Suppr超能文献

成年智障人士先前的法律介入与当前危机之间的关系。

Relationship between prior legal involvement and current crisis for adults with intellectual disability.

作者信息

Lunsky Yona, Raina Poonam, Jones Jessica

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jun;37(2):163-8. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2012.685149.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and legal involvement are a unique population with complex needs. To date, there has been limited research exploring the demographic and clinical profiles of individuals with ID and legal involvement that are in crisis and how they differ to individuals with ID without legal involvement.

METHOD

130 adults with ID and a history of legal involvement were compared to 617 without legal involvement who had experienced at least one crisis in terms of crisis presentation and outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, those with a known history of legal involvement were younger, higher functioning and more likely to be male and living in unsupported settings. Legal history was not a significant predictor of crisis involving aggression but was a significant predictor of police response to crisis, when other variables were controlled for.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with ID and legal history may be more likely to have police respond to their crises than other individuals. Understanding the unique profiles of those with legal history can inform the development of services targeted towards offenders with ID.

摘要

背景

有智力残疾且涉及法律事务的个体是一个有着复杂需求的独特群体。迄今为止,探索处于危机中的有智力残疾且涉及法律事务的个体的人口统计学和临床特征,以及他们与未涉及法律事务的有智力残疾个体有何不同的研究有限。

方法

将130名有智力残疾且有法律事务史的成年人与617名未涉及法律事务但经历过至少一次危机的成年人在危机表现和结果方面进行比较。

结果

总体而言,有已知法律事务史的个体更年轻、功能更高,更有可能为男性且生活在无支持的环境中。在控制其他变量时,法律事务史不是涉及攻击行为危机的显著预测因素,但却是警方对危机反应的显著预测因素。

结论

有智力残疾和法律事务史的成年人在危机发生时可能比其他个体更有可能得到警方的回应。了解有法律事务史个体的独特特征可为针对有智力残疾罪犯的服务发展提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验