• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析欧盟拟议的关于杀生物剂产品的法规及其替代方法和 21 世纪毒理学的机会。

Analysis of the proposed EU regulation concerning biocide products and its opportunities for alternative approaches and a toxicology for the 21st century.

出版信息

ALTEX. 2012;29(2):157-72. doi: 10.14573/altex.2012.2.157.

DOI:10.14573/altex.2012.2.157
PMID:22562488
Abstract

On June 12, 2009, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation concerning the placement on the market and use of biocidal products, which, when it enters into force on January 1, 2013, will repeal and replace Directive 98/8/EC. The main reason for the revision of the current Directive was to promote best practices for environmental and human health protection, along with implementation of current developments in safety testing in order to create safer biocides. Moreover, the proposed Regulation aims to take into consideration the newest legislation on chemicals. This article evaluates the proposed Regulation in comparison to Directive 98/8/EC. Although the new proposal requires the sharing of vertebrate animal test data, both for product authorization and for newly developed active substances, it misses - in contrast to REACH - the opportunity to recognize the accelerating development of alternative approaches to animal testing, most recently with new momentum provided by "Toxicity Testing for the 21st Century", and to support the evolution of toxicology towards a new approach to testing. The new methods promise not only to decrease animal pain and suffering, but also to provide faster results and better prediction for human risk assessment compared to traditional methods. Unfortunately, methods mandated for human risk assessment in the proposal are still mainly based on traditional animal study extrapolation. We put forward and discuss possible alternative strategies, such as in vitro testing, integrated testing strategies, toxicokinetics, "omics", systems biology, bioinformatics, and computational modeling, all of which could be more encouraged by the proposal. Current opportunities to improve our tools for biocide risk assessment are discussed, delineating advantages, limitations, and development needs. It is suggested to open the proposed Regulation to alternative approaches that are based on human biology more than on extrapolation from animals to humans.

摘要

2009 年 6 月 12 日,欧盟委员会通过了一项关于在市场上投放和使用杀生物剂产品的法规提案,该提案将于 2013 年 1 月 1 日生效,届时将取代 98/8/EC 指令。修订现行指令的主要原因是为了促进环境保护和人类健康保护的最佳实践,同时实施安全测试的最新进展,以创造更安全的杀生物剂。此外,拟议的法规旨在考虑最新的化学品立法。本文将对拟议的法规与 98/8/EC 指令进行比较评估。尽管新提案要求在产品授权和新开发的活性物质方面共享脊椎动物动物测试数据,但与 REACH 不同的是,它错过了利用替代动物测试方法的最新发展的机会,最近由于“21 世纪的毒性测试”,这方面的发展势头更为强劲,并支持毒理学向新的测试方法的发展。与传统方法相比,新方法不仅有望减少动物的痛苦和苦难,而且还能提供更快的结果和更好的人类风险评估预测。不幸的是,提案中规定用于人类风险评估的方法仍然主要基于传统的动物研究外推。我们提出并讨论了可能的替代策略,如体外测试、综合测试策略、毒代动力学、“组学”、系统生物学、生物信息学和计算建模,所有这些都可以通过该提案得到更多的鼓励。讨论了当前改进杀生物剂风险评估工具的机会,阐述了优势、局限性和发展需求。建议向更多基于人体生物学而不是从动物外推到人体的替代方法开放拟议的法规。

相似文献

1
Analysis of the proposed EU regulation concerning biocide products and its opportunities for alternative approaches and a toxicology for the 21st century.分析欧盟拟议的关于杀生物剂产品的法规及其替代方法和 21 世纪毒理学的机会。
ALTEX. 2012;29(2):157-72. doi: 10.14573/altex.2012.2.157.
2
Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).实验动物安全研究的替代方法:在新的欧洲化学品法规(REACH)下化学品风险评估中的作用。
Arch Toxicol. 2008 Apr;82(4):211-36. doi: 10.1007/s00204-008-0279-9. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
3
Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.吸入毒理学中的替代测试方法:挑战与机遇
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2008 Jun;60(2-3):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 May 16.
4
From alternative methods to a new toxicology.从替代方法到新毒理学。
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011 Apr;77(3):338-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.027. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
5
Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.欧盟《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》简介。
Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Mar;34 Suppl 1:5-10.
6
Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies.当前欧盟化学品和化妆品评估的监管要求:引入新方法学的挑战和机遇。
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Jun;95(6):1867-1897. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03034-y. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
7
Considerations on Directive 98/8 of the European Commission - the biocide directive.关于欧盟委员会第98/8号指令——生物杀灭剂指令的考量
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011;18(2):452-8.
8
REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions.REACH 与生殖发育毒理学:仍有疑问。
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2012 Feb;58(1):63-9. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2011.648301.
9
Implementing Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (TT21C): Making safety decisions using toxicity pathways, and progress in a prototype risk assessment.实施21世纪毒性测试(TT21C):利用毒性途径做出安全决策及原型风险评估进展
Toxicology. 2015 Jun 5;332:102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
10
Risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals: identifying chemicals of regulatory concern.内分泌干扰化学物质风险评估:识别具有监管关注的化学物质。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;64(1):143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jun 23.