• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性病对未诊断糖尿病患者的 HbA(1c)测定的影响。

The impact of acute illness on HbA(1c) determination of undiagnosed diabetes.

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System, Queens, NY, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Oct;28(7):603-7. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2315.

DOI:10.1002/dmrr.2315
PMID:22585664
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To improve diabetes screening efforts, the American Diabetes Association now recommends haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) as a diagnostic test, increasing access to patients found in acute care environments. However, the influence of acute illness and care on HbA(1c) levels has not been well studied. To address this, we evaluated for intra-patient differences in HbA(1c) assessed in the emergency department (ED) and after recovery from the acute illness.

METHODS

Adult patients with no known history of diabetes were tested for HbA(1c) during an ED and scheduled follow-up visit. HbA(1c) differences between the two visits were compared using limits of agreement with 95% confidence intervals. The frequency of individuals who changed diagnostic categories (using ≥6.5% to classify newly diagnosed diabetes) from ED to follow-up was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 589 patients were included with a mean age of 50 years, and 57/589 (9.7%) had an ED HbA(1c)  ≥ 6.5% with the average follow-up visit 45 days after the ED visit. The mean ED HbA(1c) was 5.67% (±0.86), and the follow-up HbA(1c) was 5.65% (±0.89), (difference -0.0129%, 95% limits of agreement -0.740, 0.714). The ED and follow-up HbA(1c) was highly correlated (r² = 0.829). Although on follow-up almost all patients were classified in the same diagnostic category as in the ED, 17 patients had an HbA(1c)  ≥ 6.5% in the ED and an HbA(1c)  < 6.5%. On follow-up most patients (14/17) still fell in an abnormal range (6.0-6.5%).

CONCLUSION

The HbA(1c) value is not substantially affected by acute illness and is feasible as a screening assay for diabetes in the acute care setting such as an ED.

摘要

目的

为了改善糖尿病筛查工作,美国糖尿病协会现在推荐血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)作为诊断检测,增加了在急性护理环境中发现的患者的就诊机会。然而,急性疾病和治疗对 HbA1c 水平的影响尚未得到很好的研究。为了解决这个问题,我们评估了在急诊科(ED)和急性疾病康复后评估的患者内 HbA1c 的差异。

方法

在 ED 和计划的随访期间,对无已知糖尿病病史的成年患者进行 HbA1c 检测。使用 95%置信区间的一致性界限比较两次就诊的 HbA1c 差异。确定从 ED 到随访时诊断类别改变(使用≥6.5%来分类新诊断的糖尿病)的个体的频率。

结果

共纳入 589 例患者,平均年龄为 50 岁,57/589(9.7%)在 ED 的 HbA1c  ≥ 6.5%,平均随访时间为 ED 就诊后 45 天。ED 的平均 HbA1c 为 5.67%(±0.86),随访时的 HbA1c 为 5.65%(±0.89),(差异-0.0129%,95%一致性界限-0.740,0.714)。ED 和随访的 HbA1c 高度相关(r² = 0.829)。尽管在随访时,几乎所有患者都被归入与 ED 相同的诊断类别,但有 17 名患者在 ED 时的 HbA1c  ≥ 6.5%,而在 HbA1c  < 6.5%。在随访时,大多数患者(14/17)仍处于异常范围(6.0-6.5%)。

结论

HbA1c 值不会受到急性疾病的实质性影响,并且可以作为 ED 等急性护理环境中的糖尿病筛查检测。

相似文献

1
The impact of acute illness on HbA(1c) determination of undiagnosed diabetes.急性病对未诊断糖尿病患者的 HbA(1c)测定的影响。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Oct;28(7):603-7. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2315.
2
Hemoglobin A1c as a screen for previously undiagnosed prediabetes and diabetes in an acute-care setting.血红蛋白 A1c 在急性护理环境中用于筛查先前未诊断的糖尿病前期和糖尿病。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1908-12. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0996. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
3
Relationship between glycated hemoglobin and glucose concentrations in the adult Galician population: selection of optimal glycated hemoglobin cut-off points as a diagnostic tool of diabetes mellitus.加利西亚成年人群糖化血红蛋白与血糖浓度之间的关系:选择最佳糖化血红蛋白切点作为糖尿病的诊断工具
Endocrinol Nutr. 2012 Oct;59(8):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
4
Undiagnosed diabetes mellitus and metabolic control assessed by HbA(1c) among residents of nursing homes.疗养院居民中未诊断出的糖尿病及通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)评估的代谢控制情况
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2001;109(6):326-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17299.
5
Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of european prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk).欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC - 诺福克)诺福克队列男性中的糖化血红蛋白、糖尿病与死亡率
BMJ. 2001 Jan 6;322(7277):15-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7277.15.
6
Comparison of glycemic variability and glycated hemoglobin as risk factors of coronary artery disease in patients with undiagnosed diabetes.比较血糖变异性和糖化血红蛋白作为未诊断糖尿病患者冠心病的危险因素。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Jan;125(1):38-43.
7
Performance of HbA(1c) for detecting newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes in Chinese communities living in Beijing.HbA(1c) 在检测居住在北京的华人群体中新诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期中的表现。
Diabet Med. 2009 Dec;26(12):1262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02831.x.
8
Detecting undiagnosed diabetes using glycated haemoglobin: an automated screening test in hospitalised patients.使用糖化血红蛋白检测未诊断的糖尿病:住院患者的自动筛查试验。
Med J Aust. 2011 Feb 21;194(4):160-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb02954.x.
9
Oral glucose tolerance test and HbA₁c for diagnosis of diabetes in patients undergoing coronary angiography: [corrected] the Silent Diabetes Study.口服葡萄糖耐量试验和糖化血红蛋白用于冠状动脉造影患者的糖尿病诊断:[校正]沉默糖尿病研究。
Diabetologia. 2011 Nov;54(11):2923-30. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2253-y. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
10
Racial comparisons of health care and glycemic control for African American and white diabetic adults in an urban managed care organization.城市管理式医疗组织中非洲裔美国和白人成年糖尿病患者的医疗保健与血糖控制的种族比较。
Dis Manag. 2004 Spring;7(1):25-34. doi: 10.1089/109350704322918970.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycated hemoglobin A1c level on the day of emergency surgery is a marker of premorbid glycemic control: a retrospective observational study.急诊手术当日糖化血红蛋白A1c水平是术前血糖控制情况的一项指标:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Nov 30;18(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0641-2.
2
Fructosamine: A Negative Acute Phase Reactant.果糖胺:一种负性急性期反应物。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):234-235. doi: 10.1177/1932296817712527. Epub 2017 May 31.
3
Significance of HbA1c and its measurement in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: US experience.
糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的意义及其检测在糖尿病诊断中的应用:美国的经验
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014 Oct 20;7:487-94. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S39092. eCollection 2014.