• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生服务研究在提供高价值康复护理中的作用。

Role of Health Services Research in Producing High-Value Rehabilitation Care.

作者信息

Rundell Sean D, Goode Adam P, Friedly Janna L, Jarvik Jeffrey G, Sullivan Sean D, Bresnahan Brian W

机构信息

S.D. Rundell, PT, DPT, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Box 359455, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105 (USA), and Comparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington.

A.P. Goode, PT, DPT, PhD, Doctor of Physical Therapy Division, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2015 Dec;95(12):1703-11. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150033. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

DOI:10.2522/ptj.20150033
PMID:26316531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4667153/
Abstract

The concept of value is receiving greater attention in rehabilitation and the broader health care environment. The overall purpose of this article is to present a framework to help clinicians, researchers, educators, and policy makers better understand the role of health services research in developing and evaluating evidence on value in rehabilitation. Value in health care is a multidimensional concept and may be defined differently by various stakeholders, but assessing value typically involves considering a combination of several health and economic outcomes. However, health care stakeholders often lack sufficient information on these outcomes to make well-informed decisions. Health services approaches such as comparative effectiveness research, patient-centered outcomes research, and health economics assessments are some ways to evaluate value. The evidence generated from such studies directly informs decision making and health policy. Rehabilitation professionals have a great opportunity to increase their engagement in describing, evaluating, delivering, and disseminating high-value care, but there are several barriers they need to consider to be most successful. Embracing health services research best practices is essential for advancing appropriate rehabilitation practice, research, and policy and for addressing challenges to implementing high-value care.

摘要

价值概念在康复领域以及更广泛的医疗环境中受到越来越多的关注。本文的总体目的是提出一个框架,以帮助临床医生、研究人员、教育工作者和政策制定者更好地理解卫生服务研究在制定和评估康复价值证据方面的作用。医疗保健中的价值是一个多维度概念,不同利益相关者可能有不同的定义,但评估价值通常需要综合考虑多个健康和经济结果。然而,医疗保健利益相关者往往缺乏关于这些结果的足够信息,难以做出明智的决策。比较效果研究、以患者为中心的结果研究和卫生经济学评估等卫生服务方法是评估价值的一些途径。此类研究产生的证据直接为决策和卫生政策提供依据。康复专业人员有很大的机会更多地参与描述、评估、提供和传播高价值护理,但要取得最大成功,他们需要考虑几个障碍。采用卫生服务研究的最佳实践对于推进适当的康复实践、研究和政策以及应对实施高价值护理的挑战至关重要。

相似文献

1
Role of Health Services Research in Producing High-Value Rehabilitation Care.卫生服务研究在提供高价值康复护理中的作用。
Phys Ther. 2015 Dec;95(12):1703-11. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150033. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
2
The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.比较疗效研究对介入性疼痛管理的影响:从医疗保险现代化法案到患者保护与平价医疗法案以及患者为中心的医疗成果研究所的演变。
Pain Physician. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):E249-82.
3
Patient-centered care. Designing and delivering quality rehab services means placing patient needs over those of providers.以患者为中心的护理。设计并提供高质量的康复服务意味着将患者需求置于提供者需求之上。
Rehab Manag. 1994 Apr-May;7(3):25-6, 29-30, 119.
4
The patient-centered outcomes research institute: research done differently.以患者为中心的结果研究机构:与众不同的研究。
Nurs Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;64(1):72-7. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000070.
5
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: the intersection of science and health care.患者为中心的结局研究学会:科学与医疗保健的交汇点。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Jun 23;2(37):37cm18. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001235.
6
Patient Centeredness and Engagement in Quality-of-Care Oncology Research.以患者为中心及参与肿瘤护理质量研究
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):176-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003749. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
7
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.评估为儿童提供的医疗保健质量。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1059-90.
8
Stakeholder Engagement in a Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measure Implementation: A Report from the SAFTINet Practice-based Research Network (PBRN).利益相关者参与患者报告结局(PRO)指标的实施:来自SAFTINet基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的报告。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):102-15. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150141.
9
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
10
The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.ISPOR 成本效益研究质量改进良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Previous Experience on Virtual Reality Adoption in Medical Rehabilitation and Overcoming Knowledge Gaps Among Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study.既往经验对医学康复中虚拟现实应用的影响及弥合医疗保健专业人员知识差距的研究:定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e62649. doi: 10.2196/62649.
2
Understanding the value of rehabilitation: Perspectives from South African Stakeholders.理解康复的价值:南非利益相关者的观点
Afr J Disabil. 2024 Jul 19;13:1406. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1406. eCollection 2024.
3
"It's like a lifeboat": stakeholder perspectives of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program (ICAP)".“这就像一艘救生艇”:强化综合失语症项目(ICAP)的利益相关者观点
Aphasiology. 2021;36(3). doi: 10.1080/02687038.2021.1873905.
4
The Integration of Physical Therapists and Occupational Therapists into Burn Wound Care Increases Therapist Productivity, Job Satisfaction, and Multidisciplinary Collaboration.将物理治疗师和职业治疗师纳入烧伤伤口护理可提高治疗师的工作效率、工作满意度以及多学科协作水平。
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Aug 6;45(4):814-821. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae041.
5
The Value of Health Economics and Outcomes Research in Prosthetics and Orthotics.健康经济学与结果研究在假肢与矫形器领域的价值
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2021 Sep 21;4(2):35959. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.35959. eCollection 2021.
6
What does high value care for musculoskeletal conditions mean and how do you apply it in practice? A consensus statement from a research network of physiotherapists in New South Wales, Australia.高价值的肌肉骨骼疾病护理意味着什么,以及如何在实践中应用?来自澳大利亚新南威尔士州物理治疗师研究网络的共识声明。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 16;13(6):e071489. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071489.
7
A Health Care Value Framework for Physical Therapy Primary Health Care Organizations.物理治疗初级保健组织的医疗保健价值框架。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2021;30(1):27-35. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000289.
8
The Role of Earlier Receipt of a Lower Limb Prosthesis on Emergency Department Utilization.下肢假肢早期获得对急诊部门利用的影响。
PM R. 2021 Aug;13(8):819-826. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12504. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
9
Achieving Participation-Focused Intervention Through Shared Decision Making: Proposal of an Age- and Disorder-Generic Framework.通过共享决策实现以参与为重点的干预:提出一个年龄和疾病通用框架。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Aug 4;29(3):1335-1360. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00043. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
Development of the Rehabilitation Health Policy, Systems, and Services Research field: Quantitative Analyses of Publications over Time (1990-2017) and across Country Type.康复卫生政策、系统和服务研究领域的发展:随时间(1990-2017 年)和国家类型的出版物定量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;17(3):965. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030965.

本文引用的文献

1
Designing smarter pay-for-performance programs.设计更智能的绩效薪酬方案。
JAMA. 2014;312(24):2617-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15398.
2
The American Physical Therapy Association's top five choosing wisely recommendations.美国物理治疗协会的五项明智选择建议。
Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;95(1):9-24. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140287. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
3
The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research.患者为中心的结果研究的PCORI视角。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 15;312(15):1513-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11100.
4
Adoption and use of electronic health records among federally qualified health centers grew substantially during 2010-12.2010年至2012年期间,联邦合格医疗中心对电子健康记录的采用和使用大幅增加。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1254-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1274.
5
Creating value in health care through big data: opportunities and policy implications.通过大数据在医疗保健领域创造价值:机遇与政策启示
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1115-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0147.
6
Patient-powered research networks: building capacity for conducting patient-centered clinical outcomes research.患者主导的研究网络:为开展以患者为中心的临床结局研究构建能力。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):583-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002758. Epub 2014 May 12.
7
Why disability and rehabilitation specialists should lead the way in patient-reported outcomes.为什么残疾与康复专家应在患者报告结局方面发挥引领作用。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;95(8):1419-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
8
Measuring patient satisfaction with health care treatment using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction measure delivered superior and robust satisfaction estimates.使用简短患者满意度评估量表来衡量患者对医疗护理的满意度,可以得到更高质量和更稳健的满意度评估结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):527-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.010.
9
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 25;346:f1049. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1049.
10
Redesigning primary care: a strategic vision to improve value by organizing around patients' needs.重新设计初级保健:通过围绕患者需求组织来提高价值的战略愿景。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):516-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0961.