• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的护理和助产士委员会导师培训课程的有效性。

Effectiveness of the new NMC mentor preparation course.

作者信息

Veeramah Ven

机构信息

School of Health and Social Care, University of Greenwich, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2012;21(7):413-6, 418. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.7.413.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.2012.21.7.413
PMID:22585019
Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether the mentor preparation course introduced in 2006 by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) and based on NMC mentor standards is meeting the needs of mentors to support preregistration students in practice. A cross-sectional survey was carried out, involving 346 mentors who successfully completed the new course. A self-administered postal questionnaire was used to collect data between December 2010 and February 2011, with a response rate of 57.5%. Overall, respondents felt adequately prepared for their role as mentors and were more confident in their ability to support preregistration students in practice. However, a significant number of respondents received little protected time away from clinical duties to complete the theoretical and practical components of the course and many indicated the need for more input on the practice assessment document used for assessing preregistration nursing and midwifery students.

摘要

本研究旨在确定护理与助产士理事会(NMC)于2006年推出的、基于NMC导师标准的导师培训课程是否满足导师在实践中支持预注册学生的需求。开展了一项横断面调查,涉及346名成功完成新课程的导师。在2010年12月至2011年2月期间,通过自填式邮寄问卷收集数据,回复率为57.5%。总体而言,受访者认为自己为担任导师的角色做好了充分准备,并且对自己在实践中支持预注册学生的能力更有信心。然而,相当多的受访者几乎没有从临床工作中抽出受保护的时间来完成课程的理论和实践部分,许多人表示需要在用于评估预注册护理和助产学生的实践评估文件方面获得更多投入。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of the new NMC mentor preparation course.新的护理和助产士委员会导师培训课程的有效性。
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(7):413-6, 418. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.7.413.
2
Assessment matters-mentors need support in their role.评估很重要——导师在其角色中需要支持。
Br J Nurs. 2014;23(9):454-8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.9.454.
3
An evaluation of nursing and midwifery sign off mentors, new mentors and nurse lecturers' understanding of the sign off mentor role.护理和助产学签署导师、新导师和护士讲师对签署导师角色的理解评估。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Jan;14(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 May 30.
4
Implementation and sustainability of the nursing and midwifery standards for mentoring in the UK.英国护理和助产士导师制标准的实施和可持续性。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2010 Sep;10(5):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2009.11.014. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
5
Implementing a sign off mentor preparation workshop--a tripartite approach.实施签字导师准备研讨会——三方方法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Apr;32(3):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
6
A mixed-methods study exploring sign-off mentorship practices in relation to the Nursing and Midwifery Council standards.一项混合方法研究,探讨与护理及助产士管理局标准相关的签署指导实践。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(19-20):3056-3066. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13652. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
7
Preparing registrants for mentor roles: the chicken or egg conundrum.让注册人员做好担任导师的准备:先有鸡还是先有蛋的难题。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2016 Dec 1;23(8):36-39. doi: 10.7748/nm.2016.e1524.
8
Supervision and assessment: the new Nursing and Midwifery Council standards.监督与评估:护理及助产士理事会新准则
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2018 Jul 27;25(3):17-21. doi: 10.7748/nm.2018.e1765. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
Mentorship practice and revalidation.导师指导实践与再认证
Nurs Stand. 2016 Jun 15;30(42):56-63. doi: 10.7748/ns.2016.e10395.
10
The implications of contact with the mentor for preregistration nursing and midwifery students.
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Jul;35(2):151-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01832.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing Evidence on Interventions to Strengthen the Clinical Support for Midwifery Students in Clinical Placements: Protocol for a Systematic Scoping Review.分析加强助产专业学生临床实习临床支持干预措施的证据:一项系统综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(9):e29707. doi: 10.2196/29707.