Biviano Angelo B, Ciaccio Edward J, Knotts Robert, Fleitman Jessica, Lawrence John, Iyer Vivek, Whang William, Garan Hasan
Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1448-55. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.044. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
There are scant data comparing the electrogram (EGM) signal characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) at baseline vs electrically induced states during ablation procedures.
The purpose of this study was to use novel intracardiac signal analysis techniques to gain insights into the effects of catheter ablation and AF reinduction on AF EGMs in patients with persistent AF.
We collected left atrial EGMs in patients undergoing first ablation for persistent AF at 3 time intervals: (1) AF at baseline; (2) AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI); and (3) AF after post-PVI cardioversion and subsequent reinduction. We analyzed 2 EGM spectral characteristics: (1) dominant frequency and (2) spectral complexity; and 2 EGM morphologic characteristics: (1) morphology variation and (2) pattern repetitiveness.
There were no differences in AF dominant frequency, dominant amplitude, spectral complexity, or metrics of EGM morphology or repetitiveness at baseline vs after PVI. However, dominant frequency, dominant amplitude, and spectral complexity differed significantly after direct current cardioversion and reinduction of AF.
The frequency, spectral complexity, and local EGM morphologies of AF do not significantly change over the course of a PVI procedure in patients with persistent AF. However, reinduction of AF after direct current cardioversion results in different dominant frequency and spectral complexity, consistent with a change in the characteristics of the perpetuating source(s) of the newly induced AF. These data suggest that AF properties can vary significantly between baseline and reinduced AF, with potential clinical ramifications for outcomes of catheter ablation procedures.
关于在消融手术过程中,心房颤动(AF)的基线状态与电诱导状态下的心电图(EGM)信号特征进行比较的数据很少。
本研究的目的是使用新颖的心内信号分析技术,以深入了解导管消融和房颤再诱发对持续性房颤患者房颤EGM的影响。
我们在3个时间间隔收集了接受首次持续性房颤消融患者的左心房EGM:(1)基线时的房颤;(2)肺静脉隔离(PVI)后的房颤;(3)PVI后复律及随后再诱发后的房颤。我们分析了2种EGM频谱特征:(1)主导频率和(2)频谱复杂性;以及2种EGM形态特征:(1)形态变化和(2)模式重复性。
基线时与PVI后相比,房颤主导频率、主导幅度、频谱复杂性或EGM形态或重复性指标无差异。然而,直流电复律和房颤再诱发后,主导频率、主导幅度和频谱复杂性有显著差异。
在持续性房颤患者的PVI手术过程中,房颤的频率、频谱复杂性和局部EGM形态没有显著变化。然而,直流电复律后房颤再诱发会导致不同的主导频率和频谱复杂性,这与新诱发房颤的持续源特征变化一致。这些数据表明,房颤特性在基线和再诱发房颤之间可能有显著差异,对导管消融手术的结果有潜在的临床影响。