Department of Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jun;95(6):3070-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4975.
The aim was to assess the intensified dairy sheep farming systems of the Chios breed in Greece, establishing a typology that may properly describe and characterize them. The study included the total of the 66 farms of the Chios sheep breeders' cooperative Macedonia. Data were collected using a structured direct questionnaire for in-depth interviews, including questions properly selected to obtain a general description of farm characteristics and overall management practices. A multivariate statistical analysis was used on the data to obtain the most appropriate typology. Initially, principal component analysis was used to produce uncorrelated variables (principal components), which would be used for the consecutive cluster analysis. The number of clusters was decided using hierarchical cluster analysis, whereas, the farms were allocated in 4 clusters using k-means cluster analysis. The identified clusters were described and afterward compared using one-way ANOVA or a chi-squared test. The main differences were evident on land availability and use, facility and equipment availability and type, expansion rates, and application of preventive flock health programs. In general, cluster 1 included newly established, intensive, well-equipped, specialized farms and cluster 2 included well-established farms with balanced sheep and feed/crop production. In cluster 3 were assigned small flock farms focusing more on arable crops than on sheep farming with a tendency to evolve toward cluster 2, whereas cluster 4 included farms representing a rather conservative form of Chios sheep breeding with low/intermediate inputs and choosing not to focus on feed/crop production. In the studied set of farms, 4 different farmer attitudes were evident: 1) farming disrupts sheep breeding; feed should be purchased and economies of scale will decrease costs (mainly cluster 1), 2) only exercise/pasture land is necessary; at least part of the feed (pasture) must be home-grown to decrease costs (clusters 1 and 4), 3) providing pasture to sheep is essential; on-farm feed production decreases costs (mainly cluster 3), and 4) large-scale farming (feed production and cash crops) does not disrupt sheep breeding; all feed must be produced on-farm to decrease costs (mainly cluster 3). Conducting a profitability analysis among different clusters, exploring and discovering the most beneficial levels of intensified management and capital investment should now be considered.
本研究旨在评估希腊基克拉迪绵羊养殖系统的集约化模式,建立一种能够准确描述和刻画这些系统的分类法。研究对象包括马其顿希俄斯绵羊养殖合作社的 66 个农场。通过使用结构化的直接问卷进行深入访谈收集数据,问卷中包含了适当选择的问题,以获取农场特征和整体管理实践的总体描述。对数据进行多元统计分析,以获得最合适的分类法。首先,使用主成分分析生成不相关变量(主成分),然后用于连续聚类分析。使用层次聚类分析决定聚类的数量,而使用 K-均值聚类分析将农场分配到 4 个聚类中。对识别出的聚类进行描述,并使用单因素方差分析或卡方检验进行比较。主要差异体现在土地利用和设施设备的可用性和类型、扩张率以及预防性羊群健康计划的应用上。总体而言,聚类 1 包括新成立的、集约化的、设备齐全的、专业化的农场,聚类 2 包括基础良好的、平衡的绵羊和饲料/作物生产的农场。聚类 3 包括专注于耕地作物而非绵羊养殖的小型羊群农场,有向聚类 2 演变的趋势,而聚类 4 包括代表基希俄斯绵羊养殖较为保守形式的农场,投入低/中等,不注重饲料/作物生产。在所研究的农场中,有 4 种不同的农民态度:1)农业扰乱绵羊养殖;应购买饲料,规模经济将降低成本(主要是聚类 1);2)只需要运动/牧场;至少部分饲料(牧场)必须自给自足以降低成本(聚类 1 和 4);3)为绵羊提供牧场至关重要;农场内饲料生产可降低成本(主要是聚类 3);4)大规模养殖(饲料生产和经济作物)不会扰乱绵羊养殖;所有饲料都必须在农场内生产以降低成本(主要是聚类 3)。现在应该考虑在不同聚类之间进行盈利性分析,探索和发现最有利的集约化管理和资本投资水平。