Department of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Vox Sang. 2012 Nov;103(4):322-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2012.01614.x. Epub 2012 May 7.
There are conflicting data regarding the therapeutic efficacy of platelets inactivated using amotosalen and ultraviolet A light. We have performed a meta-analysis to summarize the results of different randomized controlled trials (RCT).
Five RCTs reported through March 2011 met the criteria for meta-analysis. Weighted mean difference (WMD) in corrected count increment (CCI) at 1 h, CCI-24 h, and transfusion interval (days) and summary odds ratio (OR) of bleeding in inactivated platelet (I-P) group vs. noninactivated platelet (C-P) group were calculated across studies.
Randomized controlled trials were statistically homogeneous when we analysed CCI-24 h, and the transfusion of C-P was associated with a higher CCI-24 h when compared with the transfusion of I-P (WMD, 3×10(3); 95% CI, 2·32×10(3)-3·69×10(3); P<0·00001). RCTs were statistically heterogeneous when we analysed CCI-1 h, transfusion interval and OR of bleeding. Regarding the OR of bleeding in the I-P and C-P groups, it varied by as much as a multiple of four among the trials, from 0·66 to 2·66. When we combined double-blinded and high methodologic quality score RCTs, the use of I-P was not statistically associated with an increase in the OR of bleeding when compared with the use of C-P (OR, 0·97; 95% CI, 0·75-1·27; P=0·84).
Although the transfusion of I-P was associated with lower CCI-24 h when compared with the transfusion of C-P, this was not associated with differences in the OR of bleeding between I-P and C-P.
关于使用氨甲喋呤和长波紫外线致活的血小板的治疗效果存在相互矛盾的数据。我们进行了一项荟萃分析以总结不同随机对照试验(RCT)的结果。
截至 2011 年 3 月报道的 5 项 RCT 符合荟萃分析的标准。在不同的研究中计算了校正血小板计数增加(CCI)1 小时、24 小时和输注间隔(天)的加权均数差值(WMD)和致活血小板(I-P)组与未致活血小板(C-P)组出血的汇总比值比(OR)。
当我们分析 24 小时 CCI 时,随机对照试验具有统计学同质性,与输注 C-P 相比,输注 I-P 与较高的 24 小时 CCI 相关(WMD,3×10(3);95%CI,2·32×10(3)-3·69×10(3);P<0·00001)。当我们分析 1 小时 CCI、输注间隔和出血的 OR 时,RCT 具有统计学异质性。关于 I-P 和 C-P 组出血的 OR,在试验中变化可达 4 倍,范围从 0·66 到 2·66。当我们合并双盲和高方法学质量评分 RCT 时,与输注 C-P 相比,输注 I-P 与出血的 OR 增加无统计学相关性(OR,0·97;95%CI,0·75-1·27;P=0·84)。
尽管与输注 C-P 相比,输注 I-P 与较低的 24 小时 CCI 相关,但这与 I-P 和 C-P 之间出血的 OR 无差异相关。