• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种计算解决方案,可提高长期项目中生物标志物的可重复性。

A computational solution to improve biomarker reproducibility during long-term projects.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0209060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209060. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0209060
PMID:30995241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469750/
Abstract

Biomarkers are fundamental to basic and clinical research outcomes by reporting host responses and providing insight into disease pathophysiology. Measuring biomarkers with research-use ELISA kits is universal, yet lack of kit standardization and unexpected lot-to-lot variability presents analytic challenges for long-term projects. During an ongoing two-year project measuring plasma biomarkers in cancer patients, control concentrations for one biomarker (PF) decreased significantly after changes in ELISA kit lots. A comprehensive operations review pointed to standard curve shifts with the new kits, an analytic variable that jeopardized data already collected on hundreds of patient samples. After excluding other reasonable contributors to data variability, a computational solution was developed to provide a uniform platform for data analysis across multiple ELISA kit lots. The solution (ELISAtools) was developed within open-access R software in which variability between kits is treated as a batch effect. A defined best-fit Reference standard curve is modelled, a unique Shift factor "S" is calculated for every standard curve and data adjusted accordingly. The averaged S factors for PF ELISA kit lots #1-5 ranged from -0.086 to 0.735, and reduced control inter-assay variability from 62.4% to <9%, within quality control limits. S factors calculated for four other biomarkers provided a quantitative metric to monitor ELISAs over the 10 month study period for quality control purposes. Reproducible biomarker measurements are essential, particularly for long-term projects with valuable patient samples. Use of research-use ELISA kits is ubiquitous and judicious use of this computational solution maximizes biomarker reproducibility.

摘要

生物标志物是基础和临床研究结果的基础,通过报告宿主反应并深入了解疾病病理生理学。使用研究用 ELISA 试剂盒测量生物标志物是通用的,但试剂盒缺乏标准化和批次间不可预测的变异性,这给长期项目带来了分析挑战。在一项正在进行的为期两年的癌症患者血浆生物标志物测量项目中,一种生物标志物(PF)的对照浓度在 ELISA 试剂盒批次变化后显著降低。全面的运营审查指出,新试剂盒的标准曲线发生了偏移,这一分析变量危及了已经在数百个患者样本上收集的数据。在排除了数据变异性的其他合理因素后,开发了一种计算解决方案,为跨多个 ELISA 试剂盒批次的数据分析提供了一个统一的平台。该解决方案(ELISAtools)是在开放获取的 R 软件中开发的,其中试剂盒之间的变异性被视为批处理效应。为每个标准曲线建模一个定义最佳拟合的参考标准曲线,并计算一个独特的偏移因子“S”,然后相应地调整数据。PF ELISA 试剂盒批次 #1-5 的平均 S 因子范围从-0.086 到 0.735,将控制的批内变异性从 62.4%降低到<9%,在质量控制范围内。为其他四个生物标志物计算的 S 因子提供了一个定量指标,用于在 10 个月的研究期间监测 ELISA 以进行质量控制。可重复的生物标志物测量至关重要,特别是对于具有有价值患者样本的长期项目。使用研究用 ELISA 试剂盒是普遍的,明智地使用这种计算解决方案可以最大限度地提高生物标志物的可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/de3325368c84/pone.0209060.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/5b463f11dc5a/pone.0209060.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/739e405571f7/pone.0209060.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/980dfb3b07b3/pone.0209060.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/8d23d4fa72c6/pone.0209060.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/de3325368c84/pone.0209060.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/5b463f11dc5a/pone.0209060.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/739e405571f7/pone.0209060.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/980dfb3b07b3/pone.0209060.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/8d23d4fa72c6/pone.0209060.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e1/6469750/de3325368c84/pone.0209060.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A computational solution to improve biomarker reproducibility during long-term projects.一种计算解决方案,可提高长期项目中生物标志物的可重复性。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0209060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209060. eCollection 2019.
2
[Selecting methods of controls concentration for internal quality control and continuity of control chart between different reagent lots for HBsAg qualitative detection].[乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)定性检测室内质量控制中对照品浓度选择方法及不同试剂批次间控制图的连续性]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2003 Apr;11(4):228-31.
3
Immunoassays (ELISA) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA): report of an EORTC/BIOMED-1 workshop.尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(uPA)的免疫测定(ELISA):欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/生物医学1研讨会报告
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Jul;32A(8):1371-81. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00118-9.
4
Application of the β-expectation tolerance interval to method validation of the M30 and M65 ELISA cell death biomarker assays.β-期望容忍区间在 M30 和 M65ELISA 细胞死亡生物标志物测定方法验证中的应用。
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011 Apr 15;879(13-14):887-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.02.039. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
5
Assessment of assay sensitivity and precision in a malaria antibody ELISA.疟疾抗体酶联免疫吸附测定中检测灵敏度和精密度的评估。
J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2003;24(1):89-112. doi: 10.1081/IAS-120018471.
6
[Comparison of homemade and imported HbsAg ELISA kits on screening blood samples].[国产与进口乙肝表面抗原酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒筛查血样的比较]
Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jun;20(2):84-6.
7
External quality assessment of trans-European multicentre antigen determinations (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type 1 inhibitor (PAI-1) in human breast cancer tissue extracts.欧洲范围内多中心对人乳腺癌组织提取物中尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(uPA)及其1型抑制剂(PAI-1)进行抗原测定(酶联免疫吸附测定)的外部质量评估。
Br J Cancer. 1998 Dec;78(11):1434-41. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.704.
8
Issues on fit-for-purpose validation of a panel of ELISAs for application as biomarkers in clinical trials of anti-Angiogenic drugs.适用于抗血管生成药物临床试验中生物标志物的 ELISA 试剂盒的适用性验证问题。
Br J Cancer. 2010 May 11;102(10):1524-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605661. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
9
Evaluation of result variability with a commercial Johne's disease enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit and repeat testing of samples.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2002 Sep;14(5):423-6. doi: 10.1177/104063870201400513.
10
Quantitative validation and comparison of multiplex cytokine kits.多重细胞因子检测试剂盒的定量验证与比较
J Biomol Screen. 2010 Jun;15(5):562-8. doi: 10.1177/1087057110362099. Epub 2010 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring In Vitro Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteodifferentiation via Vibrational Microspectroscopy: A Review.通过振动光谱探索间充质干细胞的体外成骨分化:综述
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2025 Oct;21(7):2043-2065. doi: 10.1007/s12015-025-10943-3. Epub 2025 Jul 26.
2
Metabolic markers detect early ostedifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from multiple donors.代谢标志物可检测来自多个供体的间充质干细胞的早期成骨分化。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025 Jun 7;16(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04419-x.
3
A single-blind, randomized, controlled contingency management trial on physiological indices and biomarkers of cardiovascular health in people with cocaine use disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging.多模态成像期间检测到潜在严重偶然发现的影响。
Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Nov 30;2:114. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13181.3. eCollection 2017.
2
Return of Research Results to Study Participants: Uncharted and Untested.研究结果返回研究参与者:未知且未经检验。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):435-436. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7898.
3
Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Emergence of the Solution to an Important Unmet Need.用于阿尔茨海默病的脑脊液生物标志物:解决一项重要未满足需求的方法的出现
一项针对可卡因使用障碍患者心血管健康生理指标和生物标志物的单盲、随机、对照应急管理试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Jun 1;271:112642. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112642. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
4
Influence of cocaine use reduction on markers of immune function.减少可卡因使用对免疫功能标志物的影响。
J Neuroimmunol. 2024 Dec 15;397:578470. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2024.578470. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
5
A concise guide to essential R packages for analyses of DNA, RNA, and proteins.用于DNA、RNA和蛋白质分析的必备R包简明指南。
Mol Cells. 2024 Nov;47(11):100120. doi: 10.1016/j.mocell.2024.100120. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
6
Trimer IgG and neutralising antibody response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in individuals with sarcoidosis.结节病患者对新冠病毒mRNA疫苗的三聚体IgG及中和抗体反应
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Jan 3;9(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00025-2022. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Molecular diagnostics in neurotrauma: Are there reliable biomarkers and effective methods for their detection?神经创伤中的分子诊断:是否存在可靠的生物标志物及其有效的检测方法?
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Sep 29;9:1017916. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1017916. eCollection 2022.
8
FGF21 contributes to metabolic improvements elicited by combination therapy with exenatide and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes.成纤维细胞生长因子 21 有助于二甲双胍联合吡格列酮和艾塞那肽治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的代谢改善。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Aug 1;323(2):E123-E132. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00050.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
9
Molecular correlates of response to eribulin and pembrolizumab in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌中对艾瑞布林和帕博利珠单抗应答的分子相关性。
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 21;12(1):5563. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25769-z.
EJIFCC. 2013 Feb 21;24(3):97-104. eCollection 2013 Feb.
4
A Method and On-Line Tool for Maximum Likelihood Calibration of Immunoblots and Other Measurements That Are Quantified in Batches.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 23;11(2):e0149575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149575. eCollection 2016.
5
A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation.免疫分析方法验证实用指南。
Front Neurol. 2015 Aug 19;6:179. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00179. eCollection 2015.
6
Clinically relevant lot-to-lot reagent difference in a commercial immunoturbidimetric assay for glycated hemoglobin A1c.用于糖化血红蛋白A1c的商业免疫比浊法中与临床相关的批次间试剂差异。
Clin Biochem. 2015 Nov;48(16-17):1167-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Evaluating the effects of preanalytical variables on the stability of the human plasma proteome.评估分析前变量对人血浆蛋白质组稳定性的影响。
Anal Biochem. 2015 Jun 1;478:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
8
Failure of current laboratory protocols to detect lot-to-lot reagent differences: findings and possible solutions.现行实验室方案未能检测到批间试剂差异:发现与可能的解决方案。
Clin Chem. 2013 Aug;59(8):1187-94. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.205070. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
9
Psychosocial consequences and severity of disclosed incidental findings from whole-body MRI in a general population study.全身磁共振成像在一般人群研究中揭示偶然发现的心理社会后果和严重程度。
Eur Radiol. 2013 May;23(5):1343-51. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2723-8. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
10
ELISA rescue protocol: recovery of sample concentrations from an assay with an unsuccessful standard curve.ELISA 挽救方案:从标准曲线失败的测定中恢复样品浓度。
Methods. 2013 May 15;61(1):69-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 12.