• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桡骨头骨折早期活动方案的比较。

Comparison of early mobilization protocols in radial head fractures.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Mar;27(3):134-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31825cf765.

DOI:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31825cf765
PMID:22576643
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared 2 different protocols of early mobilization with a protocol of delayed mobilization in patients with simple radial head fractures (B2.1 type of Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification). An attempt to correlate certain characteristics of the radial head fractures with outcome was made.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized comparative study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty consecutive patients were randomly allocated into 3 different protocols.

INTERVENTION

In the first group, immediate mobilization of the elbow joint was applied. In the second, a sling was used for 2 days and then active mobilization was introduced. The third protocol represented the control group where immobilization in a cast for 7 days before the mobilization was applied.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Broberg and Morrey score, The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow score, visual analogue scale, and grip and pinch strength were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 2 protocols introducing early mobilization resulted in better outcome compared with immobilization. The first protocol resulted in worse pain in the first 3 days. Range of motion, strength, and functional outcome was better in patients allocated to the second protocol. These differences were more evident in displaced fractures. A fragment displacement of more than 4 mm and an angulation of more than 30 degrees proved to impair outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Early mobilization of simple radial head fractures seemed to be a safe and an effective treatment option. It seems that a delay of 48 hours before early mobilization could be advantageous. Individualization of treatment in accordance to the characteristics of fracture could be a decisive factor for outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

我们比较了两种不同的早期活动方案与延迟活动方案对桡骨头简单骨折(OTA 分类 2.1 型)患者的效果。尝试将桡骨头骨折的某些特征与结果相关联。

设计

前瞻性随机对照研究。

设置

1 级创伤中心。

患者/参与者:180 例连续患者被随机分配到 3 个不同的方案中。

干预

第 1 组立即活动肘关节。第 2 组使用吊带 2 天,然后开始主动活动。第 3 组为对照组,在应用活动前先将骨折固定在石膏中 7 天。

主要观察指标

Broberg 和 Morrey 评分、美国肩肘外科医师-肘评分、视觉模拟评分、握力和捏力。

结果

两种早期活动方案的结果优于固定组。第 1 组在前 3 天疼痛更严重。接受第 2 组方案的患者活动范围、力量和功能结果更好。这些差异在移位骨折中更为明显。骨折块移位超过 4 毫米和角度大于 30 度会影响结果。

结论

早期活动桡骨头简单骨折似乎是一种安全有效的治疗选择。似乎在早期活动前延迟 48 小时可能会有优势。根据骨折的特点进行个体化治疗可能是结果的决定性因素。

证据水平

治疗水平 I。请参阅作者说明以获取完整的证据水平描述。

相似文献

1
Comparison of early mobilization protocols in radial head fractures.桡骨头骨折早期活动方案的比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Mar;27(3):134-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31825cf765.
2
Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?肘部三联征损伤:是否需要固定喙突?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2084-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3471-7.
3
Radial head replacement for acute complex fractures: what are the rate and risks factors for revision or removal?桡骨头置换治疗急性复杂骨折:翻修或取出的发生率和风险因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2136-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3516-y.
4
Immediate mobilization of distal radius fractures stabilized by volar locking plate results in a better short-term outcome than a five week immobilization: A prospective randomized trial.掌侧锁定钢板固定的桡骨远端骨折即刻活动的短期疗效优于 5 周固定:前瞻性随机试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2022 Jan;36(1):69-86. doi: 10.1177/02692155211036674. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
5
Is ORIF superior to nonoperative treatment in isolated displaced partial articular fractures of the radial head?桡骨头孤立性移位部分关节内骨折的切开复位内固定是否优于非手术治疗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2105-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3541-x.
6
Open reduction and internal fixation of radial head fractures: do outcomes differ between simple and complex injuries?桡骨头骨折切开复位内固定术:单纯损伤与复杂损伤的结果是否不同?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2120-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3519-8.
7
Management of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a titanium prosthesis, ligament repair, and early mobilization. Surgical technique.采用钛假体、韧带修复及早期活动治疗梅森III型桡骨头骨折。手术技术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):136-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02710.
8
Comminuted fractures of the radial head: comparison of resection and internal fixation. Surgical technique.桡骨头粉碎性骨折:切除术与内固定术的比较。手术技术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:11-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00841.
9
Fixation versus replacement of radial head in terrible triad: is there a difference in elbow stability and prognosis?桡骨头固定与置换治疗三联征:肘关节稳定性和预后是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2128-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3331-x.
10
Fracture of the radial head with associated elbow dislocation: results of treatment using a floating radial head prosthesis.桡骨头骨折伴肘关节脱位:使用浮动桡骨头假体的治疗结果
J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Mar-Apr;14(3):171-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200003000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Which radial head fractures are best treated surgically?哪些桡骨头骨折采用手术治疗效果最佳?
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 May 10;9(5):413-421. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0035.
2
Bilateral Radial Head Fracture Secondary to Weighted Push-Up Exercise: Case Report and Review of Literature of a Rare Injury.因负重俯卧撑运动继发双侧桡骨头骨折:病例报告及罕见损伤文献综述
Indian J Orthop. 2021 May 23;56(1):162-167. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00427-0. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Early Active Rehabilitation Treatment for a Patient with a Stable Type of Fifth Metatarsal Base Fracture: a Case Report.
第五跖骨基底稳定型骨折患者的早期积极康复治疗:一例报告
J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2021 Sep 10;4:1000068. doi: 10.2340/20030711-1000068. eCollection 2021.
4
Radial Head Fractures.桡骨头骨折
Open Orthop J. 2017 Nov 30;11:1405-1416. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011405. eCollection 2017.
5
Current concepts in the management of radial head fractures.桡骨头骨折治疗的当前概念
World J Orthop. 2015 Dec 18;6(11):954-60. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.954.
6
Aspiration of the elbow joint for treating radial head fractures.肘关节穿刺抽吸术治疗桡骨头骨折。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 22;2014(11):CD009949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009949.pub2.
7
Management of Mason type 1 radial head fractures: a regional survey and a review of literature.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Oct;24(7):1133-7. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1386-8. Epub 2013 Dec 11.