Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(2):323-39. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.2.j.
Health care and biomedical research environments in the United States are largely characterized by strategic relational practices conducted beyond the public gaze. The very nature of health care has been widely reconceptualized from a response to physical/biological imperatives regulated by health promotion and the epidemiological distribution of diseases to profit/market imperatives regulated by "product/brand" promotion and market dynamics. At critical decision points throughout the system, we find the multinational pharmaceutical industry wielding the influence that its wealth and power have bought. This study contributes to the growing body of work that seeks to illuminate the relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and the various entities that constitute the U.S. health and research systems. Through the use of case studies, it examines the relationships between the multinational pharmaceutical industry and the large disease-specific public and professional nonprofit organizations. It explores several questions, including: Is the concept of what constitutes a conflict of interest being purposefully manipulated? Is the public benevolence afforded to nonprofits extended to their corporate partners in ways that preclude critical oversight of relational dynamics? And are public donations, solicited by and given in good faith to these organizations, inevitably serving the economic interests and profits of donor pharmaceutical companies?
美国的医疗保健和生物医学研究环境在很大程度上以公众关注之外的战略关系实践为特征。医疗保健的性质已经从对健康促进和疾病的流行病学分布所规定的物理/生物需求的反应,广泛地重新概念化为受“产品/品牌”推广和市场动态所规定的利润/市场需求的反应。在整个系统的关键决策点上,我们发现跨国制药业正在发挥其财富和权力所带来的影响力。这项研究有助于越来越多的工作,旨在阐明制药业与构成美国健康和研究系统的各种实体之间的关系。通过使用案例研究,它考察了跨国制药业与大型特定疾病的公共和专业非营利组织之间的关系。它探讨了几个问题,包括:构成利益冲突的概念是否被有意操纵?给予非营利组织的公益是否以排除对关系动态的关键监督的方式扩展到其企业合作伙伴?并且,这些组织真诚地募集和接受的公共捐款是否不可避免地服务于捐赠制药公司的经济利益和利润?