Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Med Eng Phys. 2012 Jul;34(6):777-80. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 May 3.
In in vitro studies of the lumbar spine simplified loading modes (compressive follower force, pure moment) are usually employed to simulate the standard load cases flexion-extension, axial rotation and lateral bending of the upper body. However, the magnitudes of these loads vary widely in the literature. Thus the results of current studies may lead to unrealistic values and are hardly comparable. It is still unknown which load magnitudes lead to a realistic simulation of maximum lateral bending. A validated finite element model of the lumbar spine was used in an optimisation study to determine which magnitudes of the compressive follower force and bending moment deliver results that fit best with averaged in vivo data. The best agreement with averaged in vivo measured data was found for a compressive follower force of 700 N and a lateral bending moment of 7.8 Nm. These results show that loading modes that differ strongly from the optimised one may not realistically simulate maximum lateral bending. The simplified but in vitro applicable loading cannot perfectly mimic the in vivo situation. However, the optimised magnitudes are those which agree best with averaged in vivo measured data. Its consequent application would lead to a better comparability of different investigations.
在腰椎的体外研究中,通常采用简化的加载方式(压缩跟随力、纯力矩)来模拟上身屈伸、轴向旋转和侧屈的标准载荷情况。然而,这些载荷的大小在文献中差异很大。因此,目前研究的结果可能导致不现实的值,并且几乎无法比较。目前还不清楚哪些载荷大小会导致对最大侧屈的真实模拟。使用经过验证的腰椎有限元模型进行了优化研究,以确定压缩跟随力和弯矩的大小,使其结果与平均体内数据拟合得最好。与平均体内测量数据的最佳一致性是在 700N 的压缩跟随力和 7.8Nm 的侧屈力矩下获得的。这些结果表明,与优化后的加载方式有很大差异的加载方式可能无法真实模拟最大侧屈。简化但可在体外应用的加载方式不能完全模拟体内情况。然而,优化后的幅度与平均体内测量数据最吻合。因此,它的应用将提高不同研究之间的可比性。