Suppr超能文献

小脑参与运动适应,但不参与感觉适应。

Cerebellar involvement in motor but not sensory adaptation.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.034. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

Abstract

Predictable sensorimotor perturbations can lead to cerebellum-dependent adaptation--i.e., recalibration of the relationship between sensory input and motor output. Here we asked if the cerebellum is also needed to recalibrate the relationship between two sensory modalities, vision and proprioception. We studied how people with and without cerebellar damage use visual and proprioceptive signals to estimate their hand's position when the sensory estimates disagree. Theoretically, the brain may resolve the discrepancy by recalibrating the relationship between estimates (sensory realignment). Alternatively, the misalignment may be dealt with by relying less on one sensory estimate and more on the other (a weighting strategy). To address this question, we studied subjects with cerebellar damage and healthy controls as they performed a series of tasks. The first was a prism adaptation task that involves motor adaptation to compensate for a visual perturbation and is known to require the cerebellum. As expected, people with cerebellar damage were impaired relative to controls. The same subjects then performed two experiments in which they reached to visual and proprioceptive targets while a visuoproprioceptive misalignment was gradually imposed. Surprisingly, cerebellar patients performed as well as controls when the task invoked only sensory realignment, but were impaired relative to controls when motor adaptation was also possible. Additionally, individuals with cerebellar damage were able to use a weighting strategy similarly to controls. These results demonstrate that, unlike motor adaptation, sensory realignment and weighting are not cerebellum-dependent.

摘要

可预测的感觉运动干扰会导致小脑依赖性适应,即重新校准感觉输入和运动输出之间的关系。在这里,我们想知道小脑是否也需要重新校准两种感觉模式(视觉和本体感觉)之间的关系。我们研究了小脑损伤患者和健康对照组如何在感觉估计不一致时使用视觉和本体感觉信号来估计手的位置。从理论上讲,大脑可能通过重新校准估计之间的关系(感觉重新校准)来解决差异。或者,通过减少对一种感觉估计的依赖,更多地依赖另一种感觉估计(权重策略)来处理这种不匹配。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了小脑损伤患者和健康对照组在执行一系列任务时的情况。第一个任务是棱镜适应任务,它涉及到运动适应以补偿视觉干扰,这是已知需要小脑参与的。正如预期的那样,与对照组相比,小脑损伤患者的表现较差。同样的受试者然后进行了两项实验,在实验中他们到达视觉和本体感觉目标,同时逐渐引入视觉本体感觉不匹配。令人惊讶的是,当任务只调用感觉重新校准时,小脑损伤患者的表现与对照组一样好,但当也可能进行运动适应时,他们的表现则不如对照组。此外,小脑损伤患者能够像对照组一样使用权重策略。这些结果表明,与运动适应不同,感觉重新校准和权重策略不受小脑依赖。

相似文献

1
Cerebellar involvement in motor but not sensory adaptation.小脑参与运动适应,但不参与感觉适应。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.034. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
8
Sensory weighting and realignment: independent compensatory processes.感觉权重和重新调整:独立的补偿过程。
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;106(1):59-70. doi: 10.1152/jn.00641.2010. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

7
Visuo-proprioceptive recalibration and the sensorimotor map.视动本体感觉再校准与感觉运动图。
J Neurophysiol. 2023 May 1;129(5):1249-1258. doi: 10.1152/jn.00493.2022. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
9
Vision for Perception and Vision for Action in Space Travelers.太空旅行者的感知视觉与行动视觉。
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 11;13:806578. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.806578. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensory weighting and realignment: independent compensatory processes.感觉权重和重新调整:独立的补偿过程。
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;106(1):59-70. doi: 10.1152/jn.00641.2010. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
2
Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.运动学习过程中的灵活认知策略。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1001096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001096. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
7
Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.感觉统合不会导致感觉校准。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 5;103(49):18781-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607687103. Epub 2006 Nov 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验