University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(4):330-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.847582.108.847582. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, if performed promptly, is the preferred strategy to restore flow to the infarct-related artery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We sought to determine whether eptifibatide, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, given before catheterization would improve clinical outcomes in patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
We randomly assigned a total of 400 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention to treatment initiated before cardiac catheterization, with either heparin plus eptifibatide (201 patients) or heparin alone (199 patients), in addition to oral aspirin (160 mg) and high-dose clopidogrel (600 mg). The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, recurrent myocardial infarction, or recurrent severe ischemia during the first 30 days after randomization. At 30 days, the primary end point was reached by 13 patients (6.47%) assigned to heparin plus eptifibatide and by 11 patients (5.53%) assigned to heparin alone (relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.52 to 2.70; P=0.69). The rates of major or minor bleeding were higher in patients assigned to heparin plus eptifibatide than that in patients assigned to heparin alone (22.4% versus 14.6%; relative risk, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.83; P=0.04).
In patients pretreated with high-dose clopidogrel who were referred for primary PCI, treatment with heparin plus eptifibatide, when compared with heparin alone, did not improve clinical outcomes and was associated with more bleeding complications.
如果及时进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(primary percutaneous coronary intervention),这是恢复 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction)相关动脉血流的首选策略。我们旨在确定在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,在进行导管插入术之前给予依替巴肽(eptifibatide),一种血小板糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂,是否会改善临床结局。
我们总共随机分配了 400 名 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,在进行心脏导管插入术之前,一组接受肝素加依替巴肽(201 例)治疗,另一组接受肝素单药(199 例)治疗,此外,所有患者均接受口服阿司匹林(160mg)和高剂量氯吡格雷(600mg)治疗。主要终点是随机分组后 30 天内任何原因导致的死亡、复发性心肌梗死或复发性严重缺血的复合终点。30 天时,肝素加依替巴肽组有 13 例(6.47%)患者和肝素组有 11 例(5.53%)患者达到主要终点(相对风险,1.18;95%置信区间,0.52 至 2.70;P=0.69)。与肝素组相比,肝素加依替巴肽组患者的主要或次要出血发生率更高(22.4%比 14.6%;相对风险,1.69;95%置信区间,1.01 至 2.83;P=0.04)。
在接受高剂量氯吡格雷预处理且接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,与肝素单药治疗相比,肝素加依替巴肽治疗并未改善临床结局,反而与更多出血并发症相关。