From the *Department of Psychiatry, Cumberland Hospital, Westmead; †Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Sydney; ‡Department of Biostatistics, Westmead Hospita; §University of Sydney; ∥Westmead Millenium Institute; ¶Brain Dynamic Centre; and #Department of Psychiatry, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J ECT. 2013 Dec;29(4):277-82. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3182941baf.
Shortening the pulse width to 0.3 millisecond holds neurophysiological and clinical promise of making electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) safer by reducing cognitive adverse effects. The exclusive effects of pulse width on autobiographical and subjective memory are largely unstudied. The aim was to principally investigate during the acute ECT course and at 3 months after ECT autobiographical and subjective memory effects of 0.3-millisecond ultrabrief and 1-millisecond brief-pulse ECT.
Patient with severe depression were randomized to 1-millisecond brief-pulse (n = 20) or 0.3-millisecond ultrabrief-pulse (n = 20) right unilateral ECT, both at 6 times the threshold stimulus dose given thrice weekly. Autobiographical Memory Interview (Kopelman) and Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire were administered at baseline, after 8 sessions, end of the acute course, and 3 months later.
Early adult semantic memory worsened significantly over time with brief-pulse compared with ultrabrief ECT: F3,88 = 2.60, P = 0.05. There was a significant decline in brief-pulse treatment vis-à-vis a significant improvement with ultrabrief-pulse treatment with childhood semantic memory (P = 0.022), early adult semantic (P = 0.03), and recent semantic memory (P = 0.018) only at 24 hours after the eighth ECT treatment.
Clinically meaningful and significant improvement in semantic autobiographical memory occurred in ultrabrief treatment vis-à-vis brief-pulse ECT after 8 treatments. Ultrabrief treatment offered a small but significant advantage over 1-millisecond brief-pulse high-dose right unilateral ECT with early adult semantic autobiographical memory, which persisted up to 3 months.
将脉宽缩短至 0.3 毫秒有望通过减少认知不良反应使电惊厥疗法 (ECT) 更安全,这具有神经生理学和临床意义。脉宽对自传体和主观记忆的单一影响在很大程度上尚未得到研究。本研究旨在主要在急性 ECT 疗程期间和 ECT 后 3 个月,研究 0.3 毫秒超短和 1 毫秒短脉宽 ECT 对自传体和主观记忆的影响。
患有严重抑郁症的患者被随机分为 1 毫秒短脉宽(n = 20)或 0.3 毫秒超短脉宽(n = 20)右侧单侧 ECT,均使用每周三次给予 6 倍阈值刺激剂量。在基线、8 次治疗后、急性疗程结束时和 3 个月后,使用 Kopelman 自传记忆访谈和 Squire 主观记忆问卷进行评估。
与超短脉宽 ECT 相比,短脉宽 ECT 随着时间的推移显著恶化了早期成年语义记忆:F3,88 = 2.60,P = 0.05。与超短脉宽 ECT 相比,短脉宽 ECT 在治疗中出现了明显下降,而在儿童语义记忆(P = 0.022)、早期成年语义记忆(P = 0.03)和近期语义记忆(P = 0.018)方面出现了显著改善,仅在第八次 ECT 治疗后 24 小时。
在 8 次治疗后,与短脉宽 ECT 相比,超短脉宽 ECT 可显著改善语义自传体记忆。与 1 毫秒短脉宽高剂量右侧单侧 ECT 相比,超短脉宽 ECT 对早期成年语义自传体记忆具有较小但显著的优势,这种优势持续到 3 个月。