• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过全局结构比对和局部几何精修来识别蛋白-配体结合位点。

Recognizing protein-ligand binding sites by global structural alignment and local geometry refinement.

机构信息

Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2218, USA.

出版信息

Structure. 2012 Jun 6;20(6):987-97. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.str.2012.03.009
PMID:22560732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3372652/
Abstract

Proteins perform functions through interacting with other molecules. However, structural details for most of the protein-ligand interactions are unknown. We present a comparative approach (COFACTOR) to recognize functional sites of protein-ligand interactions using low-resolution protein structural models, based on a global-to-local sequence and structural comparison algorithm. COFACTOR was tested on 501 proteins, which harbor 582 natural and drug-like ligand molecules. Starting from I-TASSER structure predictions, the method successfully identifies ligand-binding pocket locations for 65% of apo receptors with an average distance error 2 Å. The average precision of binding-residue assignments is 46% and 137% higher than that by FINDSITE and ConCavity. In CASP9, COFACTOR achieved a binding-site prediction precision 72% and Matthews correlation coefficient 0.69 for 31 blind test proteins, which was significantly higher than all other participating methods. These data demonstrate the power of structure-based approaches to protein-ligand interaction predictions applicable for genome-wide structural and functional annotations.

摘要

蛋白质通过与其他分子相互作用来执行功能。然而,大多数蛋白质-配体相互作用的结构细节尚不清楚。我们提出了一种基于全局到局部序列和结构比较算法的比较方法(COFACTOR),用于识别蛋白质-配体相互作用的功能位点,使用低分辨率的蛋白质结构模型。COFACTOR 在 501 个蛋白质上进行了测试,这些蛋白质含有 582 个天然和类药配体分子。从 I-TASSER 结构预测开始,该方法成功地确定了 65%的apo 受体的配体结合口袋位置,平均距离误差为 2Å。结合残基分配的平均精度比 FINDSITE 和 ConCavity 分别高 46%和 137%。在 CASP9 中,COFACTOR 对 31 个盲测蛋白质的结合位点预测精度为 72%,马修斯相关系数为 0.69,明显高于所有其他参与方法。这些数据表明,基于结构的方法在蛋白质-配体相互作用预测方面具有强大的作用,适用于全基因组的结构和功能注释。

相似文献

1
Recognizing protein-ligand binding sites by global structural alignment and local geometry refinement.通过全局结构比对和局部几何精修来识别蛋白-配体结合位点。
Structure. 2012 Jun 6;20(6):987-97. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 3.
2
Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment.利用互补结合特异性亚结构比较和序列轮廓比对识别蛋白质-配体结合位点。
Bioinformatics. 2013 Oct 15;29(20):2588-95. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt447. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
3
Assessment of ligand-binding residue predictions in CASP9.评估 CASP9 中配体结合残基预测。
Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):126-36. doi: 10.1002/prot.23174. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
4
FunFOLD: an improved automated method for the prediction of ligand binding residues using 3D models of proteins.FunFOLD:一种改进的基于蛋白质 3D 模型预测配体结合残基的自动化方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 May 16;12:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-160.
5
Preparation and refinement of model protein-ligand complexes.模型蛋白质-配体复合物的制备与优化
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;857:351-73. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-588-6_16.
6
FINDSITE: a threading-based approach to ligand homology modeling.FINDSITE:一种基于穿线法的配体同源建模方法。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000405. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
7
BSP-SLIM: a blind low-resolution ligand-protein docking approach using predicted protein structures.BSP-SLIM:一种基于预测蛋白结构的盲配体-蛋白低分辨率对接方法。
Proteins. 2012 Jan;80(1):93-110. doi: 10.1002/prot.23165. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
8
Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.Q-SiteFinder:一种基于能量的蛋白质-配体结合位点预测方法。
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):1908-16. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti315. Epub 2005 Feb 8.
9
COFACTOR: an accurate comparative algorithm for structure-based protein function annotation.共因子:一种基于结构的蛋白质功能注释的准确比较算法。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jul;40(Web Server issue):W471-7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks372. Epub 2012 May 8.
10
Protein Structure and Function Prediction Using I-TASSER.使用I-TASSER进行蛋白质结构与功能预测
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2015 Dec 17;52:5.8.1-5.8.15. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0508s52.

引用本文的文献

1
A graphic and command line protocol for quick and accurate comparisons of protein and nucleic acid structures with US-align.一种用于通过US-align快速准确比较蛋白质和核酸结构的图形化及命令行协议。
Nat Protoc. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41596-025-01189-x.
2
MecE, MecB, and MecC proteins orchestrate methyl group transfer during dichloromethane fermentation.MecE、MecB 和 MecC 蛋白在二氯甲烷发酵过程中协调甲基转移。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Oct 23;90(10):e0097824. doi: 10.1128/aem.00978-24. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Turbocharging protein binding site prediction with geometric attention, inter-resolution transfer learning, and homology-based augmentation.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of ligand-binding residue predictions in CASP9.评估 CASP9 中配体结合残基预测。
Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):126-36. doi: 10.1002/prot.23174. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
2
Binding ligand prediction for proteins using partial matching of local surface patches.利用局部表面斑块的部分匹配进行蛋白质结合配体预测。
Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(12):5009-26. doi: 10.3390/ijms11125009. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
3
Evolutionary approach to predicting the binding site residues of a protein from its primary sequence.从蛋白质的一级序列预测其结合位点残基的进化方法。
利用几何注意力、分辨率间转移学习和基于同源性的增强技术来提高蛋白质结合位点预测的性能。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2024 Sep 20;25(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05923-2.
4
Combined Physics- and Machine-Learning-Based Method to Identify Druggable Binding Sites Using SILCS-Hotspots.基于物理和机器学习的联合方法,利用 SILCS-Hotspots 识别可成药结合位点。
J Chem Inf Model. 2024 Oct 14;64(19):7743-7757. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01189. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
5
Databases of ligand-binding pockets and protein-ligand interactions.配体结合口袋和蛋白质-配体相互作用的数据库。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Mar 24;23:1320-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.03.015. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.蛋白质三级结构预测的最新进展。
Molecules. 2024 Feb 13;29(4):832. doi: 10.3390/molecules29040832.
7
Intrinsic disorder in the open reading frame 2 of hepatitis E virus: a protein with multiple functions beyond viral capsid.戊型肝炎病毒开放阅读框2中的内在无序性:一种具有病毒衣壳以外多种功能的蛋白质。
J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2023 Mar 16;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s43141-023-00477-x.
8
Simulation and Machine Learning Methods for Ion-Channel Structure Determination, Mechanistic Studies and Drug Design.用于离子通道结构测定、机理研究和药物设计的模拟与机器学习方法
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 28;13:939555. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.939555. eCollection 2022.
9
Machine learning assessment of the binding region as a tool for more efficient computational receptor-ligand docking.作为一种提高计算受体-配体对接效率的工具,对结合区域进行机器学习评估。
J Mol Liq. 2022 May 1;353. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118759. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
10
Identification of Iron-Sulfur (Fe-S) Cluster and Zinc (Zn) Binding Sites Within Proteomes Predicted by DeepMind's AlphaFold2 Program Dramatically Expands the Metalloproteome.通过DeepMind的AlphaFold2程序预测蛋白质组中铁硫(Fe-S)簇和锌(Zn)结合位点,极大地扩展了金属蛋白质组。
J Mol Biol. 2022 Jan 30;434(2):167377. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167377. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 29;108(13):5313-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102210108. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
4
The RCSB Protein Data Bank: redesigned web site and web services.RCSB蛋白质数据库:重新设计的网站和网络服务。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D392-401. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1021. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
5
Comparative evaluation of 3D virtual ligand screening methods: impact of the molecular alignment on enrichment.3D 虚拟配体筛选方法的比较评估:分子定向对富集的影响。
J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Jun 28;50(6):992-1004. doi: 10.1021/ci900507g.
6
3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures.3DLigandSite:使用相似结构预测配体结合位点。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jul;38(Web Server issue):W469-73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq406. Epub 2010 May 31.
7
I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction.I-TASSER:一个用于自动化蛋白质结构和功能预测的统一平台。
Nat Protoc. 2010 Apr;5(4):725-38. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.5. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
8
How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?蛋白质结构相似度 TM 值为 0.5 有多大意义?
Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 1;26(7):889-95. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
9
Protein interactions and ligand binding: from protein subfamilies to functional specificity.蛋白质相互作用和配体结合:从蛋白质亚家族到功能特异性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 2;107(5):1995-2000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908044107. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
10
Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure.通过结合进化序列保守性和 3D 结构预测蛋白质配体结合位点。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000585. Epub 2009 Dec 4.