Best Evidence Medical Education, Tay Park House, 484 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1LR, United Kingdom.
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):435-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.682185.
This commentary accompanies the publication of several Best Evidence Medical Education systematic reviews together with invited discussion papers on issues of key importance to evidence shaped health professional education. The reviews and papers signify positive developments for the still very young movement where practitioners and policy makers use evidence to help their decision making in health professional education. They provide this commentary with exemplar material to highlight some key points about the process of education systematic review and some of the conceptual and methodological issues presently being discussed by colleagues interested in taking the evidence shaped education movement in a forward direction. These include the need for more funded reviews, greater commitment to question-driven research (primary and secondary) and further debate about power, evidence and change. It is hoped that this will lead to a broader debate, a widening of interest and a deepening of scholarship related to evidence shared health professional education.
本评论是伴随几项最佳证据医学教育系统评价的发表而撰写的,同时还邀请了一些讨论论文,探讨对证据影响健康专业教育的关键问题。这些评论和论文标志着一个仍处于早期阶段的运动的积极发展,从业者和政策制定者利用证据来帮助他们在健康专业教育方面的决策。它们为本文提供了典范材料,突出了教育系统评价过程中的一些关键点,以及对那些有兴趣推动循证教育运动向前发展的同事们目前正在讨论的一些概念和方法问题。其中包括需要更多有资金支持的评价、更加致力于问题驱动的研究(主要和次要)以及对权力、证据和变革的进一步辩论。希望这将引发更广泛的辩论,扩大兴趣,并深化与循证共享健康专业教育相关的学术研究。