Houlden D A, Li C, Schwartz M L, Katic M
Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neurosurgery. 1990 Nov;27(5):701-7; discussion 707-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199011000-00006.
Median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) grades and Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) scores were obtained from 51 patients with head injuries within 1 week after the injury to determine the relationship of these scores, both individually and combined, to outcome scores obtained more than 6 months after the injury. SSEP grading was based on the presence or absence of the cortical evoked potential, the amplitude of the early cortically generated P22 wave form, and the conduction time through the brain (P/N13-N20 interpeak latency). SSEP responses from both sides of the brain were combined and graded from 1 to 6. The GCS was graded without the verbal component (maximum score, 10), because all patients were intubated. All patients were unresponsive to commands. Median SSEP grades correlated better with Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel Index scores (R = 0.57 and 0.64, respectively; P less than 0.00001) than GCS scores did (R = 0.35 and 0.37, respectively, P less than 0.00001), and combining SSEP grades and GCS scores did not improve the predictive power of the model (R = 0.57 and 0.64, respectively; P less than 0.00001). All SSEP Grade 1 patients (n = 13) either died or remained in a vegetative state. In contrast, all SSEP Grade 6 patients (n = 7) had a moderate disability or good recovery. This study demonstrates the prognostic value of early quantitative median nerve SSEP grading for patients with head injuries who are unresponsive to commands within 1 week after the injury.
在51例头部受伤患者受伤后1周内获取正中神经体感诱发电位(SSEP)分级和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分,以确定这些评分单独及联合起来与受伤6个月后获得的预后评分之间的关系。SSEP分级基于皮质诱发电位的有无、早期皮质产生的P22波形的振幅以及通过大脑的传导时间(P/N13 - N20峰间潜伏期)。将大脑两侧的SSEP反应合并并从1到6进行分级。GCS评分不包括言语部分(最高分10分),因为所有患者均已插管。所有患者对指令均无反应。正中SSEP分级与格拉斯哥预后量表和巴氏指数评分的相关性更好(分别为R = 0.57和0.64;P < 0.00001),而与GCS评分的相关性较差(分别为R = 0.35和0.37,P < 0.00001),并且将SSEP分级和GCS评分结合起来并没有提高模型的预测能力(分别为R = 0.57和0.64;P < 0.00001)。所有SSEP 1级患者(n = 13)要么死亡,要么处于植物人状态。相比之下,所有SSEP 6级患者(n = 7)都有中度残疾或恢复良好。本研究证明了早期定量正中神经SSEP分级对受伤后1周内对指令无反应的头部受伤患者的预后价值。