Technical University of Denmark, Department of Transport, Lyngby, Denmark.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(3):315-26. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.654015.
The current study focuses on the propensity of drivers to engage in crash avoidance maneuvers in relation to driver attributes, critical events, crash characteristics, vehicles involved, road characteristics, and environmental conditions. The importance of avoidance maneuvers derives from the key role of proactive and state-aware road users within the concept of sustainable safety systems, as well as from the key role of effective corrective maneuvers in the success of automated in-vehicle warning and driver assistance systems.
The analysis is conducted by means of a mixed logit model that represents the selection among 5 emergency lateral and speed control maneuvers (i.e., "no avoidance maneuvers," "braking," "steering," "braking and steering," and "other maneuvers) while accommodating correlations across maneuvers and heteroscedasticity. Data for the analysis were retrieved from the General Estimates System (GES) crash database for the year 2009 by considering drivers for which crash avoidance maneuvers are known.
The results show that (1) the nature of the critical event that made the crash imminent greatly influences the choice of crash avoidance maneuvers, (2) women and elderly have a relatively lower propensity to conduct crash avoidance maneuvers, (3) drowsiness and fatigue have a greater negative marginal effect on the tendency to engage in crash avoidance maneuvers than alcohol and drug consumption, (4) difficult road conditions increase the propensity to perform crash avoidance maneuvers, and (5) visual obstruction and artificial illumination decrease the probability to carry out crash avoidance maneuvers.
The results emphasize the need for public awareness campaigns to promote safe driving style for senior drivers and warning about the risks of driving under fatigue and distraction being comparable to the risks of driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs. Moreover, the results suggest the need to educate drivers about hazard perception, designing a forgiving infrastructure within a sustainable safety systems, and rethinking in-vehicle collision warning systems. Future research should address the effectiveness of crash avoidance maneuvers and joint modeling of maneuver selection and crash severity.
本研究侧重于驾驶员在驾驶员属性、关键事件、事故特征、涉及车辆、道路特征和环境条件下采取避撞措施的倾向。避撞措施的重要性源于主动和感知状态的道路使用者在可持续安全系统概念中的关键作用,以及在自动化车内预警和驾驶员辅助系统成功中有效纠正措施的关键作用。
通过混合对数模型进行分析,该模型代表了在 5 种紧急横向和速度控制措施(即“不采取避撞措施”、“制动”、“转向”、“制动和转向”和“其他措施)之间的选择,同时考虑到措施之间的相关性和异方差性。分析数据来自通用估计系统(GES)2009 年的事故数据库,考虑到已知避撞措施的驾驶员。
结果表明:(1)使事故迫在眉睫的关键事件的性质极大地影响了避撞措施的选择;(2)女性和老年人采取避撞措施的倾向相对较低;(3)与酒精和药物摄入相比,困倦和疲劳对采取避撞措施的倾向有更大的负边际效应;(4)道路条件困难会增加采取避撞措施的倾向;(5)视觉障碍和人工照明会降低采取避撞措施的概率。
研究结果强调需要开展公众意识宣传活动,促进老年驾驶员安全驾驶方式,并提醒驾驶员警惕疲劳和分心驾驶的风险,这些风险与酒精和药物影响驾驶的风险相当。此外,研究结果表明需要教育驾驶员危险感知,在可持续安全系统中设计宽容的基础设施,并重新思考车内碰撞预警系统。未来的研究应关注避撞措施的有效性以及措施选择和事故严重程度的联合建模。