Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, Rayne Institute, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, SE1 7EH London, England.
Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):242-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112004. Epub 2012 May 15.
To investigate whether a dual inversion-recovery (IR) prepulse improves scar-to-blood contrast and expert confidence and consistency at late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of myocardial scar compared with the standard IR technique at 3.0 T.
The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. Twelve men (mean age±standard deviation, 63 years±8) with known myocardial scar underwent MR imaging 10, 20, and 30 minutes after administration of 0.2 mmol/kg gadobutrol with a standard and dual IR sequence. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured by using region-of-interest analysis, and data were compared with the analysis of variance test. Two experts measured scar size and transmurality, and data were compared with the Student t test and Bland-Altman test. Experts assigned confidence scores for scar detection and transmurality, which were compared with a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.
Patient data showed improved scar-to-blood CNR for the dual IR technique compared with the standard IR technique at all time points (P<.05). For images obtained 20 minutes after contrast material administration, the dual IR sequence provided higher confidence scores for scar detection and transmurality assessment (P<.05) and resulted in more consistent assessment of scar size and transmurality between readers compared with the IR sequence (P<.05).
In this preliminary patient study, the dual IR prepulse improved contrast, scar visualization, and expert confidence and reduced expert differences in transmurality and scar size assessment compared with the standard IR technique.
在 3.0T 磁共振(MR)成像中,研究双反转恢复(IR)预脉冲是否能改善心肌瘢痕的晚期钆增强后与标准 IR 技术相比的瘢痕与血液对比度以及专家的信心和一致性。
本研究经当地伦理委员会批准,所有患者均签署了书面知情同意书。12 名男性(平均年龄±标准差,63 岁±8 岁)已知存在心肌瘢痕,在注射 0.2mmol/kg 钆布醇后 10、20 和 30 分钟分别行标准和双 IR 序列 MR 成像。采用感兴趣区分析测量对比噪声比(CNR),并采用方差分析检验进行数据比较。两名专家测量瘢痕大小和透壁性,并采用学生 t 检验和 Bland-Altman 检验进行数据比较。专家对瘢痕检测和透壁性的置信评分进行评估,并采用 Wilcoxon 配对符号秩检验进行比较。
患者数据显示,与标准 IR 技术相比,双 IR 技术在所有时间点的瘢痕与血液 CNR 均得到改善(P<.05)。在造影剂注射后 20 分钟获得的图像中,双 IR 序列在瘢痕检测和透壁性评估方面提供了更高的置信评分(P<.05),与 IR 序列相比,读者之间对瘢痕大小和透壁性的评估更为一致(P<.05)。
在本初步患者研究中,与标准 IR 技术相比,双 IR 预脉冲可提高对比度、瘢痕可视化效果和专家信心,并降低透壁性和瘢痕大小评估的专家差异。