Yaguchi Arino, Yuzawa Junji, Klein David J, Takeda Munekasu, Harada Tomoyuki
Crit Care. 2012 May 18;16(3):R88. doi: 10.1186/cc11350.
The Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA) is a useful test to risk stratify patients with severe sepsis and assess for Gram negative infection. However, the significance of intermediate levels of EAA (0.4-0.59) at the bedside has not been well elucidated. The purpose of this study was to interpret intermediate EAA levels in clinical practice.
This retrospective observational study included all adult patients with suspected sepsis admitted to our medico-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in whom EAA was measured from July 2008 to September 2011. Data collected included EAA, white blood cell (WBC) count and differential, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and bacterial cultures. Data were analyzed by comparative statistics.
Two hundred and ten patients were studied. Ninety two (43%) patients had culture documented gram negative infection. Patients with Gram-negative organisms in cultures had significantly higher EAA levels (0.47, IQR 0.27) than those without any Gram-negative organisms in cultures (0.34, IQR 0.22) (p < 0.0001). For patients with intermediate EAA levels (0.40 to 0.59), PCT levels and presence of left shift of WBC significantly differed between patients with Gram negative organisms in their blood or other cultures and those who had no organisms in any of the cultures (4.9 versus 1.7 ng/mL, p < 0.05; 57.9 versus 18.9%, p < 0.0004, respectively).
We confirm that high levels of EAA in our cohort of patients with suspected sepsis are strongly associated with gram negative infection. In those patients with intermediate elevation in EAA levels, use of PCT and WBC differential can provide additional diagnostic value to clinicians at the bedside.
内毒素活性测定(EAA)是对严重脓毒症患者进行风险分层及评估革兰氏阴性菌感染的一项有用检测。然而,床旁EAA中间水平(0.4 - 0.59)的意义尚未得到充分阐明。本研究的目的是在临床实践中解读EAA中间水平。
这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了2008年7月至2011年9月期间入住我院内科 - 外科重症监护病房(ICU)且进行了EAA检测的所有疑似脓毒症成年患者。收集的数据包括EAA、白细胞(WBC)计数及分类、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)和细菌培养结果。采用比较统计学方法对数据进行分析。
共研究了210例患者。92例(43%)患者有培养证实的革兰氏阴性菌感染。培养出革兰氏阴性菌的患者EAA水平(0.47,四分位间距0.27)显著高于培养中无任何革兰氏阴性菌的患者(0.34,四分位间距0.22)(p < 0.0001)。对于EAA中间水平(0.40至0.59)的患者,血液或其他培养中有革兰氏阴性菌的患者与任何培养中均无细菌的患者相比,PCT水平及WBC左移情况有显著差异(分别为4.9对1.7 ng/mL,p < 0.05;57.9%对18.9%,p < 0.0004)。
我们证实,在我们的疑似脓毒症患者队列中,高水平的EAA与革兰氏阴性菌感染密切相关。对于EAA水平中度升高的患者,使用PCT和WBC分类可为床旁的临床医生提供额外的诊断价值。