Suppr超能文献

正中神经体感诱发电位和格拉斯哥昏迷量表作为头部受伤昏迷患者预后的预测指标。

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the Glasgow Coma Scale as predictors of outcome in comatose patients with head injuries.

作者信息

Houlden D A, Li C, Schwartz M L, Katic M

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1990 Nov;27(5):701-7; discussion 707-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199011000-00006.

Abstract

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) grades and Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) scores were obtained from 51 patients with head injuries within 1 week after the injury to determine the relationship of these scores, both individually and combined, to outcome scores obtained more than 6 months after the injury. SSEP grading was based on the presence or absence of the cortical evoked potential, the amplitude of the early cortically generated P22 wave form, and the conduction time through the brain (P/N13-N20 interpeak latency). SSEP responses from both sides of the brain were combined and graded from 1 to 6. The GCS was graded without the verbal component (maximum score, 10), because all patients were intubated. All patients were unresponsive to commands. Median SSEP grades correlated better with Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel Index scores (R = 0.57 and 0.64, respectively; P less than 0.00001) than GCS scores did (R = 0.35 and 0.37, respectively, P less than 0.00001), and combining SSEP grades and GCS scores did not improve the predictive power of the model (R = 0.57 and 0.64, respectively; P less than 0.00001). All SSEP Grade 1 patients (n = 13) either died or remained in a vegetative state. In contrast, all SSEP Grade 6 patients (n = 7) had a moderate disability or good recovery. This study demonstrates the prognostic value of early quantitative median nerve SSEP grading for patients with head injuries who are unresponsive to commands within 1 week after the injury.

摘要

在51例头部受伤患者受伤后1周内获取正中神经体感诱发电位(SSEP)分级和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分,以确定这些评分单独及联合起来与受伤6个月后获得的预后评分之间的关系。SSEP分级基于皮质诱发电位的有无、早期皮质产生的P22波形的振幅以及通过大脑的传导时间(P/N13 - N20峰间潜伏期)。将大脑两侧的SSEP反应合并并从1到6进行分级。GCS评分不包括言语部分(最高分10分),因为所有患者均已插管。所有患者对指令均无反应。正中SSEP分级与格拉斯哥预后量表和巴氏指数评分的相关性更好(分别为R = 0.57和0.64;P < 0.00001),而与GCS评分的相关性较差(分别为R = 0.35和0.37,P < 0.00001),并且将SSEP分级和GCS评分结合起来并没有提高模型的预测能力(分别为R = 0.57和0.64;P < 0.00001)。所有SSEP 1级患者(n = 13)要么死亡,要么处于植物人状态。相比之下,所有SSEP 6级患者(n = 7)都有中度残疾或恢复良好。本研究证明了早期定量正中神经SSEP分级对受伤后1周内对指令无反应的头部受伤患者的预后价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验