Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C., USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):948-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1065.
Proposals to move toward reducing geographic differentials in health care spending have focused on patterns of spending in Medicare. We show in this article that when considering each state as a whole, there is almost no relationship between the level of spending for Medicare beneficiaries and that for other populations. In sharp contrast to these state-level results, there is a strong relationship between Medicare and Medicaid spending in comparing Hospital Referral Regions within each state. We suggest that the strong intrastate regional correlations demonstrate the importance of the supply of hospital beds, specialists, and other health care resources as determinants of use and spending. In contrast, the lack of correlation at the state level suggests that other factors, such as state-level poverty rates, influence use and spending at the state level, and that these other factors influence Medicare and non-Medicare use and spending differently. These findings demonstrate that it is important to broaden our analytic focus from Medicare beneficiaries to the larger population, and to consider the likely effects of changes in Medicare payment policy on the care received by other state residents.
关于减少医疗保健支出地区差异的提议主要集中在医疗保险的支出模式上。我们在本文中表明,当考虑整个州时,医疗保险受益人和其他人群的支出水平之间几乎没有关系。与这些州级结果形成鲜明对比的是,在比较每个州内的医院转诊区域时,医疗保险和医疗补助支出之间存在很强的关系。我们认为,医院床位、专家和其他医疗资源供应作为使用和支出的决定因素,强烈的州内区域相关性表明了这一点。相比之下,州级水平缺乏相关性表明,其他因素,如州级贫困率,会影响州级的使用和支出,而且这些其他因素会以不同的方式影响医疗保险和非医疗保险的使用和支出。这些发现表明,从医疗保险受益人扩大分析重点到更大的人群,并考虑医疗保险支付政策变化对其他州居民所接受的护理的可能影响是很重要的。