文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

他汀类药物降低 LDL 胆固醇对低血管疾病风险人群的影响:27 项随机试验个体数据的荟萃分析。

The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials.

出版信息

Lancet. 2012 Aug 11;380(9841):581-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5. Epub 2012 May 17.


DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5
PMID:22607822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3437972/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Statins reduce LDL cholesterol and prevent vascular events, but their net effects in people at low risk of vascular events remain uncertain. METHODS: This meta-analysis included individual participant data from 22 trials of statin versus control (n=134,537; mean LDL cholesterol difference 1·08 mmol/L; median follow-up 4·8 years) and five trials of more versus less statin (n=39,612; difference 0·51 mmol/L; 5·1 years). Major vascular events were major coronary events (ie, non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death), strokes, or coronary revascularisations. Participants were separated into five categories of baseline 5-year major vascular event risk on control therapy (no statin or low-intensity statin) (<5%, ≥5% to <10%, ≥10% to <20%, ≥20% to <30%, ≥30%); in each, the rate ratio (RR) per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction was estimated. FINDINGS: Reduction of LDL cholesterol with a statin reduced the risk of major vascular events (RR 0·79, 95% CI 0·77-0·81, per 1·0 mmol/L reduction), largely irrespective of age, sex, baseline LDL cholesterol or previous vascular disease, and of vascular and all-cause mortality. The proportional reduction in major vascular events was at least as big in the two lowest risk categories as in the higher risk categories (RR per 1·0 mmol/L reduction from lowest to highest risk: 0·62 [99% CI 0·47-0·81], 0·69 [99% CI 0·60-0·79], 0·79 [99% CI 0·74-0·85], 0·81 [99% CI 0·77-0·86], and 0·79 [99% CI 0·74-0·84]; trend p=0·04), which reflected significant reductions in these two lowest risk categories in major coronary events (RR 0·57, 99% CI 0·36-0·89, p=0·0012, and 0·61, 99% CI 0·50-0·74, p<0·0001) and in coronary revascularisations (RR 0·52, 99% CI 0·35-0·75, and 0·63, 99% CI 0·51-0·79; both p<0·0001). For stroke, the reduction in risk in participants with 5-year risk of major vascular events lower than 10% (RR per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction 0·76, 99% CI 0·61-0·95, p=0·0012) was also similar to that seen in higher risk categories (trend p=0·3). In participants without a history of vascular disease, statins reduced the risks of vascular (RR per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction 0·85, 95% CI 0·77-0·95) and all-cause mortality (RR 0·91, 95% CI 0·85-0·97), and the proportional reductions were similar by baseline risk. There was no evidence that reduction of LDL cholesterol with a statin increased cancer incidence (RR per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol reduction 1·00, 95% CI 0·96-1·04), cancer mortality (RR 0·99, 95% CI 0·93-1·06), or other non-vascular mortality. INTERPRETATION: In individuals with 5-year risk of major vascular events lower than 10%, each 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol produced an absolute reduction in major vascular events of about 11 per 1000 over 5 years. This benefit greatly exceeds any known hazards of statin therapy. Under present guidelines, such individuals would not typically be regarded as suitable for LDL-lowering statin therapy. The present report suggests, therefore, that these guidelines might need to be reconsidered. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation; UK Medical Research Council; Cancer Research UK; European Community Biomed Programme; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; National Heart Foundation, Australia.

摘要

背景:他汀类药物可降低 LDL 胆固醇并预防血管事件,但在血管事件风险较低的人群中,其确切疗效仍不确定。

方法:本荟萃分析纳入了 22 项他汀类药物与对照组(n=134537;平均 LDL 胆固醇差值 1.08mmol/L;中位随访时间 4.8 年)和 5 项他汀类药物高剂量与低剂量(n=39612;差值 0.51mmol/L;5.1 年)的个体参与者数据。主要血管事件包括主要冠状动脉事件(即非致死性心肌梗死或冠状动脉死亡)、卒中和冠状动脉血运重建。根据对照组治疗(无他汀类药物或低强度他汀类药物)下的 5 年主要血管事件风险(<5%、≥5%至<10%、≥10%至<20%、≥20%至<30%、≥30%)将参与者分为五个类别,每类均估计每降低 1.0mmol/L LDL 胆固醇的风险比(RR)。

结果:他汀类药物降低 LDL 胆固醇可降低主要血管事件的风险(RR 0.79,95%CI 0.77-0.81,每降低 1.0mmol/L LDL 胆固醇),且与年龄、性别、基线 LDL 胆固醇或既往血管疾病以及血管和全因死亡率无关。在风险最低的两个类别中,主要血管事件的比例降低与高风险类别一样大(RR 每降低 1.0mmol/L LDL 胆固醇的风险比:最低风险至最高风险分别为 0.62[99%CI 0.47-0.81]、0.69[99%CI 0.60-0.79]、0.79[99%CI 0.74-0.85]、0.81[99%CI 0.77-0.86]和 0.79[99%CI 0.74-0.84];趋势 p=0.04),这反映出在这两个最低风险类别中,主要冠状动脉事件(RR 0.57,99%CI 0.36-0.89,p=0.0012 和 0.61,99%CI 0.50-0.74,p<0.0001)和冠状动脉血运重建(RR 0.52,99%CI 0.35-0.75 和 0.63,99%CI 0.51-0.79;两者均 p<0.0001)的风险显著降低。对于卒,5 年内主要血管事件风险低于 10%的参与者(RR 每降低 1.0mmol/L LDL 胆固醇的风险比 0.76,99%CI 0.61-0.95,p=0.0012)的风险降低与高风险类别相似(趋势 p=0.3)。在无血管疾病史的参与者中,他汀类药物降低了血管(RR 每降低 1.0mmol/L LDL 胆固醇的风险比 0.85,99%CI 0.77-0.95)和全因死亡率(RR 0.91,99%CI 0.85-0.97)的风险,且按基线风险分层,其比例降低相似。没有证据表明他汀类药物降低 LDL 胆固醇会增加癌症发病率(RR 每降低 1.0mmol/L LDL 胆固醇的风险比 1.00,99%CI 0.96-1.04)、癌症死亡率(RR 0.99,99%CI 0.93-1.06)或其他非血管性死亡率。

解释:在 5 年内主要血管事件风险低于 10%的个体中,每降低 1mmol/L LDL 胆固醇,5 年内主要血管事件的绝对减少约为 1000 人中有 11 人。这种益处大大超过了他汀类药物治疗已知的任何风险。根据目前的指南,这些个体通常不被认为适合接受 LDL 降低的他汀类药物治疗。因此,本报告表明,这些指南可能需要重新考虑。

资助:英国心脏基金会;英国医学研究理事会;英国癌症研究中心;欧洲共同体生物医学计划;澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究理事会;澳大利亚国家心脏基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/d5f25e9cba37/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/a4959391575a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/76e5e2b802e6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/b5d827c9ea09/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/1911dd854503/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/d5f25e9cba37/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/a4959391575a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/76e5e2b802e6/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/b5d827c9ea09/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/1911dd854503/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f1e/3437972/d5f25e9cba37/gr5.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials.

Lancet. 2012-5-17

[2]
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials.

Lancet. 2010-11-8

[3]
Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials.

Lancet. 2019-2-2

[4]
Impact of renal function on the effects of LDL cholesterol lowering with statin-based regimens: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised trials.

Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016-7-29

[5]
Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.

Lancet. 2005-10-8

[6]
Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials.

Lancet. 2015-1-9

[7]
Efficacy and Safety of Further Lowering of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients Starting With Very Low Levels: A Meta-analysis.

JAMA Cardiol. 2018-9-1

[8]
Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

JAMA. 2016-9-27

[9]
Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis.

Lancet. 2008-1-12

[10]
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality events.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-11-19

引用本文的文献

[1]
Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Earlier the Better.

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025-8-4

[2]
Investigating the role of genetic variations of (rs1045642) and (rs3808607) genes on serum lipid level among Malaysian male patients treated with atorvastatin.

Saudi Med J. 2025-8

[3]
Cost-utility analysis of Coronary Artery Calcium screening to guide statin prescription among intermediate-risk patients in Thailand.

PLoS One. 2025-8-21

[4]
Effectiveness of patient-oriented intervention in primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statins: Open-label randomized study.

Caspian J Intern Med. 2025-6-23

[5]
Optimizing Cardiovascular Risk Management in Primary Care Using a Personalized eCoach Solution Enhanced by an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Clinical Prediction Model: Protocol from the Coronary Artery Disease Risk Estimation and Early Detection Consortium.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025-8-8

[6]
Absolute impact of lipid levels on coronary heart disease in a real-world primary prevention cohort of 730,236 people.

Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025-7-21

[7]
Characterisation of a clinical trial-like population of high cardiovascular risk patients prior to myocardial infarction or stroke in the real world: design and protocol for a multidatabase retrospective cohort study.

BMJ Open. 2025-7-30

[8]
Evaluating the effect of mobile applications "My A:Care" and "Smart Coach" on adherence to lipid-lowering treatment in patients with dyslipidemia: a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical study.

Front Digit Health. 2025-7-7

[9]
Effects of Personalized Nutrition Education on Lipid Profiles in Chinese Adults: A Medical Student-Implemented Community Intervention Study.

Nutrients. 2025-6-28

[10]
Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline on Diabetic Kidney Disease-2025 Update.

Nephrology (Carlton). 2025-7

本文引用的文献

[1]
Lack of effect of lowering LDL cholesterol on cancer: meta-analysis of individual data from 175,000 people in 27 randomised trials of statin therapy.

PLoS One. 2012-1-19

[2]
Effects on 11-year mortality and morbidity of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin for about 5 years in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2011-11-22

[3]
Editor's Note--to make the case--evidence is required: comment on "Making the case for selective use of statins in the primary prevention setting".

Arch Intern Med. 2011-9-26

[4]
ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).

Eur Heart J. 2011-6-28

[5]
Cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for primary prevention in a low-cost statin era.

Circulation. 2011-6-27

[6]
Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared with moderate-dose statin therapy: a meta-analysis.

JAMA. 2011-6-22

[7]
Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-1-19

[8]
Is intensive LDL-cholesterol lowering beneficial and safe?

Lancet. 2010-11-13

[9]
Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol with 80 mg versus 20 mg simvastatin daily in 12,064 survivors of myocardial infarction: a double-blind randomised trial.

Lancet. 2010-11-8

[10]
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials.

Lancet. 2010-11-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索