• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决肥胖不平等问题:一项系统评价公共卫生干预措施减少儿童肥胖社会经济不平等的有效性的方案。

Tackling inequalities in obesity: a protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of public health interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children.

机构信息

Department of Geography, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University Queen's Campus, University Boulevard, Stockton-on-Tees, TS17 6BH, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 23;1:16. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-16.

DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-1-16
PMID:22587775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3351709/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence of the impact of overweight and obesity on short- and long-term functioning, health and well-being. Internationally, childhood obesity rates continue to rise in some countries (for example, Mexico, India, China and Canada), although there is emerging evidence of a slowing of this increase or a plateauing in some age groups. In most European countries, the United States and Australia, however, socioeconomic inequalities in relation to obesity and risk factors for obesity are widening. Addressing inequalities in obesity, therefore, has a very high profile on the public health and health services agendas. However, there is a lack of accessible policy-ready evidence on what works in terms of interventions to reduce inequalities in obesity.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This article describes the protocol for a National Health Service Trust (NHS) National Institute for Health Research-funded systematic review of public health interventions at the individual, community and societal levels which might reduce socioeconomic inequalities in relation to obesity amongst children ages 0 to 18 years. The studies will be selected only if (1) they included a primary outcome that is a proxy for body fatness and (2) examined differential effects with regard to socioeconomic status (education, income, occupation, social class, deprivation and poverty) or the intervention was targeted specifically at disadvantaged groups (for example, children of the unemployed, lone parents, low income and so on) or at people who live in deprived areas. A rigorous and inclusive international literature search will be conducted for randomised and nonrandomised controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies (with and/or without control groups) and prospective repeat cross-sectional studies (with and/or without control groups). The following electronic databases will be searched: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Science Citation Index, ASSIA, IBSS, Sociological Abstracts and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database. Database searches will be supplemented with website and grey literature searches. No studies will be excluded on the basis of language, country of origin or publication date. Study inclusion, data extraction and quality appraisal will be conducted by two reviewers. Meta-analysis and narrative synthesis will be conducted. The main analysis will examine the effects of (1) individual, (2) community and (3) societal level public health interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in childhood obesity. Interventions will be characterised by their level of action and their approach to tackling inequalities. Contextual information on how such public health interventions are organised, implemented and delivered will also be examined.

DISCUSSION

In this review, we consider public health strategies which reduce and prevent inequalities in the prevalence of childhood obesity, highlight any gaps in the evidence base and seek to establish how such public health interventions are organised, implemented and delivered. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001740.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf0/3351709/56801fdbe0c1/2046-4053-1-16-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf0/3351709/56801fdbe0c1/2046-4053-1-16-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf0/3351709/56801fdbe0c1/2046-4053-1-16-1.jpg
摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,超重和肥胖对短期和长期的功能、健康和幸福感都有影响。在国际上,一些国家(如墨西哥、印度、中国和加拿大)的儿童肥胖率仍在持续上升,尽管在一些年龄组中,肥胖率的增长已经出现放缓或趋于平稳。然而,在大多数欧洲国家、美国和澳大利亚,与肥胖和肥胖风险因素相关的社会经济不平等现象却在加剧。因此,解决肥胖不平等问题在公共卫生和卫生服务议程中占据着非常重要的地位。然而,在减少儿童肥胖相关社会经济不平等的干预措施方面,可用的、有政策准备的证据非常缺乏。

方法和设计

本文描述了一项由英国国家卫生服务信托基金(NHS)和英国国家健康研究所资助的系统评价方案,该方案旨在评估个人、社区和社会各级的公共卫生干预措施,这些措施可能会减少 0 至 18 岁儿童的肥胖相关社会经济不平等。只有当研究(1)包含身体脂肪程度的替代主要结果,(2)检验与社会经济地位(教育、收入、职业、社会阶层、剥夺和贫困)相关的差异效应,或干预措施专门针对弱势群体(例如失业者的子女、单亲父母、低收入者等)或居住在贫困地区的人时,才会选择这些研究。将对随机和非随机对照试验、前瞻性和回顾性队列研究(有和/或没有对照组)以及前瞻性重复横断面研究(有和/或没有对照组)进行严格和全面的国际文献检索。将检索以下电子数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、社会科学引文索引、ASSIA、IBSS、社会学摘要和英国国家卫生服务经济评价数据库。数据库搜索将辅以网站和灰色文献搜索。不会根据语言、原籍国或出版日期排除研究。两名评审员将进行研究纳入、数据提取和质量评估。将进行荟萃分析和叙述性综合。主要分析将考察(1)个人层面、(2)社区层面和(3)社会层面公共卫生干预措施对儿童肥胖社会经济不平等的影响。干预措施的特点将是其行动水平及其解决不平等问题的方法。还将审查关于此类公共卫生干预措施的组织、实施和交付情况的背景信息。

讨论

在这项综述中,我们考虑了减少和预防儿童肥胖患病率不平等的公共卫生策略,强调了证据基础中的差距,并试图确定这些公共卫生干预措施是如何组织、实施和交付的。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42011001740。

相似文献

1
Tackling inequalities in obesity: a protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of public health interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children.解决肥胖不平等问题:一项系统评价公共卫生干预措施减少儿童肥胖社会经济不平等的有效性的方案。
Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 23;1:16. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-16.
2
Tackling inequalities in obesity: a protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of public health interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity among adults.解决肥胖不平等问题:一项系统评价公共卫生干预措施减少成年人肥胖社会经济不平等的有效性的方案。
Syst Rev. 2013 May 10;2:27. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-27.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
5
Interventions to reduce inequalities in avoidable hospital admissions: explanatory framework and systematic review protocol.减少可避免住院治疗不平等的干预措施:解释框架和系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e035429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035429.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
A systematic review of the effectiveness of individual, community and societal-level interventions at reducing socio-economic inequalities in obesity among adults.一项关于个体、社区和社会层面干预措施在减少成年人肥胖方面社会经济不平等有效性的系统评价。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Dec;38(12):1483-90. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.75. Epub 2014 May 12.
8
9
A systematic review of the effectiveness of individual, community and societal level interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children.一项关于个体、社区和社会层面干预措施在减少儿童肥胖方面社会经济不平等有效性的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 11;14:834. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-834.
10
Community pharmacy interventions for public health priorities: protocol for a systematic review of community pharmacy-delivered smoking, alcohol and weight management interventions.社区药房针对公共卫生重点的干预措施:社区药房提供的戒烟、限酒和体重管理干预措施的系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 22;3:93. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in total and regional body fat and their association with BMI in UK-born White and South Asian children: findings from the Born in Bradford birth cohort.英国出生的白人和南亚儿童的总体和局部体脂差异及其与BMI的关联:来自布拉德福德出生队列的研究结果
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Apr 1;6:65. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16659.3. eCollection 2021.
2
Association of body mass index and its classifications with gray matter volume in individuals with a wide range of body mass index group: A whole-brain magnetic resonance imaging study.体重指数及其分类与广泛体重指数组个体脑灰质体积的关联:一项全脑磁共振成像研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 8;16:926804. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.926804. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence that the prevalence of childhood overweight is plateauing: data from nine countries.儿童超重患病率趋于平稳的证据:来自九个国家的数据。
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Oct;6(5-6):342-60. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2011.605895. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
2
The levelling off of the obesity epidemic since the year 1999--a review of evidence and perspectives.自 1999 年以来肥胖流行率趋于平稳——对现有证据和观点的综述。
Obes Rev. 2010 Dec;11(12):835-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00810.x. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
3
Reducing health inequalities in priority public health conditions: using rapid review to develop proposals for evidence-based policy.
Breakfast habits, nutritional status and their relationship with academic performance in elementary school students of Tehran, Iran.
伊朗德黑兰小学生的早餐习惯、营养状况及其与学业成绩的关系。
Med Pharm Rep. 2019 Jan;92(1):52-58. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-956. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
The Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in Children Under 5 Years in Tehran, Iran, in 2012: A Population-Based Study.2012年伊朗德黑兰5岁以下儿童超重和肥胖的患病率:一项基于人群的研究
Res Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Jan 6;5(1):e30425. doi: 10.5812/cardiovascmed.30425. eCollection 2016 Feb.
5
Socioeconomic gradients in cardiovascular risk in Canadian children and adolescents.加拿大儿童和青少年心血管疾病风险的社会经济梯度
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Feb;36(2):21-31. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.2.02.
6
[Anthropometric indicators of obesity in the prediction of high body fat in adolescents].[青少年肥胖的人体测量指标在预测高体脂中的应用]
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2015 Jan-Mar;33(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rpped.2014.06.007. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
7
Jamie's Ministry of Food: quasi-experimental evaluation of immediate and sustained impacts of a cooking skills program in Australia.杰米的食品部:澳大利亚一项烹饪技能项目即时和持续影响的准实验评估
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 16;9(12):e114673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114673. eCollection 2014.
8
Weighing up the evidence: a systematic review of the effectiveness of workplace interventions to tackle socio-economic inequalities in obesity.权衡证据:对解决肥胖问题中社会经济不平等的工作场所干预措施有效性的系统评价。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Dec;37(4):659-70. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu077. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
A systematic review of the effectiveness of individual, community and societal level interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children.一项关于个体、社区和社会层面干预措施在减少儿童肥胖方面社会经济不平等有效性的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 11;14:834. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-834.
10
An intervention for improving the lifestyle habits of kindergarten children in Israel: a cluster-randomised controlled trial investigation.以色列一项改善幼儿园儿童生活习惯的干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Jun;18(9):1537-44. doi: 10.1017/S136898001400024X. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
减少优先公共卫生条件下的健康不平等:利用快速审查制定基于证据的政策建议。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2010 Dec;32(4):496-505. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq028. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
4
Flexible working conditions and their effects on employee health and wellbeing.灵活的工作条件及其对员工健康和福祉的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2010(2):CD008009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008009.pub2.
5
Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews.解决更广泛的健康社会决定因素和健康不平等问题:来自系统评价的证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Apr;64(4):284-91. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.082743. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
6
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.用于报告评估医疗保健干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析的PRISMA声明:解释与详述
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.
7
Environmental and societal influences acting on cardiovascular risk factors and disease at a population level: a review.环境和社会因素对人群心血管危险因素和疾病的影响:综述。
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;38(6):1580-94. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn258. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
8
Interventions for treating obesity in children.儿童肥胖症的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD001872. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001872.pub2.
9
Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions.审视复杂社会干预的证据:在组织层面工作场所干预对健康影响的系统评价中评估实施情况。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jan;63(1):4-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.071233. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
10
"A hard day's night?" The effects of Compressed Working Week interventions on the health and work-life balance of shift workers: a systematic review.《“漫长的一天”?压缩工作周干预措施对轮班工人健康及工作与生活平衡的影响:一项系统综述》
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Sep;62(9):764-77. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.067249.