Division of General Pediatrics, Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5456, USA.
J Community Health. 2012 Dec;37(6):1164-7. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9567-7.
Underinsurance for vaccines presents financial barriers to vaccination. Preventive services coverage is of interest in national healthcare reform. To assess vaccine benefits coverage in private health plans. Private health insurance carriers were surveyed December 2008-June 2009 on policies regarding vaccine coverage in fully insured plans. Carriers were identified as multi-state, state-specific Blue Cross or local-independent carriers. Plan types included HMO, PPO, POS and 'other.' Full benefits coverage was defined as having benefits without a copay or coinsurance for a recommended vaccine. Analyses were conducted to examine associations between carrier type, plan type, and full benefits coverage. Fifty-one carriers (response rate = 56 %) provided data for 78 unique plans, reflecting over 47 million private plan enrollees. Full benefits coverage was highest for combined tetanus/diphtheria/acellular pertussis (74 %) and lower for pneumococcal conjugate (72 %), rotavirus (72 %), human papillomavirus (71 %), hepatitis A (68 %), meningococcal conjugate (67 %), inactivated influenza (67 %), live attenuated influenza (63 %) and zoster (57 %) vaccines. Compared with plans offered by state-specific Blue Cross carriers, significantly higher proportions of multi-state carriers and local independent carriers had plans with full benefits coverage for vaccines (p < 0.05). Compared with PPO and "other" plans, significantly higher proportions of HMO and POS plans had full benefits coverage for vaccines (p < 0.05). In this national study, levels of underinsurance for immunization leave room for improvement. State-specific Blue Cross plans and indemnity or high-deductible plans are least likely to offer full coverage for recently recommended vaccines, and may face changes with incorporation of "essential health benefits" requirements.
疫苗保险不足会给接种带来经济障碍。预防服务覆盖范围是国家医疗保健改革的关注点。为了评估私人健康计划中疫苗效益的覆盖范围。2008 年 12 月至 2009 年 6 月,对私人健康保险承销商进行了调查,了解其在完全保险计划中有关疫苗覆盖范围的政策。承销商被确定为多州、州特定的蓝十字或地方独立承销商。计划类型包括 HMO、PPO、POS 和“其他”。全额福利覆盖是指为推荐疫苗提供无需共付额或自付额的福利。进行了分析以检查承销商类型、计划类型和全额福利覆盖之间的关联。51 家承销商(回应率=56%)提供了 78 个独特计划的数据,反映了超过 4700 万私人计划参保人。联合破伤风/白喉/无细胞百日咳(74%)的全额福利覆盖最高,而肺炎球菌结合疫苗(72%)、轮状病毒(72%)、人乳头瘤病毒(71%)、甲型肝炎(68%)、脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(67%)、灭活流感(67%)、减毒活流感(63%)和带状疱疹(57%)疫苗的全额福利覆盖较低。与州特定的蓝十字承销商提供的计划相比,多州承销商和地方独立承销商的计划中,具有全额福利覆盖疫苗的比例显著更高(p<0.05)。与 PPO 和“其他”计划相比,HMO 和 POS 计划中具有全额福利覆盖疫苗的比例显著更高(p<0.05)。在这项全国性研究中,免疫接种保险不足的程度仍有改进空间。州特定的蓝十字计划和赔偿或高免赔额计划最不可能为最近推荐的疫苗提供全额覆盖,并且在纳入“基本健康福利”要求时可能会面临变化。