• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症和妄想中证据整合的模式。

Patterns of evidence integration in schizophrenia and delusion.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Scientific Institute and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Via Stamira d'Ancona 20, 20127 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.005
PMID:22578403
Abstract

Previous studies documented a bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) in patients affected by schizophrenia spectrum disorders, with some discrepant findings on its relationship with delusions. In order to further investigate the patterns of evidence integration in schizophrenia and delusion, we recruited 40 deluded and non-deluded patients with schizophrenia and 40 healthy control subjects. Participants were administered the BADE test, which consisted of 30 delusion-neutral scenarios, each one progressively described by three subsequent disambiguating statements and providing four types of interpretation to rate for plausibility; at every additional evidence presentation, participants were asked to adjust their ratings. In contrast to previous works, patients displayed both a BADE and a bias against confirmatory evidence (BACE) relative to healthy subjects, as they reduced plausibility ratings on incorrect interpretations and increased plausibility ratings on correct interpretation significantly less over trial progress. Moreover, BACE and BADE measures showed to discriminate differentially control from schizophrenia participants and delusional from non-delusional patients.

摘要

先前的研究记录了精神分裂症谱系障碍患者对否定证据的偏见(BADE),并且对其与妄想之间的关系存在一些不一致的发现。为了进一步研究精神分裂症和妄想中的证据整合模式,我们招募了 40 名患有精神分裂症的妄想症患者和 40 名健康对照组。参与者接受了 BADE 测试,该测试由 30 个妄想中立的场景组成,每个场景都由随后的三个澄清语句逐步描述,并提供四种解释类型来评估可能性;在每次提供额外的证据时,参与者都被要求调整他们的评分。与以前的工作不同,患者相对于健康受试者表现出了 BADE 和对确认性证据的偏见(BACE),因为他们在错误解释上降低了可能性评分,而在正确解释上的可能性评分增加明显较少。此外,BACE 和 BADE 测量值可区分对照组和精神分裂症组,以及妄想组和非妄想组。

相似文献

1
Patterns of evidence integration in schizophrenia and delusion.精神分裂症和妄想中证据整合的模式。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 May 10.
2
A generalized bias against disconfirmatory evidence in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中对反证的普遍偏见。
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Jun 15;142(2-3):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.08.016. Epub 2006 May 2.
3
The contribution of a cognitive bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) to delusions in schizophrenia.认知偏差对不支持性证据的抵触(BADE)在精神分裂症妄想形成中的作用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 May;28(4):605-17. doi: 10.1080/13803390590949511.
4
Incorrigibility, jumping to conclusions, and decision threshold in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的顽固性、草率下结论及决策阈值
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2011 Mar;16(2):174-92. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2010.536084. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
5
Neurocognitive capabilities modulate the integration of evidence in schizophrenia.神经认知能力调节精神分裂症中证据的整合。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Sep 30;219(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.056. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
Impaired integration of disambiguating evidence in delusional schizophrenia patients.妄想型精神分裂症患者消除歧义证据整合受损。
Psychol Med. 2014 Oct;44(13):2729-38. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000397. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
7
A bias against disconfirmatory evidence is associated with delusion proneness in a nonclinical sample.在非临床样本中,对反证的偏见与妄想倾向有关。
Schizophr Bull. 2007 Jul;33(4):1023-8. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm013. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
8
Belief inflexibility in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的信念僵化。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2008 May;13(3):267-77. doi: 10.1080/13546800802099033.
9
Association of the Jumping to Conclusions and Evidence Integration Biases With Delusions in Psychosis: A Detailed Meta-analysis.精神分裂症中妄下结论和证据整合偏差与妄想的关联:一项详细的荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Mar 1;43(2):344-354. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw056.
10
[Validation of the bias against disconfirmatory evidence in a French-speaking sample of schizophrenic patients].[对说法语的精神分裂症患者样本中对反证的偏见的验证]
Encephale. 2019 Apr;45(2):147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish versions of the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale (DACOBS) and Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (CBQp).达沃斯认知偏差量表(DACOBS)和精神病认知偏差问卷(CBQp)土耳其语版本的信度和效度
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2024 Nov 19;61(4):324-331. doi: 10.29399/npa.28751. eCollection 2024.
2
Resistance to Extinction of Evaluative Fear Conditioning in Delusion Proneness.妄想倾向中评价性恐惧条件反射的消退抵抗
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Jun 5;3(1):sgac033. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac033. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Resolving the Delusion Paradox.
消解妄想悖论。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Nov 29;49(6):1425-1436. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad084.
4
Belief Inflexibility and Cognitive Biases in Anorexia Nervosa-The Role of the Bias against Disconfirmatory Evidence and Its Clinical and Neuropsychological Correlates.神经性厌食症中的信念僵化与认知偏差——反对反证证据的偏差作用及其临床和神经心理学关联
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 22;12(5):1746. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051746.
5
COVID-19 conspiracy ideation is associated with the delusion proneness trait and resistance to update of beliefs.新冠病毒阴谋论观念与妄想倾向特质和抗拒信仰更新有关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 20;12(1):10352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14071-7.
6
Inflexibility in Reasoning: Comparisons of Cognitive Flexibility, Explanatory Flexibility, and Belief Flexibility Between Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder.推理中的僵化:精神分裂症与重度抑郁症之间认知灵活性、解释灵活性和信念灵活性的比较
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 18;11:609569. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.609569. eCollection 2020.
7
Dual-process theory, conflict processing, and delusional belief.双加工理论、冲突加工与妄想信念。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;72:101748. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101748. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
8
Fast and slow thinking in distressing delusions: A review of the literature and implications for targeted therapy.痛苦妄想中的快思考和慢思考:文献综述及对靶向治疗的启示。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.045. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Association of the Jumping to Conclusions and Evidence Integration Biases With Delusions in Psychosis: A Detailed Meta-analysis.精神分裂症中妄下结论和证据整合偏差与妄想的关联:一项详细的荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Mar 1;43(2):344-354. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw056.
10
Metacognitive training for schizophrenia: a systematic review.精神分裂症的元认知训练:一项系统综述
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 25;27(3):149-57. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215065.