Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205-2113, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1286-97. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300759. Epub 2012 May 17.
Vitamin A supplementation is a public health intervention that clinical trials have suggested can significantly improve child survival in the developing world. Yet, prominent scientists in India have questioned its scientific validity, opposed its implementation, and accused its advocates of corruption and greed. It is ironic that these opponents were among the pioneers of populationwide vitamin A supplementation for ocular health. Historically, complex interests have shaped vitamin A supplementation resistance in India. Local social and nutritional revolutions and shifting international paradigms of global health have played a role. Other resistance movements in Indian history, such as those in response to campaigns for bacillus Calmette-Guérin and novel vaccines, have been structured around similar themes. Public health resistance is shaped by the cultural and political context in which it develops. Armed with knowledge of the history of a region and patterns of past resistance, public health practitioners can better understand how to negotiate global health conflicts.
维生素 A 补充剂是一种公共卫生干预措施,临床试验表明,它可以显著提高发展中国家儿童的生存率。然而,印度的一些知名科学家对其科学有效性提出了质疑,反对实施该措施,并指责其倡导者腐败和贪婪。具有讽刺意味的是,这些反对者曾是在印度开展全民维生素 A 补充剂以促进眼部健康的先驱。从历史上看,复杂的利益关系塑造了印度对维生素 A 补充剂的抵制。当地的社会和营养革命以及不断变化的全球卫生国际范式都发挥了作用。印度历史上的其他抵抗运动,如针对卡介苗和新型疫苗的运动,其结构也围绕着类似的主题。公共卫生抵制是由其发展的文化和政治背景塑造的。了解一个地区的历史和过去抵抗的模式,公共卫生工作者可以更好地理解如何应对全球卫生冲突。