• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五项免疫测定项目中试剂批次间可比性测试的分析

Analysis of reagent lot-to-lot comparability tests in five immunoassay items.

作者信息

Kim Hyun Soo, Kang Hee Jung, Whang Dong Hee, Lee Seong Gyu, Park Min Jeong, Park Ji-Young, Lee Kyu Man

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, 150-719, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2012 Spring;42(2):165-73.

PMID:22585613
Abstract

We investigated the degree of lot-to-lot reagent variation for 5 common immunoassay items. We measured the commercial as well as in-house controls for α-fetoprotein (AFP), ferritin, CA19-9, quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) 10 times each by using both the old and the new lot of reagents whenever a reagent lot was changed, over a period of 10 months. The differences in the mean control values, the percent difference (% difference), and the difference to between-run standard deviation ratio (D:SD ratio) between successive lots were calculated. The % difference in mean control values between 2 reagent lots ranged from 0.1 to 17.5% for AFP, 1.0 to 18.6% for ferritin, 0.6 to 14.3% for CA19-9, 0.6 to 16.2% for HBsAg, and 0.1 to 17.7% for anti-HBs except negative controls of HBsAg and anti-HBs. The maximum D:SD ratios between 2 lots were 4.37 for AFP, 4.39 for ferritin, 2.43 for CA19-9, 1.64 for HBsAg, and 4.16 for anti-HBs. Thus, we have experienced extensive variability in lot-to-lot reagent variation for 5 immunoassay items, indicating that reagent lot-to-lot comparability tests should be continuously performed and that laboratories should determine their own acceptance criteria for each item.

摘要

我们调查了5种常见免疫测定项目的试剂批次间差异程度。在10个月的时间里,每当更换试剂批次时,我们使用新旧两个批次的试剂,对甲胎蛋白(AFP)、铁蛋白、CA19-9、定量乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)和乙肝表面抗体(抗-HBs)的商业对照品和自制对照品各进行了10次测量。计算了连续批次间平均对照值的差异、差异百分比(%差异)以及差异与批间标准差的比值(D:SD比值)。除HBsAg和抗-HBs的阴性对照外,2个试剂批次间平均对照值的%差异在AFP中为0.1%至17.5%,铁蛋白中为1.0%至18.6%,CA19-9中为0.6%至14.3%,HBsAg中为0.6%至16.2%,抗-HBs中为0.1%至17.7%。2个批次间的最大D:SD比值在AFP中为4.37,铁蛋白中为4.39,CA19-9中为2.43,HBsAg中为1.64,抗-HBs中为4.16。因此,我们发现5种免疫测定项目的试剂批次间差异很大,这表明应持续进行试剂批次间的可比性测试,并且实验室应针对每个项目确定自己的验收标准。

相似文献

1
Analysis of reagent lot-to-lot comparability tests in five immunoassay items.五项免疫测定项目中试剂批次间可比性测试的分析
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2012 Spring;42(2):165-73.
2
[Selecting methods of controls concentration for internal quality control and continuity of control chart between different reagent lots for HBsAg qualitative detection].[乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)定性检测室内质量控制中对照品浓度选择方法及不同试剂批次间控制图的连续性]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2003 Apr;11(4):228-31.
3
Immunoassay external quality assessment in Italy: HBsAg and anti-HBs tests.意大利的免疫测定外部质量评估:乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)和乙肝表面抗体(抗-HBs)检测
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1991;27(3):487-93.
4
Interlaboratory quality control of immunometric assays of HBsAg and anti-HBs in Italian laboratories: a two-year experience.意大利实验室中乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)和乙肝表面抗体(抗-HBs)免疫分析的实验室间质量控制:两年经验
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1987;24(2):225-33.
5
Performance of hepatitis B assays on the Bayer ADVIA Centaur Immunoassay System.在拜耳ADVIA Centaur免疫分析系统上进行乙肝检测的性能
Clin Lab. 2004;50(1-2):63-73.
6
Performance of the DiaSorin LIAISON(®) anti-HBs II for the detection of hepatitis B surface antibodies: comparison with the Abbott Architect anti-HBs assay.罗氏诊断 Liaison(®) 抗-HBs II 检测试剂盒用于乙型肝炎表面抗体检测的性能:与雅培 Architect 抗-HBs 检测试剂盒的比较。
J Clin Virol. 2011 Apr;50(4):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
7
[Analytical characteristics of Vitros 3600 analyzer].[Vitros 3600分析仪的分析特性]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2010 Jul-Aug;68(4):465-72. doi: 10.1684/abc.2010.0450.
8
Establishment of National Quality Control Reference Panels and Requirements for Hepatitis B diagnosis reagents in China.中国国家乙肝诊断试剂质量控制参考品的建立及要求
Biologicals. 1993 Sep;21(3):193-6. doi: 10.1006/biol.1993.1075.
9
Hepatitis B viral markers in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan.台湾原发性肝细胞癌患者的乙肝病毒标志物
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981 Mar;66(3):475-9.
10
The detection of alpha-fetoprotein in HBs Ag and HBe Ag carriers.乙肝表面抗原和乙肝e抗原携带者中甲胎蛋白的检测
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1982 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal evaluation of external quality assessment results for CA 15-3, CA 19-9, and CA 125.CA 15-3、CA 19-9和CA 125外部质量评估结果的纵向评估
Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Jun 20;11:1401619. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1401619. eCollection 2024.
2
Longitudinal Evaluation of AFP and CEA External Proficiency Testing Reveals Need for Method Harmonization.甲胎蛋白(AFP)和癌胚抗原(CEA)外部能力验证的纵向评估显示需要方法协调统一。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;13(12):2019. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122019.
3
Lot-to-Lot Variance in Immunoassays-Causes, Consequences, and Solutions.
免疫测定中的批次间差异——原因、后果及解决方案。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 24;13(11):1835. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111835.
4
Proteomics Methodologies: The Search of Protein Biomarkers Using Microfluidic Systems Coupled to Mass Spectrometry.蛋白质组学方法:利用与质谱联用的微流控系统寻找蛋白质生物标志物。
Proteomes. 2023 May 10;11(2):19. doi: 10.3390/proteomes11020019.
5
Analysis of short-term variation and long-term drift during reagent kit lot change in an NABL accredited clinical biochemistry laboratory.NABL认可的临床生物化学实验室中试剂试剂盒批次更换期间的短期变化和长期漂移分析。
J Med Biochem. 2021 Jan 26;40(1):92-98. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-25597.
6
Probe-target hybridization depends on spatial uniformity of initial concentration condition across large-format chips.探针-靶标杂交取决于大型芯片上初始浓度条件的空间均匀性。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 29;10(1):8768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65563-3.
7
A computational solution to improve biomarker reproducibility during long-term projects.一种计算解决方案,可提高长期项目中生物标志物的可重复性。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0209060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209060. eCollection 2019.
8
Lot-to-Lot Variation.批次间差异
Clin Biochem Rev. 2018 May;39(2):51-60.
9
Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于测量人血清或血浆中铁蛋白浓度的实验室方法的性能和可比性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196576. eCollection 2018.
10
Performance of the Dimension TAC assay and comparison of multiple platforms for the measurement of tacrolimus.他克莫司的Dimension TAC检测方法的性能及多种检测平台的比较
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 May;32(4):e22357. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22357. Epub 2017 Nov 17.