Cumberland Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
J ECT. 2012 Dec;28(4):229-33. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318255a3b6.
Characterization of the ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) generated during ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is important to progress its use in routine ECT practice particularly in indicating treatment efficacy. The study compared 2- to 5-Hz and 5.2- to 13-Hz bands of the ictal EEG signal between brief- and ultrabrief-pulse ECT.
Twenty-five patients with major depression were randomized to brief- (1 millisecond [ms]) and ultrabrief-pulse (0.3 ms) right unilateral ECT. In sessions 2 to 8, when patients in either group received 6 times threshold ECT, right and left frontal ictal EEG between ultrabrief (n = 60) and brief pulse (n = 63) were compared. Electroencephalographic spectra from 2- to 5-Hz and 5.2- to 13-Hz bands in the mid and postictal phases were subjected to multitaper jackknife analysis of spectral power density (μV/Hz) and its SD or "regularity" (μV/Hz), peak spectral frequency (Hz), and its standard deviation (SD) or regularity (Hz). Linear mixed-effect models were used to compare the outcomes.
In ultrabrief ECT, spectral power density and its SD were significantly smaller within the mid seizure of both bands, whereas peak frequency and its SD were similar. Postseizure suppression of spectral power density of both bands was similar in either treatments.
Lower spectral power densities were noted with ultrabrief-pulse ECT vis-a-vis brief-pulse ECT. However, in ultrabrief pulse ECT, regularity measures and postseizure suppression were comparable to brief-pulse ECT.
描述超短脉冲电惊厥疗法(ECT)发作期脑电图(EEG)的特征对于推进其在常规 ECT 实践中的应用非常重要,特别是在指示治疗效果方面。本研究比较了短脉冲和超短脉冲 ECT 的 2-5Hz 和 5.2-13Hz 频段的发作期 EEG 信号。
25 例重度抑郁症患者被随机分为短脉冲(1 毫秒[ms])和超短脉冲(0.3ms)右侧单侧 ECT。在第 2 至 8 次治疗中,当两组患者均接受 6 次阈值 ECT 时,比较了超短脉冲(n=60)和短脉冲(n=63)右侧和左侧额部发作期 EEG。对中潜伏期和后发作期 2-5Hz 和 5.2-13Hz 频段的脑电频谱进行多导 Jackknife 分析,以获得频谱功率密度(μV/Hz)及其标准差(SD)或“规则性”(μV/Hz)、峰值频谱频率(Hz)及其标准差(SD)或规则性(Hz)。采用线性混合效应模型比较结果。
在超短脉冲 ECT 中,两个频段的中潜伏期内的频谱功率密度及其 SD 均显著降低,而峰值频率及其 SD 则相似。两种治疗方法的后发作期抑制频谱功率密度相似。
与短脉冲 ECT 相比,超短脉冲 ECT 观察到较低的频谱功率密度。然而,在超短脉冲 ECT 中,规则性测量和后发作期抑制与短脉冲 ECT 相当。