• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口头任务对驾驶模拟器性能的影响。

Effects of verbal tasks on driving simulator performance.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendelton Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00357-x.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-022-00357-x
PMID:35119569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8817015/
Abstract

We report results from a driving simulator paradigm we developed to test the fine temporal effects of verbal tasks on simultaneous tracking performance. A total of 74 undergraduate students participated in two experiments in which they controlled a cursor using the steering wheel to track a moving target and where the dependent measure was overall deviation from target. Experiment 1 tested tracking performance during slow and fast target speeds under conditions involving either no verbal input or output, passive listening to spoken prompts via headphones, or responding to spoken prompts. Experiment 2 was similar except that participants read written prompts overlain on the simulator screen instead of listening to spoken prompts. Performance in both experiments was worse during fast speeds and worst overall during responding conditions. Most significantly, fine scale time-course analysis revealed deteriorating tracking performance as participants prepared and began speaking and steadily improving performance while speaking. Additionally, post-block survey data revealed that conversation recall was best in responding conditions, and perceived difficulty increased with task complexity. Our study is the first to track temporal changes in interference at high resolution during the first hundreds of milliseconds of verbal production and comprehension. Our results are consistent with load-based theories of multitasking performance and show that language production, and, to a lesser extent, language comprehension tap resources also used for tracking. More generally, our paradigm provides a useful tool for measuring dynamical changes in tracking performance during verbal tasks due to the rapidly changing resource requirements of language production and comprehension.

摘要

我们报告了一个驾驶模拟器范式的结果,该范式旨在测试口头任务对同时跟踪性能的精细时间效应。共有 74 名本科生参与了两个实验,他们使用方向盘控制光标跟踪移动目标,而依赖指标是目标的总体偏差。实验 1 在慢和快目标速度下测试了在无口头输入或输出、通过耳机被动听口头提示或响应口头提示的条件下的跟踪性能。实验 2 类似,只是参与者阅读叠加在模拟器屏幕上的书面提示,而不是听口头提示。在两种实验条件下,速度较快时性能较差,响应条件下总体性能最差。最显著的是,精细的时间过程分析显示,随着参与者准备和开始说话,跟踪性能会恶化,而在说话过程中性能会稳步提高。此外,在块后调查数据中,参与者在响应条件下的对话回忆最好,而感知难度随着任务复杂性的增加而增加。我们的研究首次在言语产生和理解的最初几百毫秒内以高分辨率跟踪干扰的时间变化。我们的结果与基于负载的多任务处理性能理论一致,表明语言产生,以及在较小程度上,语言理解,需要占用也用于跟踪的资源。更一般地说,由于语言产生和理解的资源需求迅速变化,我们的范式为测量言语任务期间跟踪性能的动态变化提供了一个有用的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/cc8591651d09/41235_2022_357_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/4908150296a3/41235_2022_357_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/fec1bebe9021/41235_2022_357_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/206ab2ed9471/41235_2022_357_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/647680f98ca3/41235_2022_357_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/e0496da73145/41235_2022_357_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/28f402f27b61/41235_2022_357_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/13d86dc4a027/41235_2022_357_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/986e6afbaa7b/41235_2022_357_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/e566f091cb20/41235_2022_357_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/657e35fda459/41235_2022_357_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/cc8591651d09/41235_2022_357_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/4908150296a3/41235_2022_357_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/fec1bebe9021/41235_2022_357_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/206ab2ed9471/41235_2022_357_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/647680f98ca3/41235_2022_357_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/e0496da73145/41235_2022_357_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/28f402f27b61/41235_2022_357_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/13d86dc4a027/41235_2022_357_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/986e6afbaa7b/41235_2022_357_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/e566f091cb20/41235_2022_357_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/657e35fda459/41235_2022_357_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/8817015/cc8591651d09/41235_2022_357_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of verbal tasks on driving simulator performance.口头任务对驾驶模拟器性能的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00357-x.
2
A Heteromodal Word-Meaning Binding Site in the Visual Word Form Area under Top-Down Frontoparietal Control.顶叶顶间控制下的视觉词形区中的异模态词义绑定位点。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 28;41(17):3854-3869. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2771-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
The effect of written text on comprehension of spoken English as a foreign language.书面文本对作为外语的英语口语理解的影响。
Am J Psychol. 2007 Summer;120(2):237-61.
4
Talking is harder than listening: The time course of dual-task costs during naturalistic conversation.交谈比倾听更难:自然对话中双重任务成本的时间进程。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Jun;71(2):111-119. doi: 10.1037/cep0000114.
5
Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.母语和非母语听者在英语语音感知中因噪声、混响和说话者外国口音而产生的听力努力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Apr 15;62(4):1068-1081. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0423.
6
Visuospatial working memory and the construction of a spatial situation model in listening comprehension: An examination using a spatial tapping task.听理解中视空间工作记忆与空间情境模型的构建:使用空间打点任务的检验。
Cogn Process. 2022 Feb;23(1):41-54. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01063-0. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
7
Children's verbal working memory: role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension.儿童言语工作记忆:加工复杂性在预测口语句子理解中的作用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):669-82. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0111). Epub 2012 Jan 5.
8
The advantage of reading over listening text comprehension in Down syndrome: what is the role of verbal memory?阅读相对于听力在唐氏综合征文本理解中的优势:言语记忆的作用是什么?
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):890-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
9
Mental juggling: when does multitasking impair reading comprehension?脑力切换:多任务处理何时会损害阅读理解能力?
J Gen Psychol. 2015;142(2):90-105. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2014.1003029.
10
Second Language Vocabulary Gains from Listening Versus Reading Comprehension Input: A Comparative Study.从听力理解和阅读理解输入中获得的第二语言词汇增益:一项比较研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Jun;50(3):543-562. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09690-y.

引用本文的文献

1
A Dataset on Takeover during Distracted L2 Automated Driving.一个关于分心状态下第二语言自动驾驶时接管情况的数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Mar 31;12(1):539. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04781-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex differences in visuomotor tracking.视觉运动跟踪中的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 17;10(1):11863. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68069-0.
2
Speech Planning at Turn Transitions in Dialog Is Associated With Increased Processing Load.对话中话轮转换时的言语规划与加工负荷增加有关。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;43(7):e12768. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12768.
3
Mobile phone conversation distraction: Understanding differences in impact between simulator and naturalistic driving studies.手机通话分神:理解模拟器和自然驾驶研究中影响的差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Effects of Aging and Dual-Task Demands on the Comprehension of Less Expected Sentence Continuations: Evidence From Pupillometry.衰老和双重任务需求对理解意外句子接续的影响:来自瞳孔测量法的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00709. eCollection 2019.
5
The Index of Cognitive Activity as a Measure of Cognitive Processing Load in Dual Task Settings.作为双重任务环境中认知处理负荷度量的认知活动指数。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;9:2276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02276. eCollection 2018.
6
A Mechanistic Framework for Explaining Audience Design in Language Production.一种解释语言产生中听众设计的机制框架。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:29-51. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011653. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
7
Sex Differences in Visual Motion Processing.视觉运动处理中的性别差异。
Curr Biol. 2018 Sep 10;28(17):2794-2799.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.人类多重任务中的认知结构、灵活性和可塑性——双任务和任务转换研究的综合综述。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):557-583. doi: 10.1037/bul0000144. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Does Talking on a Cell Phone, With a Passenger, or Dialing Affect Driving Performance? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies.在驾驶时使用手机通话、与乘客交谈或拨号是否会影响驾驶表现?一项更新的实验研究系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Factors. 2018 Feb;60(1):101-133. doi: 10.1177/0018720817748145.
10
Talking is harder than listening: The time course of dual-task costs during naturalistic conversation.交谈比倾听更难:自然对话中双重任务成本的时间进程。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Jun;71(2):111-119. doi: 10.1037/cep0000114.