Departement für Chemie und Biochemie, Universität Bern, Freiestrasse 3, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
J Chem Phys. 2012 May 7;136(17):174308. doi: 10.1063/1.4705119.
The S(1)/S(2) state exciton splittings of symmetric doubly hydrogen-bonded gas-phase dimers provide spectroscopic benchmarks for the excited-state electronic couplings between UV chromophores. These have important implications for electronic energy transfer in multichromophoric systems ranging from photosynthetic light-harvesting antennae to photosynthetic reaction centers, conjugated polymers, molecular crystals, and nucleic acids. We provide laser spectroscopic data on the S(1)/S(2) excitonic splitting Δ(exp) of the doubly H-bonded o-cyanophenol (oCP) dimer and compare to the splittings of the dimers of (2-aminopyridine)(2), [(2AP)(2)], (2-pyridone)(2), [(2PY)(2)], (benzoic acid)(2), [(BZA)(2)], and (benzonitrile)(2), [(BN)(2)]. The experimental S(1)/S(2) excitonic splittings are Δ(exp) = 16.4 cm(-1) for (oCP)(2), 11.5 cm(-1) for (2AP)(2), 43.5 cm(-1) for (2PY)(2), and <1 cm(-1) for (BZA)(2). In contrast, the vertical S(1)/S(2) energy gaps Δ(calc) calculated by the approximate second-order coupled cluster (CC2) method for the same dimers are 10-40 times larger than the Δ(exp) values. The qualitative failure of this and other ab initio methods to reproduce the exciton splitting Δ(exp) arises from the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) approximation, which implicitly assumes the strong-coupling case and cannot be employed to evaluate excitonic splittings of systems that are in the weak-coupling limit. Given typical H-bond distances and oscillator strengths, the majority of H-bonded dimers lie in the weak-coupling limit. In this case, the monomer electronic-vibrational coupling upon electronic excitation must be accounted for; the excitonic splittings arise between the vibronic (and not the electronic) transitions. The discrepancy between the BO-based splittings Δ(calc) and the much smaller experimental Δ(exp) values is resolved by taking into account the quenching of the BO splitting by the intramolecular vibronic coupling in the monomer S(1) ← S(0) excitation. The vibrational quenching factors Γ for the five dimers (oCP)(2), (2AP)(2), (2AP)(2), (BN)(2), and (BZA)(2) lie in the range Γ = 0.03-0.2. The quenched excitonic splittings Γ[middle dot]Δ(calc) are found to be in very good agreement with the observed splittings Δ(exp). The vibrational quenching approach predicts reliable Δ(exp) values for the investigated dimers, confirms the importance of vibrational quenching of the electronic Davydov splittings, and provides a sound basis for predicting realistic exciton splittings in multichromophoric systems.
对称的双氢键气相二聚体的 S(1)/S(2) 态激子分裂为 UV 发色团之间的激发态电子耦合提供了光谱基准。这对于从光合光捕获天线到光合反应中心、共轭聚合物、分子晶体和核酸的多色团系统中的电子能量转移具有重要意义。我们提供了关于双氢键邻氰基苯酚 (oCP) 二聚体的 S(1)/S(2) 激子分裂 Δ(exp) 的激光光谱数据,并将其与 (2-氨基吡啶)(2)、[(2AP)(2)]、(2-吡啶酮)(2)、[(2PY)(2)]、(苯甲酸)(2)、[(BZA)(2)] 和 (苯甲腈)(2)、[(BN)(2)] 二聚体的分裂进行了比较。实验 S(1)/S(2) 激子分裂 Δ(exp) 为 oCP(2) 为 16.4 cm(-1),(2AP)(2) 为 11.5 cm(-1),(2PY)(2) 为 43.5 cm(-1),(BZA)(2) 为 <1 cm(-1)。相比之下,相同二聚体的近似二阶耦合簇 (CC2) 方法计算的垂直 S(1)/S(2) 能量间隙 Δ(calc) 比 Δ(exp) 值大 10-40 倍。这种方法和其他从头算方法在复制激子分裂 Δ(exp) 方面的定性失败源于 Born-Oppenheimer (BO) 近似,该近似隐含地假设强耦合情况,并且不能用于评估处于弱耦合极限的系统的激子分裂。给定典型的氢键距离和振子强度,大多数氢键二聚体处于弱耦合极限。在这种情况下,必须考虑电子激发后单体的电子-振动耦合;激子分裂出现在振动态(而不是电子态)跃迁之间。BO 基分裂 Δ(calc) 与实验上小得多的 Δ(exp) 值之间的差异通过考虑单体 S(1) ← S(0) 激发中分子内振子耦合对 BO 分裂的猝灭来解决。五个二聚体 (oCP)(2)、(2AP)(2)、(2AP)(2)、(BN)(2) 和 (BZA)(2) 的振动猝灭因子 Γ 介于 Γ = 0.03-0.2 之间。发现被猝灭的激子分裂 Γ[中.dot]Δ(calc)与观察到的分裂 Δ(exp) 非常吻合。振动猝灭方法为研究的二聚体提供了可靠的 Δ(exp) 值,证实了电子 Davydov 分裂的振动猝灭的重要性,并为预测多色团系统中的实际激子分裂提供了合理的基础。