Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000, DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000, DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10464-0.
Globally, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity placing a huge burden on individuals, families and health systems, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This rising disease burden calls for policy responses that engage the entire health care system. This study aims to synthesize evidence on how people with NCDs choose their healthcare providers in LMICs, and the outcomes of these choices, with a focus on private sector delivery.
A systematic search for literature following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. We extracted and synthesised data on the determinants and outcomes of private health care utilisation for NCDs in LMICs. A quality and risk of bias assessment was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).
We identified 115 studies for inclusion. Findings on determinants and outcomes were heterogenous, often based on a particular country context, disease, and provider. The most reported determinants of seeking private NCD care were patients having a higher socioeconomic status; greater availability of services, staff and medicines; convenience including proximity and opening hours; shorter waiting times and perceived quality. Transitioning between public and private facilities is common. Costs to patients were usually far higher in the private sector for both inpatient and outpatient settings. The quality of NCD care seems mixed depending on the disease, facility size and location, as well as the aspect of quality assessed.
Given the limited, mixed and context specific evidence currently available, adapting health service delivery models to respond to NCDs remains a challenge in LMICs. More robust research on health seeking behaviours and outcomes, especially through large multi-country surveys, is needed to inform the effective design of mixed health care systems that effectively engage both public and private providers.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42022340059 .
在全球范围内,非传染性疾病(NCDs)是导致死亡和发病的主要原因,给个人、家庭和卫生系统带来了巨大负担,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。这种不断增加的疾病负担需要采取政策措施,让整个卫生保健系统都参与进来。本研究旨在综合有关 LMICs 中 NCD 患者如何选择医疗保健提供者及其选择结果的证据,重点关注私营部门的服务提供。
按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统的文献搜索。我们提取并综合了有关 LMICs 中 NCD 私营医疗保健利用的决定因素和结果的数据。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)对质量和偏倚风险进行了评估。
我们确定了 115 项纳入研究。关于决定因素和结果的研究结果存在差异,通常基于特定的国家背景、疾病和提供者。寻求私营 NCD 护理的最常见决定因素是患者具有较高的社会经济地位;服务、人员和药物的可用性更高;包括接近度和营业时间在内的便利性;较短的等待时间和感知质量。在公共和私营设施之间过渡是很常见的。对于住院和门诊患者,私营部门的费用通常要高得多。NCD 护理的质量似乎因疾病、设施规模和位置以及评估的质量方面而异而有所不同。
鉴于目前可用的证据有限、混杂且具有特定背景,在 LMICs 中调整卫生服务提供模式以应对 NCD 仍然是一个挑战。需要进行更有力的健康寻求行为和结果研究,特别是通过大型多国调查,为有效设计既能有效利用公共和私营提供者的混合卫生保健系统提供信息。
PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42022340059。