• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较公立和私立医疗机构前列腺癌流行病学特征和初始治疗模式:巴西泌尿外科学会调查。

Comparison of the epidemiologic features and patterns of initial care for prostate cancer between public and private institutions: a survey by the Brazilian Society of Urology.

机构信息

Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, Section Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2012 Mar-Apr;38(2):155-64; discussion 164-6. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382012000200003.

DOI:10.1590/s1677-55382012000200003
PMID:22555039
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiological features and patterns of initial care for prostate cancer at public and private institutions in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,082 physicians affiliated to the Sao Paulo Section of the Brazilian Society of Urology were invited to participate in this cross-sectional, web-based survey. Between September 2004 and September 2005, participating urologists entered data on demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in their practice. Data on patients attended at public institutions were analyzed and compared with those patients attended at private practice.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten society members contributed with data from 1915 patients, 1026 (53.6%) of whom from public institutions. When compared with patients attended at private institutions, those attended at public institutions were older and more likely to be black, had higher serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, had a higher probability of being diagnosed with metastatic disease, but were less likely to undergo prostatectomy (all P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age, biopsy Gleason score, and being attended at a public institution were independently associated with metastatic disease upon diagnosis. The significant predictors of nonsurgical treatment were age, black race, and higher serum levels of PSA.

CONCLUSIONS

A statewide registry provides valuable information regarding patient demographics, clinical features, and patterns of care. The results of this study suggest that significant disparities exist for patients with prostate cancer attended at different health-care systems. The relative contribution of biological versus socioeconomic features remains uncertain.

摘要

目的

描述巴西圣保罗州公立和私立机构前列腺癌初始治疗的流行病学特征和模式。

材料和方法

共邀请了 1082 名隶属于巴西泌尿外科学会圣保罗分会的医生参与这项横断面、基于网络的调查。在 2004 年 9 月至 2005 年 9 月期间,参与的泌尿科医生输入了他们实践中诊断为前列腺癌患者的人口统计学、临床和病理特征数据。分析了在公立机构就诊的患者的数据,并与在私人诊所就诊的患者进行了比较。

结果

110 名学会成员提供了来自 1915 名患者的数据,其中 1026 名(53.6%)来自公立机构。与在私立机构就诊的患者相比,在公立机构就诊的患者年龄更大,更可能是黑人,血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平更高,更有可能被诊断为转移性疾病,但接受前列腺切除术的可能性较小(均 P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,年龄、活检 Gleason 评分和在公立机构就诊与诊断时的转移性疾病独立相关。非手术治疗的显著预测因素是年龄、黑种人种族和更高的血清 PSA 水平。

结论

全州范围的登记提供了有关患者人口统计学、临床特征和治疗模式的有价值信息。这项研究的结果表明,在不同医疗保健系统就诊的前列腺癌患者之间存在显著差异。生物学和社会经济特征的相对贡献仍不确定。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the epidemiologic features and patterns of initial care for prostate cancer between public and private institutions: a survey by the Brazilian Society of Urology.比较公立和私立医疗机构前列腺癌流行病学特征和初始治疗模式:巴西泌尿外科学会调查。
Int Braz J Urol. 2012 Mar-Apr;38(2):155-64; discussion 164-6. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382012000200003.
2
Differences in treatment choices for localised prostate cancer diagnosed in private and public health services.在私人和公共医疗服务机构诊断出的局限性前列腺癌的治疗选择方面存在差异。
Med J Aust. 2020 Nov;213(9):411-417. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50794. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
3
Urologists' personal feelings on PSA screening and prostate cancer treatment.泌尿科医生对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查和前列腺癌治疗的个人看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Aug;20(4):408-10. doi: 10.1111/jep.12149. Epub 2014 May 5.
4
Physician's sociodemographic profile and distribution across public and private health care: an insight into physicians' dual practice in Brazil.医生的社会人口学特征及其在公共和私营医疗保健领域的分布:对巴西医生双重执业情况的洞察。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3076-z.
5
Preferences in the management of high-risk prostate cancer among urologists in Europe: results of a web-based survey.欧洲泌尿外科医生对高危前列腺癌管理的偏好:一项基于网络调查的结果
BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115(4):571-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12796. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
6
Differences in practice patterns between urologists and radiation oncologists in the management of localized prostate cancer: a cross-sectional survey.泌尿外科医生和放射肿瘤学家在局限性前列腺癌管理方面的实践模式差异:一项横断面调查。
World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1741-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1543-2. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
7
Effect of practice integration between urologists and radiation oncologists on prostate cancer treatment patterns.泌尿科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间实践整合对前列腺癌治疗模式的影响。
J Urol. 2013 Jul;190(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.103. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
8
Early diagnosis of prostate cancer in the Western Cape.西开普省前列腺癌的早期诊断
S Afr Med J. 2001 Aug;91(8):679-84.
9
Factors associated with treatment received by men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Queensland, Australia.与澳大利亚昆士兰州被诊断患有前列腺癌的男性所接受治疗相关的因素。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E712-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.011533.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.使用基于前列腺特异性抗原密度和活检Gleason评分的新型风险分组系统改善根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险分层。
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):110-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequities in prostate cancer care: private versus public treatment settings pose a significant impact on overall survival.前列腺癌治疗中的社会经济不平等:私立与公立治疗环境对总体生存率有重大影响。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 2;23:eAO0851. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO0851. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of Funding Source on Long-Term Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Analysis of a Large Public Database From Sao Paulo, Brazil.资金来源对前列腺癌长期预后的影响:来自巴西圣保罗的大型公共数据库分析
JCO Glob Oncol. 2025 Feb;11:e2400271. doi: 10.1200/GO-24-00271. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Health seeking behaviours and private sector delivery of care for non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
健康寻求行为和中低收入国家非传染性疾病的私营部门医疗服务提供:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10464-0.
4
Prostate Cancer in Latin America: Challenges and Recommendations.拉丁美洲的前列腺癌:挑战与建议。
Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820915720. doi: 10.1177/1073274820915720.
5
Prostate cancer screening among elderly men in Brazil: should we diagnose or not?巴西老年男性的前列腺癌筛查:我们应该诊断还是不诊断?
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jan-Feb;46(1):34-41. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0022.
6
Describing mortality trends for major cancer sites in 133 intermediate regions of Brazil and an ecological study of its causes.描述巴西 133 个中间区域主要癌症部位的死亡率趋势及其病因的生态学研究。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 11;19(1):940. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6184-1.
7
Identifying quality of life indicators to improve outpatient pharmacy services for prostate cancer patients: a comparison between Brazilian and British experiences.确定生活质量指标,以改善前列腺癌患者的门诊药房服务:巴西和英国经验的比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 May-Jun;45(3):435-448. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0553.
8
Prostate cancer in Brazil and Latin America: epidemiology and screening.巴西和拉丁美洲的前列腺癌:流行病学与筛查
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):1081-1090. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0690.
9
Gleason score and tumor laterality in radical prostatectomy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a comparative study.根治性前列腺切除术与经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检中的Gleason评分及肿瘤侧别:一项对比研究。
Asian J Androl. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(5):815-20. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.146970.
10
Cyclin D1 expression in prostate carcinoma.细胞周期蛋白D1在前列腺癌中的表达。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2014 Jun;47(6):515-21. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20143240. Epub 2014 May 2.