Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2012 Aug 1;12(4):263-77. doi: 10.1007/BF03261835.
Between 5% and 20% of patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) develop intolerance. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) can be used as an alternative treatment.
In this study we aimed to evaluate the tolerability of ARBs in patients with intolerance to ACE inhibitors.
The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE/EMBASE via Dialog, CENTRAL, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ARBs in patients with intolerance to ACE inhibitors were selected.
Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated assuming the random effects method. We found 11 RCTs comparing ARBs with ACE inhibitors, diuretics, or placebo, and one RCT comparing high-dose versus low-dose ARB.
ARBs had fewer cough events versus ACE inhibitors (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28, 0.48). ARBs had drug discontinuation (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.84, 1.17) and cough risk (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.74, 1.39) rates similar to placebo. Angioedema risk with ARBs was also similar to placebo (RR 1.62; 95% CI 0.17, 15.79). Compared with placebo, hypotension (RR 2.63; 95% CI 1.77, 3.92), renal dysfunction (RR 2.07; 95% CI 1.45, 2.95) and hyperkalemia (RR 3.37; 95% CI 1.60, 7.11) were more frequent with ARBs.
ACE inhibitor rechallenge should be discouraged in patients with previous intolerance to ACE inhibitors due to a higher risk of cough. ARBs had cough and angioedema incidences similar to placebo. Despite a significantly higher incidence of hypotension, renal dysfunction and hyperkalemia, discontinuation of ARBs was similar to placebo.
在接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE 抑制剂)治疗的患者中,有 5%至 20%会出现不耐受。血管紧张素 II 型 1 型受体拮抗剂(血管紧张素受体阻滞剂 [ARB])可用作替代治疗。
本研究旨在评估 ARB 在 ACE 抑制剂不耐受患者中的耐受性。
电子数据库 PubMed、MEDLINE/EMBASE 通过 Dialog、CENTRAL 和 ISI Web of Knowledge 进行检索。
选择评估 ARB 在 ACE 抑制剂不耐受患者中的 RCT。
采用随机效应法估计风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。我们发现了 11 项比较 ARB 与 ACE 抑制剂、利尿剂或安慰剂的 RCT,以及一项比较高剂量与低剂量 ARB 的 RCT。
ARB 较 ACE 抑制剂组咳嗽事件更少(RR 0.37;95%CI 0.28,0.48)。ARB 停药(RR 0.99;95%CI 0.84,1.17)和咳嗽风险(RR 1.01;95%CI 0.74,1.39)率与安慰剂相似。ARB 类药物引起血管水肿的风险也与安慰剂相似(RR 1.62;95%CI 0.17,15.79)。与安慰剂相比,ARB 类药物更易发生低血压(RR 2.63;95%CI 1.77,3.92)、肾功能不全(RR 2.07;95%CI 1.45,2.95)和高钾血症(RR 3.37;95%CI 1.60,7.11)。
由于 ACE 抑制剂再次使用时咳嗽风险较高,应劝阻以前对 ACE 抑制剂不耐受的患者再次使用 ACE 抑制剂。ARB 类药物的咳嗽和血管水肿发生率与安慰剂相似。尽管低血压、肾功能不全和高钾血症的发生率明显较高,但 ARB 类药物的停药率与安慰剂相似。