Bolduc Jean-Sébastien
Université Panthéon-Sorbonne Paris 1, Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, France.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2012 Sep;43(3):674-83. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 May 9.
Since Krebs and Davies's (1978) landmark publication, it is acknowledged that behavioural ecology owes much to the ethological tradition in the study of animal behaviour. Although this assumption seems to be right-many of the first behavioural ecologists were trained in departments where ethology developed and matured-it still to be properly assessed. In this paper, I undertake to identify the approaches used by ethologists that contributed to behavioural ecology's constitution as a field of inquiry. It is my contention that the current practices in behavioural biology owe ethology something much subtler than the simple transposition of Tinbergen's Four Problems for heuristic purposes. Demonstrating what ethology inherited from the long naturalist tradition shows the tensions that strained the field and that later led to the loss of both its unity and its specificity. It also allows for a precise delineating of what behavioural ecology picked up from the ethological practice, and it helps to cast some light on the introduction of economical thinking in behavioural sciences.
自克雷布斯和戴维斯1978年具有里程碑意义的著作出版以来,人们公认行为生态学在很大程度上得益于动物行为研究中的行为学传统。尽管这一假设似乎是正确的——许多早期的行为生态学家是在行为学得以发展和成熟的系里接受培训的——但仍有待进行恰当的评估。在本文中,我试图确定行为学家所采用的、促成行为生态学成为一个研究领域的方法。我的观点是,行为生物学目前的做法从行为学那里继承的东西,远比为启发式目的简单套用廷伯根的四个问题要微妙得多。展示行为学从悠久的博物学传统中继承了什么,揭示了使该领域紧张的矛盾,这些矛盾后来导致了它的统一性和独特性的丧失。这也使得我们能够精确地勾勒出行为生态学从行为学实践中借鉴了什么,并且有助于阐明经济学思维在行为科学中的引入。