Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica 79, Latina, Italy.
Am Heart J. 2012 May;163(5):835.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.02.009.
The optimal antiplatelet regimen in elective patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) is uncertain. We aimed to assess the impact of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb/IIIa) inhibition with eptifibatide in clinically stable subjects with diffuse coronary lesions.
Patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing PCI by means of implantation of >33 mm of drug-eluting stent were single-blindedly randomized to heparin plus eptifibatide versus heparin alone. The primary end point was the rate of abnormal post-PCI creatine kinase-MB mass values. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (ie, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization) and MACE plus bailout GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor use.
The study was stopped for slow enrollment and funding issues after including a total of 91 patients: 44 were randomized to heparin plus eptifibatide, and 47, to heparin alone. Analysis for the primary end point showed a trend toward lower rates of abnormal post-PCI creatine kinase-MB mass values in the heparin-plus-eptifibatide group (18 [41%]) versus the heparin-alone group (26 [55%], relative risk 0.74 [95% CI 0.48-1.15], P = .169). Similar nonstatistically significant trends were found for rates of MACE, their components, or MACE plus bailout GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors (all P > .05). Notably, heparin plus eptifibatide proved remarkably safe because major bleedings or minor bleeding was uncommon and nonsignificantly different in both groups (all P > .05).
Given its lack of statistical power, the INSTANT study cannot definitively provide evidence against or in favor of routine eptifibatide administration in stable patients undergoing implantation of multiple drug-eluting stent for diffuse coronary disease. However, the favorable trend evident for the primary end point warrants further larger randomized studies.
在择期行复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,最佳的抗血小板治疗方案仍不明确。本研究旨在评估在有弥漫性冠状动脉病变的临床稳定患者中,应用依替巴肽抑制糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa(GpIIb/IIIa)对患者的影响。
接受 >33mm 药物洗脱支架植入的稳定型冠心病患者,采用单盲法随机分为肝素+依替巴肽组和肝素组。主要终点为 PCI 术后肌酸激酶同工酶-MB 质量异常值的发生率。次要终点为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(即心脏死亡、心肌梗死或紧急血运重建)和 MACE 加挽救性 GpIIb/IIIa 抑制剂的使用率。
由于入组缓慢和资金问题,本研究在纳入了 91 例患者后被终止:44 例患者被随机分至肝素+依替巴肽组,47 例患者分至肝素组。对主要终点的分析显示,肝素+依替巴肽组 PCI 术后肌酸激酶同工酶-MB 质量异常值的发生率有降低趋势(18 [41%] vs. 肝素组 26 [55%],相对危险度 0.74 [95%CI 0.48-1.15],P =.169)。两组间 MACE、其组成部分或 MACE 加挽救性 GpIIb/IIIa 抑制剂的发生率也存在类似但无统计学意义的趋势(所有 P >.05)。值得注意的是,肝素+依替巴肽组安全性良好,大出血或小出血均不常见且两组间无显著差异(所有 P >.05)。
鉴于 INSTANT 研究缺乏统计学效能,因此无法明确提供常规依替巴肽给药对弥漫性冠状动脉疾病行多枚药物洗脱支架植入术的稳定患者有益或有害的确切证据。然而,主要终点的有利趋势提示需要进一步开展更大规模的随机研究。