Hillier-Brown Frances C, Bambra Clare L, Cairns Joanne-Marie, Kasim Adetayo, Moore Helen J, Summerbell Carolyn D
Department of Geography, Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 11;14:834. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-834.
Tackling childhood obesity is one of the major contemporary public health policy challenges and vital in terms of addressing socioeconomic health inequalities.We aimed to systematically review studies of the effectiveness of interventions (individual, community and societal) operating via different approaches (targeted or universal) in reducing socio-economic inequalities in obesity-related outcomes amongst children.
Nine electronic databases were searched from start date to October 2012 along with website and grey literature searches. The review examined the best available international evidence from interventions that aimed to prevent obesity, treat obesity, or improve obesity-related behaviours (diet and/or physical activity) amongst children (aged 0-18 years) in any setting and country, so long as they provided relevant information and analysis on both socioeconomic status and obesity-related outcomes. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted using established mechanisms and narrative synthesis was conducted.
We located 23 studies that provided the 'best available' (strongest methodologically) international evidence. At the individual level (n = 4), there was indicative evidence that screen time reduction and mentoring health promotion interventions could be effective in reducing inequalities in obesity. For the community level interventions (n = 17), evidence was inconclusive - with some studies suggesting that school-based health promotion activities and community-based group-based programmes were effective in reducing obesity - others not. Societal level evaluations were few (n = 1). However, there was no evidence to suggest that any of these intervention types increase inequalities and several studies found that interventions could at least prevent the widening of inequalities in obesity. The majority of studies were from America and were of 6-12 year old children.
The review has found only limited evidence although some individual and community based interventions may be effective in reducing socio-economic inequalities in obesity-related outcomes amongst children but further research is required, particularly of more complex, societal level interventions and amongst adolescents.
应对儿童肥胖问题是当代公共卫生政策面临的主要挑战之一,对于解决社会经济健康不平等问题至关重要。我们旨在系统回顾通过不同方法(针对性或普遍性)开展的干预措施(个体、社区和社会层面)在减少儿童肥胖相关结果的社会经济不平等方面的有效性研究。
从起始日期至2012年10月检索了九个电子数据库,并进行了网站和灰色文献检索。该综述考察了旨在预防肥胖、治疗肥胖或改善儿童(0至18岁)在任何环境和国家的肥胖相关行为(饮食和/或身体活动)的干预措施的最佳国际证据,只要这些措施提供了关于社会经济地位和肥胖相关结果的相关信息及分析。使用既定机制进行数据提取和质量评估,并进行叙述性综合分析。
我们找到了23项提供“最佳可用”(方法学上最强)国际证据的研究。在个体层面(n = 4),有迹象表明减少屏幕时间和指导健康促进干预措施可能有效减少肥胖不平等。对于社区层面的干预措施(n = 17),证据尚无定论——一些研究表明基于学校的健康促进活动和基于社区的团体项目在减少肥胖方面有效——其他研究则不然。社会层面的评估很少(n = 1)。然而,没有证据表明这些干预类型中的任何一种会增加不平等,并且多项研究发现干预措施至少可以防止肥胖不平等的扩大。大多数研究来自美国,研究对象为6至12岁的儿童。
该综述仅发现了有限的证据,尽管一些基于个体和社区的干预措施可能有效减少儿童肥胖相关结果的社会经济不平等,但仍需要进一步研究,特别是更复杂的社会层面干预措施以及青少年群体中的研究。