• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超短脉冲与短脉冲右侧单侧电惊厥治疗的发作期脑电图比较:多导频域自举刀切分析。

Comparison of ictal electroencephalogram between ultrabrief- and brief-pulse right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: a multitaper jackknife analysis.

机构信息

Cumberland Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J ECT. 2012 Dec;28(4):229-33. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318255a3b6.

DOI:10.1097/YCT.0b013e318255a3b6
PMID:22561549
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Characterization of the ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) generated during ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is important to progress its use in routine ECT practice particularly in indicating treatment efficacy. The study compared 2- to 5-Hz and 5.2- to 13-Hz bands of the ictal EEG signal between brief- and ultrabrief-pulse ECT.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with major depression were randomized to brief- (1 millisecond [ms]) and ultrabrief-pulse (0.3 ms) right unilateral ECT. In sessions 2 to 8, when patients in either group received 6 times threshold ECT, right and left frontal ictal EEG between ultrabrief (n = 60) and brief pulse (n = 63) were compared. Electroencephalographic spectra from 2- to 5-Hz and 5.2- to 13-Hz bands in the mid and postictal phases were subjected to multitaper jackknife analysis of spectral power density (μV/Hz) and its SD or "regularity" (μV/Hz), peak spectral frequency (Hz), and its standard deviation (SD) or regularity (Hz). Linear mixed-effect models were used to compare the outcomes.

RESULTS

In ultrabrief ECT, spectral power density and its SD were significantly smaller within the mid seizure of both bands, whereas peak frequency and its SD were similar. Postseizure suppression of spectral power density of both bands was similar in either treatments.

CONCLUSION

Lower spectral power densities were noted with ultrabrief-pulse ECT vis-a-vis brief-pulse ECT. However, in ultrabrief pulse ECT, regularity measures and postseizure suppression were comparable to brief-pulse ECT.

摘要

目的

描述超短脉冲电惊厥疗法(ECT)发作期脑电图(EEG)的特征对于推进其在常规 ECT 实践中的应用非常重要,特别是在指示治疗效果方面。本研究比较了短脉冲和超短脉冲 ECT 的 2-5Hz 和 5.2-13Hz 频段的发作期 EEG 信号。

方法

25 例重度抑郁症患者被随机分为短脉冲(1 毫秒[ms])和超短脉冲(0.3ms)右侧单侧 ECT。在第 2 至 8 次治疗中,当两组患者均接受 6 次阈值 ECT 时,比较了超短脉冲(n=60)和短脉冲(n=63)右侧和左侧额部发作期 EEG。对中潜伏期和后发作期 2-5Hz 和 5.2-13Hz 频段的脑电频谱进行多导 Jackknife 分析,以获得频谱功率密度(μV/Hz)及其标准差(SD)或“规则性”(μV/Hz)、峰值频谱频率(Hz)及其标准差(SD)或规则性(Hz)。采用线性混合效应模型比较结果。

结果

在超短脉冲 ECT 中,两个频段的中潜伏期内的频谱功率密度及其 SD 均显著降低,而峰值频率及其 SD 则相似。两种治疗方法的后发作期抑制频谱功率密度相似。

结论

与短脉冲 ECT 相比,超短脉冲 ECT 观察到较低的频谱功率密度。然而,在超短脉冲 ECT 中,规则性测量和后发作期抑制与短脉冲 ECT 相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ictal electroencephalogram between ultrabrief- and brief-pulse right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: a multitaper jackknife analysis.超短脉冲与短脉冲右侧单侧电惊厥治疗的发作期脑电图比较:多导频域自举刀切分析。
J ECT. 2012 Dec;28(4):229-33. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318255a3b6.
2
Autobiographical and subjective memory with right unilateral high-dose 0.3-millisecond ultrabrief-pulse and 1-millisecond brief-pulse electroconvulsive therapy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.右侧单侧大剂量 0.3 毫秒超短脉冲和 1 毫秒短脉冲电惊厥治疗的自传体和主观记忆:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
J ECT. 2013 Dec;29(4):277-82. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3182941baf.
3
Efficacy and cognitive side effects after brief pulse and ultrabrief pulse right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.短暂脉冲和超短脉冲右侧单侧电惊厥疗法治疗重度抑郁症的疗效和认知副作用:一项随机、双盲、对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;74(11):e1029-36. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08538.
4
Stimulus pulse-frequency-dependent efficacy and cognitive adverse effects of ultrabrief-pulse electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depression.超短脉冲电惊厥治疗对抑郁症患者的刺激脉冲频率依赖性疗效和认知不良反应。
J ECT. 2011 Jun;27(2):109-13. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181e63302.
5
Comparison of antidepressant effects between brief and ultrabrief pulse unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: brief report of a randomized double-blind trial.短脉冲和超短脉冲单侧电惊厥疗法抗抑郁效果比较:一项随机双盲试验的简短报告。
J ECT. 2011 Dec;27(4):e59-60. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318218945e.
6
Ultrabrief (0.3 ms) or brief (0.5 ms) pulses for right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: is there a difference in seizure thresholds?右侧单侧电惊厥治疗的超短(0.3 毫秒)或短(0.5 毫秒)脉冲:在惊厥阈值上是否存在差异?
J ECT. 2013 Mar;29(1):15-7. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31827134ba.
7
Seizure threshold increases can be predicted by EEG quality in right unilateral ultrabrief ECT.右侧单侧超快速电抽搐治疗中脑电图质量可预测癫痫发作阈值升高。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec;267(8):795-801. doi: 10.1007/s00406-017-0777-y. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
8
Postictal suppression correlates with therapeutic efficacy for depression in bilateral sine and pulse wave electroconvulsive therapy.发作后抑制与双侧正弦和脉冲波电休克治疗中抑郁症的治疗效果相关。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Apr;61(2):168-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01632.x.
9
Randomized comparison of ultra-brief bifrontal and unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: clinical efficacy.超短程双额叶与单侧电休克治疗重度抑郁症的随机对照研究:临床疗效
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jul;116(1-2):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.11.001. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
10
The efficacy of ultrabrief-pulse (0.25 millisecond) versus brief-pulse (0.50 millisecond) bilateral electroconvulsive therapy in major depression.超短脉冲(0.25 毫秒)与短脉冲(0.50 毫秒)双侧电惊厥疗法治疗重性抑郁症的疗效比较。
J ECT. 2011 Mar;27(1):55-8. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181da8412.

引用本文的文献

1
Elongation of pulse width as an augmentation strategy in electroconvulsive therapy.脉宽延长作为电抽搐治疗中的增效策略。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Oct 23;10:2009-14. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S67121. eCollection 2014.