Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(3):308-14. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.653842.
Many new safety systems are entering the market. Vision Zero is a safety strategy aiming at the elimination of fatalities and impairing injuries by the use of a holistic model for safe traffic to develop a safe system. The aim of this article is to analyze fatalities in modern cars with respect to the Vision Zero model with special respect to electronic stability control (ESC) systems and modern seat belt reminders (SBRs). The model is used to identify and understand cases where cars with ESC systems lost control and where occupants were unbelted in a seat with seat belt reminders under normal driving conditions.
The model for safe traffic was used to analyze in-depth studies of fatal crashes with respect to seat belt use and loss of control. Vehicles from 2003 and later in crashes from January 2004 to mid-2010 were analyzed. The data were analyzed case by case. Cars that were equipped with ESC systems and lost control and occupants not using the seat belt in a seat with a seat belt reminder were considered as nonconformities. A total of 138 fatal crashes involving 152 fatally injured occupants were analyzed.
Cars with ESC systems had fewer loss-of-control-relevant cases than cars without ESC systems. Thirteen percent of the ESC-equipped vehicles had loss-of-control-relevant crashes and 36 percent of the cars without ESC systems had loss-of-control-relevant crashes. The analysis indicates that only one car of the 9 equipped with ESC that lost control did it on a road surface with relevant friction when driving within the speed restriction of the road. In seats with seat belt reminders that are in accordance with the European New Car Assessment Programme's (Euro NCAP) protocol, 93 percent of the occupants were using a seat belt. In seats without reminders this number was 74 percent.
This study shows that ESC systems result in a very significant reduction in fatal crashes, especially under normal driving conditions. Under extreme driving conditions such as speeding or extremely low friction (snow or on the side of the road), ESC systems can fail in keeping the car under control. Seat belt reminders result in higher seat belt use rates but the level of unbelted occupants is higher than roadside studies have indicated. The holistic Vision Zero approach helped in the analysis by identifying nonconformities and putting these into the safe systems perspective.
许多新的安全系统正在进入市场。零愿景是一种安全策略,旨在通过使用整体交通安全模型来消除致命和伤害性伤害,从而开发安全系统。本文的目的是分析现代汽车中的致命事故,特别关注电子稳定控制系统(ESC)和现代安全带提醒器(SBR)的零愿景模型。该模型用于识别和理解在正常驾驶条件下,装有 ESC 系统的汽车失去控制且乘客未系安全带的情况。
使用安全交通模型深入分析涉及安全带使用和失去控制的致命碰撞事故。分析了 2003 年以后生产的车辆在 2004 年 1 月至 2010 年年中的碰撞事故。对每个案例的数据进行了分析。考虑到装有 ESC 系统且失去控制且乘客未在装有安全带提醒器的座椅上使用安全带的车辆为违规车辆。总共分析了 138 起涉及 152 名重伤乘客的致命事故。
装有 ESC 系统的汽车发生与失去控制相关的事故比没有 ESC 系统的汽车少。装有 ESC 系统的车辆中有 13%发生了与失去控制相关的事故,而没有 ESC 系统的车辆中有 36%发生了与失去控制相关的事故。分析表明,在限速内行驶在路面摩擦系数相关的道路上,只有一辆装有 ESC 的汽车失去控制。在符合欧洲新车评估计划(Euro NCAP)协议的安全带提醒器座椅上,93%的乘客系安全带。在没有提醒器的座椅上,这一数字为 74%。
这项研究表明,ESC 系统可显著降低致命事故的发生率,尤其是在正常驾驶条件下。在极端驾驶条件下,例如超速行驶或极低的摩擦(雪地或道路边缘),ESC 系统可能无法控制汽车。安全带提醒器可提高安全带使用率,但未系安全带的乘客数量高于路边研究表明的数量。整体零愿景方法通过识别违规行为并将其纳入安全系统视角,有助于分析。