Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Sep;23(9):971-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02349.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
Spectral Profiles of CFAE.
Spectral analysis of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may be useful for gaining insight into mechanisms underlying paroxysmal and longstanding atrial fibrillation (AF). The commonly used dominant frequency (DF) measurement has limitations.
CFAE recordings were acquired from outside the 4 pulmonary vein ostia and at 2 left atrial free wall sites in 10 paroxysmal and 10 persistent AF patients. Two consecutive 8s-series were analyzed from recordings >16s in duration. Power spectra were computed for each 8s-series in the range 3-12 Hz and normalized. The mean and standard deviation of normalized power spectra (MPS and SPS, respectively) were compared for paroxysmal versus persistent CFAE. Also, the DF and its peak amplitude (ADF) were compared for pulmonary vein sites only. Power spectra were computed using ensemble average and Fourier methods.
No significant changes occurred in any parameter from the first to second recording sequence. For both sequences, MPS and SPS were significantly greater, and DF and ADF were significantly less, in paroxysmals versus persistents. The MPS and ADF measurements from ensemble spectra produced the most significant differences in paroxysmals versus persistents (P < 0.0001). DF differences were less significant, which can be attributed to the relatively high variability of DF in paroxysmals. The MPS was correlated to the duration of uninterrupted persistent AF prior to electrophysiologic study (P = 0.01), and to left atrial volume for all AF (P < 0.05).
The MPS and ADF measurements introduced in this study are probably superior to DF for discerning power spectral differences in paroxysmal versus longstanding CFAE. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 971-979, September 2012).
CFAE 的光谱特征。
对复杂碎裂心房电图(CFAE)的频谱分析可能有助于深入了解阵发性和持续性心房颤动(AF)的潜在机制。常用的主导频率(DF)测量存在局限性。
从 10 例阵发性和 10 例持续性 AF 患者的 4 个肺静脉口外和左心房游离壁 2 个部位采集 CFAE 记录。对持续时间>16s 的记录进行了两次连续的 8s 系列分析。为每个 8s 系列计算了 3-12Hz 范围内的功率谱,并进行了归一化。比较了阵发性与持续性 CFAE 的归一化功率谱均值(MPS)和标准差(SPS)。仅比较了肺静脉部位的 DF 及其峰振幅(ADF)。使用集合平均和傅立叶方法计算功率谱。
从第一个到第二个记录序列,没有任何参数发生显著变化。对于两个序列,MPS 和 SPS 在阵发性中均显著大于,而 DF 和 ADF 在阵发性中均显著小于。从集合谱得出的 MPS 和 ADF 测量结果在阵发性与持续性之间差异最显著(P<0.0001)。DF 差异较小,这归因于阵发性中 DF 的相对高变异性。MPS 与电生理研究前持续性 AF 的持续时间相关(P=0.01),与所有 AF 的左心房容积相关(P<0.05)。
本研究中引入的 MPS 和 ADF 测量值可能优于 DF,可用于辨别阵发性与持续性 CFAE 之间的功率谱差异。(J 心血管电生理学,第 23 卷,第 971-979 页,2012 年 9 月)。