van der Merwe A E, Maat G J R, Watt I
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, LUMC S-1-P, P.O. Box 96002, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Homo. 2012 Jun;63(3):202-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 May 5.
Clinically, the presence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) has been linked to a disturbance of glucose and insulin metabolism, hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity associated with a rich diet. The prevalence of DISH in archaeological skeletal samples may therefore be a valuable indicator of their socio-economic status when compared to other contemporary groups. However, various methods are currently being used to diagnose DISH. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess the comparability of results obtained using four different diagnostic methods to estimate the prevalence of DISH in a skeletal sample, and to discuss the implications of the results in relation to palaeopathological health assessments. Four different diagnostic criteria were applied to 127 male and 113 female skeletons to diagnose DISH. Skeletal remains were obtained from two 16th century samples from Delft and one modern sample from the anatomy dissection hall of the Leiden University Medical Centre. The estimated prevalences were statistically compared. Special attention was also given to the distribution of extra-spinal enthesophytes described in diagnostic criteria, in order to assess their diagnostic value. The prevalence of DISH observed in the skeletal samples varied significantly depending on the criteria used for diagnosis. Furthermore, extra-spinal enthesophytes, suggested as being indicative of DISH, proved to be variable and unreliable. It was concluded that it is of great importance to explicitly state and adhere to criteria employed for diagnosing DISH in both palaeopathological and clinical investigations in order to ensure reliable comparisons between studies. Also, DISH cannot be positively diagnosed solely based on the presence of extra-spinal enthesophytes.
临床上,弥漫性特发性骨肥厚(DISH)的存在与葡萄糖和胰岛素代谢紊乱、高血压、血脂异常以及与丰富饮食相关的肥胖有关。因此,与其他当代群体相比,考古骨骼样本中DISH的患病率可能是其社会经济地位的一个有价值指标。然而,目前使用了各种方法来诊断DISH。因此,本研究的目的是评估使用四种不同诊断方法估计骨骼样本中DISH患病率所获得结果的可比性,并讨论这些结果在古病理学健康评估方面的意义。将四种不同的诊断标准应用于127具男性骨骼和113具女性骨骼以诊断DISH。骨骼遗骸来自代尔夫特的两个16世纪样本和莱顿大学医学中心解剖学解剖室的一个现代样本。对估计的患病率进行了统计学比较。还特别关注了诊断标准中描述的脊柱外附着点骨赘的分布,以评估其诊断价值。根据用于诊断的标准不同,骨骼样本中观察到的DISH患病率差异显著。此外,被认为是DISH指示性特征的脊柱外附着点骨赘被证明是可变且不可靠的。得出的结论是,在古病理学和临床研究中明确陈述并遵守用于诊断DISH的标准非常重要,以确保研究之间进行可靠的比较。此外,不能仅根据脊柱外附着点骨赘的存在就确诊DISH。