Miall R Chris, Afanasyeva Daria, Cole Jonathan D, Mason Peggy
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Centre of Postgraduate Research and Education, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jul;239(7):2043-2061. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06110-y. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
Studies of chronically deafferented participants have illuminated how regaining some motor control after adult-onset loss of proprioceptive and touch input depends heavily on cognitive control. In this study we contrasted the performance of one such man, IW, with KS, a woman born without any somatosensory fibres. We postulated that her life-long absence of proprioception and touch might have allowed her to automate some simple visually-guided actions, something IW appears unable to achieve. We tested these two, and two age-matched control groups, on writing and drawing tasks performed with and without an audio-verbal echoing task that added a cognitive demand. In common with other studies of skilled action, the dual task was shown to affect visuo-motor performance in controls, with less well-controlled drawing and writing, evident as increases in path speed and reduction in curvature and trial duration. We found little evidence that IW was able to automate even the simplest drawing tasks and no evidence for automaticity in his writing. In contrast, KS showed a selective increase in speed of signature writing under the dual-task conditions, suggesting some ability to automate her most familiar writing. We also tested tracing of templates under mirror-reversed conditions, a task that imposes a powerful cognitive planning challenge. Both IW and KS showed evidence of a visuo-motor planning conflict, as did the controls, for shapes with sharp corners. Overall, IW was much faster than his controls to complete tracing shapes, consistent with an absence of visuo-proprioceptive conflict, whereas KS was slower than her controls, especially as the corners became sharper. She dramatically improved after a short period of practice while IW did not. We conclude that KS, who developed from birth without proprioception, may have some visually derived control of movement not under cognitive control, something not seen in IW. This allowed her to automate some writing and drawing actions, but impaired her initial attempts at mirror-tracing. In contrast, IW, who lost somatosensation as an adult, cannot automate these visually guided actions.
对长期去传入神经的参与者的研究揭示了成年后本体感觉和触觉输入丧失后重新获得一些运动控制如何在很大程度上依赖于认知控制。在本研究中,我们将这样一名男性IW的表现与KS进行了对比,KS是一名天生没有任何躯体感觉纤维的女性。我们推测,她终生缺乏本体感觉和触觉可能使她能够自动执行一些简单的视觉引导动作,而IW似乎无法做到这一点。我们对这两人以及两个年龄匹配的对照组进行了测试,测试内容是在有和没有增加认知需求的音频言语回声任务的情况下进行书写和绘画任务。与其他关于熟练动作的研究一样,双重任务被证明会影响对照组的视觉运动表现,绘画和书写的控制变差,表现为路径速度增加、曲率和试验持续时间减少。我们几乎没有发现证据表明IW能够自动执行即使是最简单的绘画任务,也没有发现他书写时存在自动性的证据。相比之下,KS在双重任务条件下签名书写速度有选择性地提高,表明她有一定能力自动执行她最熟悉的书写。我们还测试了在镜像反转条件下对模板的追踪,这是一项带来强大认知规划挑战的任务。IW和KS以及对照组在追踪有尖角的形状时都表现出视觉运动规划冲突的证据。总体而言,IW完成追踪形状的速度比他的对照组快得多,这与缺乏视觉本体感觉冲突一致,而KS比她的对照组慢,尤其是随着角变得更尖。经过短时间练习后,她有了显著改善,而IW则没有。我们得出结论,KS从出生就没有本体感觉,可能对运动有一些非认知控制的视觉衍生控制,这在IW身上没有观察到。这使她能够自动执行一些书写和绘画动作,但损害了她最初的镜像追踪尝试。相比之下,成年后失去躯体感觉的IW无法自动执行这些视觉引导动作。