicians with these incentives.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

METHODS

We examined the association between 12 measures of high-quality ambulatory care and physician compensation based on quality, physician compensation based on satisfaction, and public reporting of quality measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 20.8% of visits were to physicians whose compensation was partially based on quality, 17.7% of visits were to physicians whose compensation was partially based on patient satisfaction, and 10.0% of visits were to physicians who publicly reported quality measures. Quality of ambulatory care varied: weight reduction counseling occurred in 12.0% of preventive care visits by obese patients, whereas no urinalysis in patients with no indication was achieved in 93.0% of preventive care visits. In multivariable analyses, there were no statistically significant associations between compensation for quality and delivery of any of the 12 measures, nor between compensation for satisfaction and 11 of the 12 measures; the exception was body mass index screening in preventive visits (47.8% vs 56.2%, adjusted P = .004). There was also no statistically significant association between public reporting and delivery of 11 of 12 measures; the exception was weight reduction counseling for overweight patients (10.0% vs 25.5%, adjusted P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no consistent association between incentives for quality and 12 measures of high-quality ambulatory care.

摘要

目的

确定医生质量激励措施的流行程度,并检验这样一种假设,即当医生具有这些激励措施时,门诊医疗质量会更好。

研究设计

使用国家门诊医疗调查数据进行的横断面研究。

方法

我们检查了 12 项高质量门诊护理措施与基于质量的医生薪酬之间的关联、基于患者满意度的医生薪酬之间的关联以及质量措施的公开报告。

结果

总体而言,20.8%的就诊是由部分基于质量的薪酬补偿的医生提供的,17.7%的就诊是由部分基于患者满意度的薪酬补偿的医生提供的,10.0%的就诊是由公开报告质量措施的医生提供的。门诊护理质量存在差异:肥胖患者的预防保健就诊中,有 12.0%接受了减重咨询,而在没有指征的预防保健就诊中,没有进行任何尿分析,这一比例达到了 93.0%。在多变量分析中,质量补偿与 12 项措施中的任何一项的提供之间没有统计学上显著的关联,满意度补偿与 11 项措施中的任何一项之间也没有关联;但预防就诊中的体重指数筛查除外(47.8%比 56.2%,调整后的 P =.004)。公开报告与 12 项措施中的 11 项措施的提供之间也没有统计学上显著的关联;但超重患者的减重咨询除外(10.0%比 25.5%,调整后的 P =.01)。

结论

我们没有发现质量激励措施与 12 项高质量门诊护理措施之间存在一致的关联。

相似文献

1
Association between physician quality improvement incentives and ambulatory quality measures.医生质量改进激励措施与门诊质量指标之间的关系。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Apr 1;18(4):e126-34.
2
Association of Primary Care Physician Compensation Incentives and Quality of Care in the United States, 2012-2016.美国初级保健医生薪酬激励与医疗质量的关联:2012-2016 年
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06617-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
3
The impact of physician economic incentives on admission rates of patients with ambulatory sensitive conditions: an analysis comparing two managed care structures and indemnity insurance.医生经济激励措施对非卧床敏感疾病患者住院率的影响:一项比较两种管理式医疗结构和赔偿保险的分析
Am J Manag Care. 1997 Jan;3(1):49-56.
4
Physician incentives and disclosure of payment methods to patients.医生激励措施及向患者披露支付方式
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Mar;16(3):181-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.04139.x.
5
Federally qualified health centers and private practice performance on ambulatory care measures.合格的联邦医疗保险医疗机构和私人执业医生在门诊护理措施上的表现。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.033.
6
Primary care physicians' experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems.初级保健医生在管理式医疗系统中对经济激励措施的体验。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 19;339(21):1516-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811193392106.
7
Physician financial incentives and care for the underserved in the United States.美国医生的经济激励措施与为弱势群体提供的医疗服务
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Feb;20(2):121-9.
8
Comparison of the quality of ambulatory care for fee-for-service and prepaid patients.按服务收费患者与预付费患者门诊护理质量的比较。
Ann Intern Med. 1991 Sep 1;115(5):394-400. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-5-394.
9
Organizational and market influences on physician performance on patient experience measures.组织和市场对医生在患者体验指标方面表现的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun;44(3):880-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00960.x. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
10
Implementing evidence-based medicine: the role of market pressures, compensation incentives, and culture in physician organizations.实施循证医学:市场压力、薪酬激励和文化在医师组织中的作用。
Med Care. 2001 Jul;39(7 Suppl 1):I62-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Primary Care Physician Compensation Incentives and Quality of Care in the United States, 2012-2016.美国初级保健医生薪酬激励与医疗质量的关联:2012-2016 年
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06617-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Mechanisms and impact of public reporting on physicians and hospitals' performance: A systematic review (2000-2020).公众报告对医生和医院绩效的影响机制和影响:系统评价(2000-2020 年)。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247297. eCollection 2021.
3
Does the Regulatory Environment Affect Nurse Practitioners' Patterns of Practice or Quality of Care in Health Centers?监管环境是否会影响健康中心执业护士的执业模式或护理质量?
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):437-458. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12643.
4
Standard compared with mnemonic counseling for fecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.粪便失禁的标准咨询与记忆辅助咨询对比:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1063-1070. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000755.
5
Physicians’ lack of awareness of how they are paid: implications for new models of reimbursement.医生对薪酬支付方式缺乏了解:对新型报销模式的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14;173(18):1745-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9270.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality.电子健康记录与临床决策支持系统:对国家门诊医疗质量的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 23;171(10):897-903. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.527. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
2
Physician compensation, cost, and quality.医生薪酬、成本与质量。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 18;304(7):795-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1174.
3
Effect of physician-specific pay-for-performance incentives in a large group practice.医师个体绩效薪酬激励对大型团体执业的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Feb 1;16(2):e35-42.
4
The effect of a PPO pay-for-performance program on patients with diabetes.按服务付费的 PPO 方案对糖尿病患者的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):e11-9.
5
Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial.公开报告卡对改善心脏护理质量的有效性:EFFECT研究:一项随机试验
JAMA. 2009 Dec 2;302(21):2330-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1731. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
6
Primary care visit duration and quality: does good care take longer?初级保健就诊时长与质量:优质护理是否耗时更长?
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1866-72. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.341.
7
Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England.绩效薪酬对英格兰初级医疗服务质量的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):368-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0807651.
8
Taking stock of pay-for-performance: a candid assessment from the front lines.从一线角度对按效付费进行评估。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):517-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.517.
9
A randomized trial of a pay-for-performance program targeting clinician referral to a state tobacco quitline.一项针对临床医生转介患者至州戒烟热线的按绩效付费计划的随机试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 13;168(18):1993-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.18.1993.
10
The impact of pay-for-performance on health care quality in Massachusetts, 2001-2003.2001 - 2003年绩效薪酬对马萨诸塞州医疗质量的影响
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jul-Aug;27(4):1167-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1167.