• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三个国家急诊医师对急性呼吸道疾病临床决策规则的需求调查。

Survey of emergency physicians' requirements for a clinical decision rule for acute respiratory illnesses in three countries.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

CJEM. 2012 Mar;14(2):83-9. doi: 10.2310/8000.2012.110552.

DOI:10.2310/8000.2012.110552
PMID:22554439
Abstract

UNLABELLED

ABSTRACTObjective:There are currently no widely used guidelines to determine which older patients with acute respiratory conditions require hospital admission. This study assessed the need for clinical decision rules to help determine whether hospital admission is required for patients over 50 years for three common respiratory conditions: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure (HF), and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

DESIGN

Postal survey.

SETTING

Emergency physicians (EPs) from the United States, Canada, and Australasia.

PARTICIPANTS

A random sample of EPs from the United States, Canada, and Australasia.

INTERVENTIONS

A modified Dillman technique with a prenotification letter and up to three postal surveys.

MAIN OUTCOMES

EP opinions regarding the need for and willingness to use clinical decision rules for emergency department (ED) patients over 50 years with COPD, HF, or CAP to predict hospital admission. We assessed the required sensitivity of each rule for return ED visit or death within 14 days.

RESULTS

A total of 801 responses from 1,493 surveys were received, with response rates of 55%, 60%, and 46% for Australasia, Canada, and the United States, respectively. Over 90% of EPs reported that they would consider using clinical decision rules for HF, CAP, and COPD. The median required sensitivity for death within 14 days was 97 to 98% for all conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

EPs are likely to adopt highly sensitive clinical decision rules to predict the need for hospital admission for patients over 50 years with COPD, HF, or CAP.

摘要

目的

目前尚无广泛使用的指南来确定哪些患有急性呼吸系统疾病的老年患者需要住院治疗。本研究评估了临床决策规则的需求,以帮助确定对于 COPD、心力衰竭 (HF) 和社区获得性肺炎 (CAP) 这三种常见呼吸系统疾病,是否需要对 50 岁以上的患者进行住院治疗。

设计

邮寄调查。

地点

来自美国、加拿大和澳大拉西亚的急诊医生 (EP)。

参与者

来自美国、加拿大和澳大拉西亚的 EP 随机样本。

干预措施

使用经改良的 Dillman 技术,先发送预先通知信,然后再发送三封邮件。

主要结果

EP 对是否需要以及是否愿意使用针对 50 岁以上患有 COPD、HF 或 CAP 的急诊科患者的临床决策规则来预测住院治疗的意见。我们评估了每种规则对 14 天内返回急诊科就诊或死亡的预测所需的敏感性。

结果

共收到 1493 份调查问卷中的 801 份回复,澳大利亚、加拿大和美国的回复率分别为 55%、60%和 46%。超过 90%的 EP 报告称,他们可能会考虑使用临床决策规则来治疗 HF、CAP 和 COPD。所有情况下,预测 14 天内死亡所需的敏感性中位数均为 97%至 98%。

结论

EP 可能会采用高度敏感的临床决策规则来预测是否需要对 50 岁以上患有 COPD、HF 或 CAP 的患者进行住院治疗。

相似文献

1
Survey of emergency physicians' requirements for a clinical decision rule for acute respiratory illnesses in three countries.三个国家急诊医师对急性呼吸道疾病临床决策规则的需求调查。
CJEM. 2012 Mar;14(2):83-9. doi: 10.2310/8000.2012.110552.
2
An international view of how recent-onset atrial fibrillation is treated in the emergency department.国际视角下的急诊科新发心房颤动的治疗方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;19(11):1255-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12016.
3
Emergency physicians' management of transient ischemic attack and desired sensitivity of a clinical decision rule for stroke in three countries.急诊医师对短暂性脑缺血发作的处理及三个国家对脑卒中临床决策规则的期望敏感度。
CJEM. 2011 Jan;13(1):19-27. doi: 10.2310/8000.2011.100269.
4
International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule.急诊医师对加拿大颈椎规则和加拿大头部计算机断层扫描规则的认知与应用的国际调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00265.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
5
An international study of emergency physicians' practice for acute headache management and the need for a clinical decision rule.一项关于急诊医生急性头痛管理实践及临床决策规则需求的国际研究。
CJEM. 2009 Nov;11(6):516-22. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011775.
6
International survey of emergency physicians' priorities for clinical decision rules.急诊医生对临床决策规则优先事项的国际调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;15(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00035.x.
7
Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries.测量临床决策规则的可接受性:在四个国家验证渥太华决策规则可接受性工具(OADRI)。
Med Decis Making. 2010 May-Jun;30(3):398-408. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09344747. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
8
Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice.“现实世界中的”临床决策规则:一项广泛传播的规则在日常实践中的应用方式。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):948-56. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.024. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
9
Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography.急诊医生对用于放射检查的临床决策规则的态度及使用情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):134-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02598.x.
10
Australasian respiratory and emergency physicians do not use the pneumonia severity index in community-acquired pneumonia.澳大利亚呼吸和急诊医师协会不使用肺炎严重指数来评估社区获得性肺炎。
Respirology. 2013 Feb;18(2):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02275.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Putting Meaning into Meaningful Use: A Roadmap to Successful Integration of Evidence at the Point of Care.将意义融入有意义的使用中:在护理点成功整合证据的路线图。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 May 19;4(2):e16. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4553.
2
Comparison of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE rules for children with minor head injury: a prospective cohort study.小儿轻度头部损伤的PECARN、CATCH和CHALICE规则比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;64(2):145-52, 152.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.030. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
3
Risk prediction models for mortality in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review.
社区获得性肺炎病死率风险预测模型:系统综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:504136. doi: 10.1155/2013/504136. Epub 2013 Oct 21.